Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Justice.
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
Ethics, Part 2 Normative Codes. a) DEONTOOGICAL: [161-65] i) DUTY-BASED ii) CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE -UNIVERSALIZING ACTS iii) MAXIM OF RESPECT iv) MOTIVES.
Module 10 The Role of Government The Canadian Welfare Society and Taxation.
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
ETHICAL APPROACHES JUSTICE ETHICS OF CARE RIGHTS UTILITARIANISM.
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
What is a Just Society? What is Justice?.
Chapter 42 Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
Introduction to Ethics in Health Sector. 2 Why Is Ethical Analysis Needed? Problems are not just technical How do we know which problems are important?
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics - 1 Key Definitions  Moral: “relating to principles of right and wrong”  Ethics: “the discipline of dealing with what is good and bad and with.
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
AP/SOSC 2340/ o Intermediate Business & Society Lecture 4: Libertarianism.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Rawls IV: Wrapping-up PHIL Original position, cont. of discussion Exclusion of prejudices while contracting in the OP:  'One excludes the knowledge.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
5 Some Traditional Ethical Theories
Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.
Utilitarianism Lecture 3: Utilitarianism and justice.
Is the pure free market distribution of wealth and income fair and just?
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Utilitarian Theory of Ethics Utilitarian theory is a consequentialist approach to judging moral behavior. Consequentialist hold that –consequences count.
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
By Aaftab Ullah. Normative theories Normative theories Consequencialist theory Consequencialist theory Egoism Egoism Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Non-
Essential Question: How did the political theories of socialism and communism reflect the changes brought about by the period of industrialization?
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Chapter 3: Ethics for Policy Analysts “If liberty and equality…are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike.
BEJ Lecture Three: Justice and Resources Distribution.
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
BUSINESS, LAW & ETHICS misbahuddin azzuhri.
John Rawls Ronald Dworkin
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Outline of John Rawls from “Justice as Fairness” and A Theory of Justice (1921) pp The Second Article on Rawls.
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Global Economic Justice
A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z
Socialism vs. Capitalism
Alexis wagner BA F323 University of alaska fairbanks 7 june 2017
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Presentation transcript:

Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice

Theories of Justice Utilitarianism : “The maximization of happiness ultimately determines what is just and unjust.”(Shaw 87) Libertarianism : “…Justice consists in permitting each person to live as he or she pleases, free from the interference of others.”(Shaw 90) Egalitarianism : “…Justice must be associated with fairness and the moral equality of persons.”(Shaw 97)

Can it ever be unjust to accumulate wealth? Utilitarianism Viewpoint From the utilitarian perspective, accumulating wealth in itself isn’t bad as it is maximizing your happiness. When it comes to the effects of maximizing wealth, utilitarian's would argue maximizing wealth is unjust. Based on the declining marginal utility of money “… successive additions to one’s income produce, on average, less happiness or welfare than did earlier additions.”(Shaw 89) It would be unjust to accumulate money as you would gain less happiness from the money than if you were to give it to a less fortunate person.

Continued… Libertarianism Viewpoint: “… people are entitled to their holdings (that is, goods, money, property) as long as they have acquired them fairly.”(Shaw 91) Basically saying that as long as you accumulated your wealth without infringing on other peoples Lockean Rights, you can save or spend your wealth as you please. This viewpoint argues that accumulation of wealth is just, even when others are going hungry.

Continued… Egalitarianism Viewpoint: The egalitarian theory of justice uses objective reasoning and the maximin rule to decide if things are just. According to Rowl’s second principle “… economic inequalities are to… be to the greatest expected benefit of the least advantaged members of society.”(Shaw 101) This principle would rule that accumulating wealth is unjust as it does not benefit anyone except for the singular person. On the other hand if the accumulation of wealth was to set up a trust for a charity contributing to the least advantaged members of society it would be considered a just action.

Works Cited Shaw, William H. Business Ethics. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014. Print.