Mere Christianity Chap 1 Section 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Taylor - argument for God from contingency & necessity ~ slide 1 Richard Taylor’s argument for God from contingency & necessity 1. Basic datum - the very.
Advertisements

The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Beyond reasonable doubt? week 3 - right and wrong.
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
Looking at the Roots of Philosophy
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
66 As soon as it was day, the elders of the people, both chief priests and scribes, came together and led Him into their council, saying, 67 “If You are.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Lecture 3: The nature of epistemic justification.
Rivermont Presbyterian Church P. Ribeiro 1 Mere Christianity C.S. Lewis Book I Right and Wrong As A Clue To The Meaning Of The Universe Summary of Chapters.
Believing in God (need Christian knowledge only in this unit) Revise key aspects of the unit Create set of revision notes.
The Cosmological Argument Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation?
Introduction to Physical Science Chapter 1 The Nature of Science.
Part 1: The Little Three. M. C. Escher There are only two places for things to exist… In our minds Or Outside our minds.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
This section of the examination specification requires you to look at: Reasons why some people believe in God Reasons why some people do not believe in.
Believing in God (You only need Christian knowledge in this unit) Revise key aspects of the unit Create set of revision notes.
Mere Christianity C. S. Lewis. The Law of Human Nature Chapter 1 Two basic points: –Human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they.
How we see God… We are learning to ….. Consider why there are many different understandings of what God is like.
The Cosmological Argument Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation?
Create Your own Destiny. Thoughts Are Things In presenting this, it is my desire to give an individual something to think about. We must be more mindful.
Scientific Method. Science: Further Info Science cannot provide certain (100%) proof – just the ‘best’ working theories based on the evidence that we.
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Matt Slick debating techniques: part 2
What is our new topic about?
Know God John 4:39-42 Pastor Keone.
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave
SCIENCE & KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
Thesis Statements and topic sentences
What is Science?.
Explaining the universe
Philosophy.
Existence of God (ctd) Lesson 4
Thinking Like a Scientist
John Locke – Two Treatises of Government
Plato’s Allegory of the Cave
Spiritual Opportunity Questions
Rationalism.
To be able to.
The Cosmological Argument
Irish bishop and philosopher
mended when church wounds
Think pair share What type of argument is the cosmological argument?
Faulty Reasoning What’s wrong with this statement?
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Recap Questions What is interactionism?
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Objections to the Design Argument
The Existence of God Theology.
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
Properties of the Real Numbers Part I
What did I google to find this picture?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
The study of the nature of reality
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation? Think, pair, share.
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
What is Science?.
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Chapter 3 The Idea Of Causation on Social Research
The Problem of Personal Identity
Argument 1 Argument 2 Argument 3
What is Science?.
JOSH EXPLAINS JOHN TYLER WITHOUT BLOWING ANYTHING UP THIS TIME.
Philosophical Methodology
‘Assess the credibility of the cosmological argument’ (12 marks)
Theory of Solipsism Ioanna Panourgia.
Difficult Conversation
History of Western Philosophy in Five Minutes
Ethics, Philosophy and Religion
Presentation transcript:

Mere Christianity Chap 1 Section 4

Basic competing philosophies Ever since men were able to think, they have wondered about the reality of the universe Generally been two opinions (materialist & religious view) or

Materialist v. Religious View (Basic outlines of each approach) The materialist view is not new (Atomist school in Greece, Thales & Anaxagoras) The physical world is all there is, has always existed, and nobody knows why The world exists almost by ‘a fluke’ The religious view believes something ‘like a mind’ is behind the universe (ordering it) It is conscious, has purposes, and prefers one thing to another

Doesn’t science answer that? Science can’t determine which view is right (it’s asking different kinds questions) Science works by experiments, so every scientific statement (however complex) in the long run says “I pointed the telescope to such and such a part of the sky at 2:20 a.m. on January 15th and saw so-and-so” or “I put some of this stuff in a pot and heated it to such-and-such temperature and it did so-and-so” NOT speaking against science, only stating its job

mee mee MEE! IF there is anything behind the universe, science won’t be able to reveal it If science ever becomes ‘complete’ so that everything that can be known is known, “Why is there a universe?” would remain unanswered. Science focuses on “What,” “When,” or How.” “Why” in science is really “how” --TS

The “Why” to life would be unanswered except for our ‘internal life’ Studying man from the outside would reveal nothing—they’d see our actions only We see the disconnect between “ought” and “does” We can’t study stones/weather from ‘the inside’ only ourselves We can look inward and study ourselves These guys make no sense…

Architect isn’t the house THE Question: Does the universe just exist for no reason, or is there a power behind it? IF it exists, it won’t be part of the observed data, but an influence on the data. E.g. The architect is not one of the walls or stairs, but is ‘behind’ them This power would show itself as an influence on us, not as part of the world. (isn’t that what we experience?) architect house

The ‘interior’ life of man Imagine a man in a blue uniform who delivered paper packets at each house. I assume the packets are letters at the other house, because that’s what I got. I explain the unopened with the information I am allowed to open (my letter). The only ‘letter’ we get to open is Man. And Man speaks of ‘something’ beyond.

Hold Up… I am not arguing for a Christian God. Only that this power behaves more like a mind than a ‘force’