P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Prep

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Timing Considerations for Short-term Preemption and Competition Automation NAESB OS Presentation.
Advertisements

Project Management Concepts
Facilitated by Joanne Fraser RiverSystems
Muscle Biomechanics.
Writing as a Team Nicole Lindsay Bachelor of Commerce Quarter 2 January 2006.
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
Testing Variables Students will manipulate variables of a pendulum; draw conclusions from experimentation with pendulums Why should you test only one variable.
Cory Fulkerson (Project Manager) - Mechanical Engineer John Graham - Computer Engineer Clayton Hooks - Electrical Engineer O’Raphael Okoro - Electrical.
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Christian Seemayer Rob Proetti Tim DeBellis Tim Giguere Will Kelly.
Project Review. Current State Currently on track to meet our mission objectives and cover all customer needs – Unpredictable to know whether or not sensors.
MSD-I Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
MSD-II Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
Engineering H193 - Team Project Gateway Engineering Education Coalition P. 1Spring Quarter Project Management Week 2 Day 2.
Software Engineering Chapter 15 Construction Leads to Initial Operational Capability Fall 2001.
IENG 471 Facilities Planning
Recap from last week Understand organizations, including the four frames, organizational structures. Explain why stakeholder management and top management.
3-Point Bending Device to Measure Transmural Strains for Multilayer Soft Tissue Composite Week 1 Weekly Report Jennifer Olson Sarah Rivest Brian Schmidtberg.
LSU 01/17/2006Spring LaACES Schedule For the semester and the next few weeks.
Parachute Design Unit. Design a parachute that will safely deliver its cargo to the ground according to the following constraints: * The parachute must.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review P15080 Flow Culture System November 13, 2014.
MyFloridaMarketPlace MyFloridaMarketPlace User Meeting May 25, 2004.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
Team Churro: Sharon Grimshaw, Maggie Su, Louis Yi, Morgan Zheng.
The 9 steps to successful project implementation From BD to Operations.
Frequent Marshmallow Challenge Releases. The Challenge You will be building a cell tower out of very sophisticated materials. One company will use the.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
Muscular Strength and Endurance
Complete Design & Gate Review. Complete Design Detailed Design Review (DDR) 1.“High and medium technical risk” areas –Design Review (Prelim-DDR): standard.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
Health Related Fitness Evaluating your Health-related Fitness PE H.S. 1.12:Cardiorespiratory Endurance The learner will be able to list the cardio respiratory.
Re-alignment of Responsibility Shift from Jan to Tony.
EDGE™ Project Status Update P09023 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb Next Generation Jim Breunig (ME)
ME 3.0 to ME 5.0 ME3.0 review scheduled during the Joint NDSWG/NATF meeting in July. There were approximately 180 comments on the ME3.0 paper. Deadline.
MESA USA Prosthetic Arm Challenge 2.1- Revisions
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Chapter 6: Database Project Management
Project Controls: As-Built S-Curves
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Preliminary Detailed Design
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
Project Initiatives Identified by the CIA Project
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Review
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Final Presentation
University of Idaho – Interdisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design
Successful Project Management
[Project Name] Project Report
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, 2004.
The 9 steps to successful project implementation
[Project Name] Project Report
Executive Steering Committee Meeting May 6, 2009
Team P15441 Mini Air Sub-System Design Review
P17082 Biomechanics Elbow Model
P17082 Integrated System Build & Test Review
SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455
Project Status Update P09023 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb Next Generation Jim Breunig (ME)
Final Status Update P09006 – Upper Extremity Exerciser
Mechanical Bioreactor
P17250: Robofish Charging Station
Team P16228: Magnetically Levitated Propeller
Detailed Design Review (Phase 4)
P15662: Linearly Reciprocating Friction Tester
Detailed Design Review Solar Thermal Water Heater
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001
University of Idaho – Interdisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design
Project Model Otto Husby Cimple AS.
Presentation transcript:

P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Build and Test Prep Maria Romero-Creel, Shannon Keenan, Chris Harley, Amanda Cook

Agenda New Issues / Problem Review / Design Updates Accomplishments since last review Parts Status BOM Build Status Testing Status and Results Action Items Schedule Review Miscellaneous Deliverables

Overview Team Vision The plan for this phase was to regroup after the break and evaluate overall project status, goals, and revisit any outstanding action items from the detailed design review and gate review. These action items mainly concerned updating documentation and continuing progress on a prototype.  Completed Goals: All necessary documentation was updated Problem tracking was introduced Initial plans for a truss structure were used Possible design competitions were investigated. Pending Goals: Completed prototype and test plan data – Due to unlikely difficulties with 3D printing that should not be a regular concern moving forward.  

New Issues and Design Updates No new issues have been identified so far. Design Updates No updated have been done on the designs of the bones. Preliminary design of truss was completed.  

Parts Status and BOM Parts Status: All missing parts from McMaster Carr have been ordered and are scheduled to arrive next week. Bones are in the process of being printed.

Test Plans – Engineering Requirements Overview

Test Plans ER1,2,3 – Static Force of Muscle A, B, and C. Test - Attach load cell to break in muscle string, hang 250g mass from hand hook, wait for arm to lower under the weight and settle, then get read out from Capstone. Validity- Force achieved at rest must match accepted anatomical value. ER4 – Angles at each position Test - With each muscle attached and load cells strung, and the goniometer attached and reading out to Capstone, the arm is bent at the elbow and moved through the available range of motion. Validity- readout must show that the arm can move from approximately 0o and 180o.   ER5 – Max Load Test -Hang a load of 500g from the hand hook while holding the lower arm up to the upper arm so that the angle of the elbow is approximately 0­o. release the lower arm and allow the weight and lower arm to fall. Validity- The arm must be able to fall and stop while still holding the weight, staying upright and stable and produce steady force and angle change graphs / tables through Capstone. There should be no bending or material failure in a valid case, and the entire base must still be resting on the tabletop.

Test Plans ER6- Muscle Attachment Position Test - With load cells in place, no weights, and the lower arm resting so that the angle of the elbow is approximately 90o, measure the angles of the muscles with the bones and the distance of the muscle attachment to the bones. Validity – Both values must be within ±5%of the average adult. ER7,8 – Deviation and Possible Positions Test - Set the model in each possible position with the 250g weight. For each position (supinated wrist, pronated wrist, flexed elbow), allow the device to sit, with no contact or extra support from an outside object for 1 minute, measure deviation. Validity – The position set by the user must not deviate by more than ±1cm during the wait period.   ER9- Time Required for Assembly Test - Begin with an unassembled device. Start a timer and begin assembly, including the addition of base structure strings, load cells, goniometer, and arm straps. Include all hardware cables necessary for data acquisition (load cells, goniometer). Validity – The full assembly takes approximately 20 minutes or less to assemble and can support a 250g weight from the hand hook upon completion.

Action Completion from Gate Review Action Item from last review Update BOM-Amanda & Maria-100% Review Engineering Requirements - All-100% Print Full Set of High Density Bones - All - 50% Build Truss Structure - Amanda & Chris- 90% Begin Considerations for Paper & Poster - All - 50% Update Schedule (including Casting Option) - Shannon - 100% Research Possible Competitions - All - 90% Consider Current Problems & Plans- All - 100%  Apply Test Plans to Prototype - All - 0% Make Any Manual Changes to Bones - All - 0% Purchasing - Amanda - 90%

Action Items Action Items Moving Forward No Casting: Finish Printing Bones - All Assemble Prototype w/ subsystems - All Test Prototype - All Document Truss Construction - Chris & Amanda Track Any Problems - Shannon Make Manual Edits to Bones - All With Casting: Prep for Casting Molds – All Upcoming Deadlines: Casting Decision Week 3 12 model deliverable decision Week 5

Plans & Schedule

Individual Three Week Plan Amanda: Lead purchasing and budget plans/requests Work with the team to print the remaining 3-D bones Actively participate in the building of the truss structure Test the subsystems (bones, truss structure, and software)Continue to consult with SME for physiological accuracy of the model Shannon: Start & maintain problem tracking Help with managing test plans & results Begin tracking design competitions and upcoming dates Assist with construction & printing Manage timeline on upcoming decisions: Casting & 12 models

Individual Three Week Plan Chris: Get final prints of all bones (3- 8) hours Any solidworks modeling/ drawing updates Test plan finalization (6-8) hours Begin building the first unit (5) Begin testing of the first unit (6 hours) Maria: Consult SMEs and Customer and decide on casting vs. 3D printing. Participate in printing and testing of design. Participate in building and assessing feasibility of model. Consult SMEs and help ensure physiological accuracy of model. Work on manual for building, testing, and using the completed model.

Miscellaneous Deliverables ASME IAM3D Challenge: (April 21) https://www.asme.org/events/competitions/iam3d-challenge IEEE Design Competition: (June 1) www.ieee.org/membership_services/membership/students/awards/eng_medicine_undergrad_design.html BMES Design Competition: (No available date yet) www.bmes.org/4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_Document&DocID=207&MenuKey=students (this is for 2016 but hopefully maybe there's a 2017 one?)

Questions or Suggestions?