Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,
Advertisements

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
A.M. Baldin seminar series. XXI Baldin Seminar Retrospective A few historical remarks by Lee Pondrom.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Jet Physics in ALICE Mercedes López Noriega - CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Hot Quarks 2006 Villasimius, Sardinia - Italy.
C2CR07-Lake Tahoe February 28, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 C2CR07 Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF Collaboration) CDF Run 2 Min-Bias.
Searches for double partons Lee Pondrom University of Wisconsin July 23, 2012.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 Correlations between J/ψ and charged hadrons Chun Zhang / Jiangyong Jia.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
1 Jets in PHENIX Jiangyong Jia, Columbia Univerisity How to measure jet properties using two particle correlation method (In PHENIX)? Discuss formula for.
A.M. Baldin seminar series. XXI Baldin Seminar Retrospective A few historical remarks by Lee Pondrom.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
Two particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC Francesco Noferini Bologna University INFN – sez. Bologna ALICE-TOF Tuesday, May 16th Villasimius (Italy) HOT.
on behalf of the CDF and DØ collaborations
Searches for double partons
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Physics and Techniques of Event Generators
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Lake Louise Winter Institute
PHZ 6358 Fall 2011 The Modeling of the Underlying Event Rick Field
A Closer Look at the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Min-Bias and the Underlying Event in Run 2
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
The LHC Physics Environment
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Jet fragmentation results at CDF
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
Tracks and double partons
Tracks and double partons
The “Underlying Event” at CDF and CMS
Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

Search for double parton interactions in Z-> events from p-p collisions at 1.96 TeV Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration XXI International Baldin Seminar September 10-15, 2012

Old Moscow СТАРАЯ МОСКВА

Parts of CDF for this analysis Charged particle central tracker Central electromagnetic and hadronic calorimetry Central muon detectors Polar coordinates; origin at center of the detector, z axis in proton direction, =-log(tan(/2)), φ in plane perpendicular to the z axis.

CDF RunII dijet end view

Typical dijet event display

The parton model is indispensable for understanding hadron collisions Monte Carlo programs like Pythia base their analysis on the parton model, and are very successful in explaining observations. Pbar-p interactions are described by 2->2 simple parton-parton scattering, folded into parton distribution functions determined by lepton-hadron scattering.

In a double parton interaction this process occurs twice

Signature of DPI The two hard scatters are perturbative. The two hard scatters are independent, consistent with the conservation laws. If the momentum fractions and energies involved in the two scatters are modest, independence should be obtained. Two hard scatters in a single interaction can be modeled by two separate interactions (vertices) in the same event.

Single hard scatter and the ‘underlying event’

Single vertex dijet or Z+jet event

Charged tracks in the transverse region CDF studied the underlying event in the region transverse to Z production. PYTHIA was tuned to match the charged track distribution.(PRD82,034001,2010)). Track pT > .5 GeV, track |η|<1 Parameters track multiplicity, scalar sum track pT, max pT. The PYTHIA tune has been widely used.

Quick check of underlying event with dijet data

Transverse track activity depends slowly on pTZ or jet1 ET About 90% of the ∑pT plots are energy independent. PYTHIA agrees with data. Underlying event activity is the same for pTZ ≈ jet1ET If double parton hard scattering exists, a good place to look for it would be in the transverse region. Try scalar ∑transverse track pT>15 GeV as a ‘trigger’

To see if it works, try jet events with two vertices Use dijet ET>100 GeV data Require jets one and two to be on the first vertex. Exactly two vertices per event. Extra jets three and four can be anywhere Separate the two vertices by at least 10 cm. Require vtx2 to have at least 3 charged tracks, with pT>.5 GeV and |η|<1. Second vtx σ ≈ 12 mb.

Two vertex event with 2 jets on primary vtx and 2 jets on 2nd vtx

Second vertex is ‘minbias’ CDF ‘minbias’ σ ≈ 36 mb defined by the luminosity monitor Track requirements here are different, and σ ≈ 12 mb is smaller. In the data the avge probability of two vertices is 30%.

Transverse tracks on the 2nd vtx Minbias

Transverse track activity The first vertex transverse tracks are defined with respect to the azimuth φ of the highest ET jet: /3<Δφ(jet-track)<2/3 second vertex transverse tracks are defined in the same way with respect to the same jet – highest ET jet on vtx1, track on vtx2. ~60% of all ‘triggers’ have a pair of transverse jets with ET>5 GeV on 2nd vtx.

∑transtrackpT>15 GeV Note that the fraction increases from .001 to .015 going from minbias (plotted as ET=5GeV) to jet ET>20 GeV Using σ ≈ 12 mb for the 2nd vertex, the effective cross section for the ∑pT>15 GeV ‘trigger’ is σ ≈ 12 b.

Jet ET for 2nd vtx and recoil jet against ET>20 GeV CDFPreliminary ETGeV ETGeV

Δφ for 2nd vtx jets relative to jet1 on 1st vtx CDF Preliminary CDF Preliminary

2nd vtx ‘trigger’ jets The ∑transtrackpT>15GeV ‘trigger’ creates two jets on the second vertex which are softer than jet20 (the lowest ET CDF jet trigger). The two jets created by the trigger are in the transverse region in φ relative to jet1, which is on the first vertex.

Δφ of jet pair on 2nd vtx created by ∑transtrackpT>15 GeV/c

Δφ for jet pair on 2nd vtx There is a clear back-to-back signal for the jet pair created in the transverse region in φ of the leading jet pair on the first vertex. The Δφ resolution is broader than for jetET>20 Gev, which has on average higher ET jets.

DPI search strategy Use Z-> data to define the φ region transverse to pTZ. Require only one vertex in the event Apply the ∑transtrackpT>15 GeV ‘trigger’ Look for a pair of back to back jets like those found on the second vertex.

Use entire Ldt=9/fb high pT muon dataset Require two muons opposite charge |η|<1. Eliminate events with cosmic rays Require at least one good quality central muon 215589 events 30GeV<m<130GeV 176351 events 80GeV<m<100 GeV Require at least one jet with ET>5 GeV 45738 events Z pair pT>10 GeV 21443 events Z pair pT>20 GeV

Z-> kinematics data and Pythia CDF Preliminary

ET jets 1&2 data and Pythia

ET jet3 and Δφ jet1-pTZ

Δφ jets-pTZ

Δφ pTZ and recoil jets Jet1 has a strong peak near Δφ≈, but also has a long flat tail. Jets2 and 3 have a slight preference to be close to the pTZ vector direction! Pythia agrees with data regarding these features.

Drell-Yan mechanism and pTZ

Drell-Yan mechanism and pTZ Lowest order diagram has pTZ=0. Initial state radiation by either incident quark can give low pTZ, but soft multijets can cancel each other out. There are several variations of the Compton diagram, which dominate at higher pTZ.. Extra jets can radiate from anywhere. .

∑transtrackpT for pTZ>10GeV

‘Trigger’=∑transtrackpT>15GeV/c. 3 jets required with ET>5GeV

∑transtrackpT>15 GeV Jet ET distributions are broader after the ‘trigger’, the opposite of DPI expectations. Jets 1 and 2 both move into the transverse region in φ! This is not supposed to happen in double parton scattering. Jet 1 stays put to balance the Z.

‘Trigger’=∑transtrackpT>15 GeV/c

∑transtrackpT>15 GeV The ‘trigger’ has little effect on jet3. The ‘trigger’ moves both jets 1&2 into the transverse φ region relative to pTZ. Δφ12 then favors ~140 degrees, forming a Mercedes Benz pattern in φ: pTZ-ETj1-ETj2 Jet3 can be anywhere.

Jets 1 and 2 combine to balance pTZ,, jet 3 is anywhere

‘Trigger’=∑transtrackpT>15 GeV/c

Effect of the trigger on jets 2&3 Pythia agrees with data regarding the behavior of jet3, given limited statistics. The true shape of Δφ23 without DPI is unknown. DPI should enhance Δφ23 near  radians No enhancement is observed.

Expected DPI yield Assume that each Z production event contains a DPI vertex as defined by the two vertex study. Then .0006 of all Z production events should have two extra back to back jets. Given 46,000 events implies 28 DPI events on the Δφ jets2&3 plot.

Expected DPI yield

Outlook Pythia and Z + jets data agree very well. Neither one shows any sign of DPI. Does Pythia 6.224 contain perturbative DPI? Is it possible to predict the shape of Δφ jets2&3 without DPI, to set a limit?

Дополнительный материал Конец доклада

CDF detector

CDF RunII dijet end view

The parton model is indispensable for understanding hadron collisions