Maryland Commission on Climate Change 5/23/16

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SDC Climate Change Event Dr Keith MacLean Head of Policy and Public Affairs.
Advertisements

California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Department of the Environment Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009 October 2012.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Omar Abdel Samad Ali Alnaggar Victor Armstrong.  While Canada’s National Energy Strategy (NES) is much in line with the BC Clean Energy Act / IRP, Market.
April 29, 2015 Lucinda Smith Climate Action Plan Process.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
Clean Energy and the Smart Grid Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Conference May 19, 2010 George Twigg, Deputy Policy Director.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
Cap and Trade and the Western Climate Initiative December 10,
Econ Winter 2012: Professor Bushnell California’s Carbon Market: Choices and Challenges James Bushnell University of California at Davis.
Climate Change Steering Committee’s Draft Climate Change Report September 5, 2008 Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council.
Opportunities for Natural Gas Efficiency in Pennsylvania Presented to Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance September 20, 2011 Steven Nadel American Council.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
1 October 22, 2009 NESCAUM Low Carbon Fuel Standards Stakeholder Meeting Transportation Fuels Panel Boston, Massachusetts Watson Collins Manager, Business.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
Revis James Director Energy Technology Assessment Center 2010 AABE Conference May 20, 2010 Creating a Low-Carbon Future EPRI’s 2009 Prism- MERGE Study.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Implications of State Climate Change Policies for the Utility Sector Josh Bushinsky State Solutions Fellow Pew Center on.
Comments on Northeast Regional Electric Sector Carbon Cap (RGGI) Model Rule Rob Sargent, Senior Energy Policy Analyst May 2 nd, 2006 Hartford, CT.
State Climate Policy Solutions For a new, stronger, clean energy economy State Climate Policy Solutions For a new, stronger, clean energy economy NCEL
Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Group September 21, 2005.
RGGI Model Rule Preliminary Comments Alan Nogee Clean Energy Program Director Union of Concerned Scientists May 2, 2006 Hartford, CT.
California Energy Commission Draft 2015 Integrated Energy Policy Report October 20, 2015 Presented by Heather Raitt Assistant Executive Director for Policy.
Findings from the Multi-Sector Working Group Future Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the WRTC.
Harnessing Clean: Sameer Ranade Washington Environmental Council/Alliance for Jobs and Clean Energy.
The Debate about Carbon taxing vs. Cap and Trade I.Cap and Trade: What is it and how does it work? II.Carbon tax: How does this work and what is the intended.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
1 Proposed Final Opinion on GHG Strategies in the Energy Sectors Key Findings and Recommendations October 16, 2008.
October 26, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results RPS Sensitivity & Very High Emissions Reference and Package Cases.
Australia's 2030 climate change emissions reduction target – abatement potential May 2016.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
EFFICIENCY FIRST FOR MISSOURI’S ENERGY FUTURE Becky Stanfield, NRDC October 21, 2014 MPSC Statewide Collaborative Meeting.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
Butte County Climate Action Plan Contract for Services December 11, 2012 Butte County Department of Development Services Tim Snellings, Director.
Maryland Commission on Climate Change 5/23/16 Mark Kresowik Deputy Director.
NO x Trading Success in the Northeast: Observations and Lessons Andrew Aulisi World Resources Institute RGGI Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 New.
Sausalito City Council May 7, 2013 Plan Bay Area Draft EIR.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
The Canadian Energy Research Institute and Friends of AIMS Present:
Canadian Energy Research Institute
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
Karl Vella - EURELECTRIC
Maryland Commission on Climate Change 5/23/16
LEVERAGING US EXPERIENCE: INDIA’s ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY ROAD MAP
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY SCENARIOS - BULGARIA
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: First auction results & the future
Presentation to British Institute of Energy Economics
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Formerly ENE/ Environment Northeast
Maryland Commission on Climate Change 5/23/16
Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009
Durham Community Energy Plan
California’s Clean Energy Future
Scaling up of Renewable Energy for Power Generation in the Western Balkan countries
Decarbonizing/Electrifying the Building Sector
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Global Status Report for COP
Presentation transcript:

Maryland Commission on Climate Change 5/23/16 Mark Kresowik Deputy Director

RGGI has been a success for Maryland “RESI’s 2015 Study estimated that RGGI, once fully operational, would support a total of 96 to 1,015 jobs by 2020, $94,970,706 to $322,862,295 in net economic output and $117,721,558 to $770,226,749 in wages over the lifetime of the program.” - Maryland Department of the Environment

RGGI has been a success for Maryland

More success – state adopts MCCC 2030 goal

Maryland’s goal is in line with other states

- Connecticut Governor’s Council on Climate Change Those states are figuring this out too “the only viable path to deep reductions in GHG emissions is through a combination of reduced energy consumption (through increased energy efficiency in vehicles and buildings), expanded availability of clean electricity, and electrification of the transportation and heating sectors… The scope of the challenge can be summarized in three words: reduce, electrify, and decarbonize.” - MA Clean Energy and Climate Plan - Connecticut Governor’s Council on Climate Change

So we looked at the most cost effective path Synapse analysis: RGGI limits aligned with Maryland’s goal and electrifying vehicles and heating will save customers $25.7 billion through 2030 and create an average of nearly 60,000 new jobs annually

MCCC should support RGGI cap consistent with goal Equivalent RGGI cap would be 5% annual decline from 2020 levels through 2030: slightly less ambitious than pollution reduction trajectory achieved to date in region - Natural Resources Defense Council comments to RGGI stakeholder process

Other elements Partnering outside the region: require comparable stringency RGGI covers both existing and new pollution sources RGGI caps pollution and invests revenues (100% auction) RGGI has a floor price for allowances Cost Containment Reserve Needs Reform Can allow pollution above the necessary targets Can perversely drive prices up in the short term Better mechanisms to protect businesses and families exist Offsets not a solution Need to reduce pollution from all sectors to hit Maryland goals Not allowed under the Clean Power Plan Better mechanisms to protect businesses and families exist

Learn lessons from RGGI for transportation

Equity needs to be front and center

Equity needs to be front and center

Equity needs to be front and center

Engage overburdened and underserved communities

Increasing equity and empowerment Cap and reduce both pollution and energy cost burden 2. Conduct environmental justice and cumulative impact analyses on policies 3. Direct revenues from RGGI and transportation pricing to overburdened and underserved communities 4. Enact apprenticeship and workforce development programs 5. Enable clean renewable energy (shared solar), electric buses, and charging infrastructure investment in underserved communities

Discussion: - Feedback on Plan - Next Steps