Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Advertisements

6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
5.5Asset Allocation Across Risky and Risk Free Portfolios 5-1.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN INVESTMENTS.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Chapter.
FIN352 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Asset Pricing Models (chapter 9)
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Chapter 8 Portfolio Selection.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 7 Optimal Risky Portfolios 1.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 7 Optimal Risky Portfolios 1.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue
1 Fin 2802, Spring 10 - Tang Chapter 6: Asset Allocation Fina2802: Investments and Portfolio Analysis Spring, 2010 Dragon Tang Lecture 9 Capital Allocation.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Model Chapter 11 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS ©2011 The McGraw-Hill Companies CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets.
Portfolio Theory & Capital Asset Pricing Model
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free Asset
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue 5 Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 9 The Capital Asset Pricing Model.
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Risk Premiums and Risk Aversion
Optimal Risky Portfolios
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Version 1.2 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the work should be mailed to:
Finding the Efficient Set
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Return: Past and Prologue 5 Bodie, Kane, and Marcus.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Portfolio risk and return measurement Module 5.2.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Chapter Seven Optimal Risky Portfolios Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risk Assets.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.
5-1 CHAPTER 5 Risk and Rates of Return Rates of Return Holding Period Return: Rates of Return over a given period Suppose the price of a share.
Investments, 8 th edition Bodie, Kane and Marcus Slides by Susan Hine McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 6 Risk Aversion and.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.
Chapter 5 Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
FIN437 Vicentiu Covrig 1 Portfolio management Optimum asset allocation Optimum asset allocation (see chapter 8 RN)
1 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Lecture # 35 Shahid A. Zia Dr. Shahid A. Zia.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Return and Risk Lecture 2 Calculation of Covariance
Optimal Risky Portfolios
Capital Market Theory: An Overview
Key Concepts and Skills
Return and Risk The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Second Canadian Edition
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue
Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Portfolio Theory & Related Topics
Return and Risk: The Capital Asset Pricing Models: CAPM and APT
Portfolio Selection (chapter 8)
6 Efficient Diversification Bodie, Kane and Marcus
Chapter 19 Jones, Investments: Analysis and Management
Portfolio Selection 8/28/2018 Dr.P.S DoMS, SAPM V unit.
Portfolio Selection Chapter 8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Risk and Return: Past and Prologue
Risk and Risk Aversion Chapter 6.
Optimal Risky Portfolios
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Capital Allocation Between The Risky And The Risk-Free Asset
2. Building efficient portfolios
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation to Risky Assets
Figure 6.1 Risk as Function of Number of Stocks in Portfolio
5 Risk and Return: Past and Prologue Bodie, Kane and Marcus
Risk Aversion and Capital Allocation
Presentation transcript:

Capital Allocation to Risky Assets Chapter Six Capital Allocation to Risky Assets Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.

Chapter Overview Risk aversion and its estimation Two-step process of portfolio construction Composition of risky portfolio Capital allocation between risky and risk-free assets Passive strategies and the capital market line (CML)

Risk and Risk Aversion Speculation Gamble Taking considerable risk for a commensurate gain Parties have heterogeneous expectations Bet on an uncertain outcome for enjoyment Parties assign the same probabilities to the possible outcomes

Risk and Risk Aversion Utility Values Investors are willing to consider: Risk-free assets Speculative positions with positive risk premiums Portfolio attractiveness increases with expected return and decreases with risk What happens when return increases with risk?

Table 6.1 Available Risky Portfolios Each portfolio receives a utility score to assess the investor’s risk/return trade off

Risk Aversion and Utility Values Utility Function U = Utility E(r) = Expected return on the asset or portfolio A = Coefficient of risk aversion σ2 = Variance of returns ½ = A scaling factor

Table 6.2 Utility Scores of Portfolios with Varying Degrees of Risk Aversion

Estimating Risk Aversion Use questionnaires Observe individuals’ decisions when confronted with risk Observe how much people are willing to pay to avoid risk

Estimating Risk Aversion Mean-Variance (M-V) Criterion Portfolio A dominates portfolio B if: and

Capital Allocation Across Risky and Risk-Free Portfolios Asset Allocation The choice among broad asset classes that represents a very important part of portfolio construction The simplest way to control risk is to manipulate the fraction of the portfolio invested in risk-free assets versus the portion invested in the risky assets

Basic Asset Allocation Example Total market value $300,000 Risk-free money market fund $90,000 Equities $113,400 Bonds (long-term) $96,600 Total risk assets $210,000

Basic Asset Allocation Example Let y = Weight of the risky portfolio, P, in the complete portfolio (1-y) = Weight of risk-free assets

The Risk-Free Asset Only the government can issue default-free securities A security is risk-free in real terms only if its price is indexed and maturity is equal to investor’s holding period T-bills viewed as “the” risk-free asset Money market funds also considered risk-free in practice

Figure 6.3 Spread Between 3-Month CD and T-bill Rates

Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset It’s possible to create a complete portfolio by splitting investment funds between safe and risky assets Let y = Portion allocated to the risky portfolio, P (1 - y) = Portion to be invested in risk-free asset, F

One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset: Example rf = 7% E(rp) = 15% rf = 0% p = 22% The expected return on the complete portfolio: The risk of the complete portfolio:

One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset: Example Rearrange and substitute y = σC/σP:

Figure 6.4 The Investment Opportunity Set

Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset Capital allocation line with leverage Lend at rf = 7% and borrow at rf = 9% Lending range slope = 8/22 = 0.36 Borrowing range slope = 6/22 = 0.27 CAL kinks at P

Figure 6.5 The Opportunity Set with Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates

Risk Tolerance and Asset Allocation The investor must choose one optimal portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choices Expected return of the complete portfolio: Variance:

Table 6.4 Utility Levels for Various Positions in Risky Assets

Figure 6.6 Utility as a Function of Allocation to the Risky Asset, y

Table 6.5 Spreadsheet Calculations of Indifference Curves

Figure 6. 7 Indifference Curves for U =. 05 and U = Figure 6.7 Indifference Curves for U = .05 and U = .09 with A = 2 and A = 4

Figure 6.8 Finding the Optimal Complete Portfolio

Table 6.6 Expected Returns on Four Indifference Curves and the CAL

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line The passive strategy avoids any direct or indirect security analysis Supply and demand forces may make such a strategy a reasonable choice for many investors A natural candidate for a passively held risky asset would be a well-diversified portfolio of common stocks such as the S&P 500

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line The Capital Market Line (CML) Is a capital allocation line formed investment in two passive portfolios: Virtually risk-free short-term T-bills (or a money market fund) Fund of common stocks that mimics a broad market index

Passive Strategies: The Capital Market Line From 1926 to 2012, the passive risky portfolio offered an average risk premium of 8.1% with a standard deviation of 20.48%, resulting in a reward-to-volatility ratio of .40