4th Admendment Mapp Vs Ohio

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Landmark Supreme Court Case Integrated Government Mrs. Brahe and Mrs. Compton.

Advertisements

Historical Background Dollree Mapp was under suspicion for possibly hiding a person suspected in a bombing. Mapp refused to let the police in her home.

Section 3 Introduction-1

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Rights of Suspects The Fourth Amendment The Fifth Amendment.

Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.

Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.

Supreme Court Cases. U. S. v. Nixon Background: Background: Watergate Hotel; burglars break into Democratic Party headquarters. White House staff are.

Objective 29l-Analyze the rights of the accused Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois Kelsey McLaughlin and Kelsey Bois.

Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.

MAPP V. OHIO Rachel Simmons. Background & Freedom at Issue  The 4 th and 14 th Amendments  With reasonable suspicion of a bomb at the house, the police.

{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?

Miranda Warnings and The Bill of Rights P.S. 2 Summarizing Activity.

The Bill of Rights.

New Jersey v. T.L.O By Luke Wills and Caroline Weschler.

Search and Seizure. I) Search and Seizure A) The 4 th amendment outlines the rules governing search and seizure.

THE 4 TH AMENDMENT The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.

FREEDOM & SECURITY OF THE PERSON Pgs th Amendment  Ended slavery in  States & National Govt. could no longer allow slavery.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated;

Mapp v. Ohio (1961).

The 4 th amendment. The 4 th amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported.

Rights of the Accused. 1. Arrest With a warrant: a) based on probable cause b) warrant obtained from a judge presented with probable cause With a warrant:

Criminal Investigation: Laws of Arrest, Search and Seizure Chapter 12 Law and Government.

Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.

The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.

DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.

Criminal Prosecution Process May 5, Arrest Police officers arrest suspects when in their professional judgment they believe that a crime has been.

Arrests, questioning, and imprisonment Objective: Don’t be in the wrong place at the wrong time!!

Defendants’ Rights Characterize defendants’ rights and identify issues that arise in their implementation.

The American Legal System

Criminal Prosecution Process

Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation

Understanding the Constitution

Court Cases that Protect the Individual Citizen

Landmark Supreme Court Cases:

Crime and Due Process There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

Limiting the Right of Search

The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren

Landmark Supreme Court Cases:

Court Cases Brown v. Board of Education

Landmark Supreme Court Cases:

Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual rights

Questioning, Searches, And Arrests

Part of the 4th Amendment

Rights of Criminal Suspects

Name that tune! Raise your hand if you know how to answer BOTH of the questions below. Artist? How does this song relate to what we’re learning today?

Important Court Cases of the 20th Century

Forensics Week 7.

Criminal Justice U.S. Constitution Unit Hermitage Tech Center

YouTube - The Declaration of Independence

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:

How Do the 4th and 5th Amendment Protect against unreasonable law enforcement procedures? Lesson 31.

Intro to American Law.

By: Arron Ferguson Ignacio Leibas

October 16, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:

Criminal Case Steps Arrested and booked.

Rights of the Accused Summary.

THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS: THE INVESTIGATIVE PHASE

AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.

Warm Up – February 11 Grab the handouts from the front table

Section 5: Knowing Your Rights

Search & Seizure in Schools:

by Marcos Cardona-7th period

4th Amendment: Search and Seizure

Rights of the Accused Part 1

The Warren Court AP US History.

Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations

AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.

Presentation transcript:

4th Admendment Mapp Vs Ohio Karla Moreno-Sanchez

What is the 4th Admendment? The right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses,papers,and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

What do u have to do to not violate the 4th Admendment? No warrants should be issued but upon probable cause.

What are the Miranda Rights? Your Miranda Rights need to be read to you 1.Right to remain silent 2.Anything you say will be used against you 3.Right to attorney 4.If you cannot afford an attorney one will be pointed

Mapp Vs Ohio 1961 Police pushed door open Believed a bomb was there She asked for warrant and they just showed a random paper They found books and photographs that contained sexual content

Court Convicted and sentenced to 7 years in prison She said she had the right to posses material (1st Admendment) Evidence should have never been used against her They violated the 14th Admendment. Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness