Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Data Nonerythroid alpha spectrin prevents telomere dysfunction after DNA interstrand cross-link damage Pan Zhang, Utz Herbig, Frederick Coffman.
Advertisements

Chemical Targeting of a G-Quadruplex RNA in the Ebola Virus L Gene
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Jan-Philipp Mallm, Karsten Rippe  Cell Reports 
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
FGL2 prothrombinase contributes to the early stage of coronary microvascular obstruction through a fibrin-dependent pathway  Wen-Zhu Li, Yi Yang, Kun.
RNA-DNA Triplex Formation by Long Noncoding RNAs
Generating Late-Onset Human iPSC-Based Disease Models by Inducing Neuronal Age- Related Phenotypes through Telomerase Manipulation  Elsa Vera, Nazario.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Unbiased Proteomic Profiling Strategy for Discovery of Bacterial Effector Proteins Reveals that Salmonella Protein PheA Is a Host Cell Cycle Regulator 
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
SMARCAL1 Resolves Replication Stress at ALT Telomeres
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
The DNA Damage Machinery and Homologous Recombination Pathway Act Consecutively to Protect Human Telomeres  Ramiro E. Verdun, Jan Karlseder  Cell  Volume.
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Ramiro E. Verdun, Laure Crabbe, Candy Haggblom, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
Activin Signals through SMAD2/3 to Increase Photoreceptor Precursor Yield during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation  Amy Q. Lu, Evgenya Y. Popova, Colin.
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Synthetic Oligonucleotides Inhibit CRISPR-Cpf1-Mediated Genome Editing
Biallelic transcription of Igf2 and H19 in individual cells suggests a post-transcriptional contribution to genomic imprinting  Y Jouvenot, F Poirier,
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e9 (September 2017)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
SIRT1 Is Necessary for Proficient Telomere Elongation and Genomic Stability of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells  Maria Luigia De Bonis, Sagrario Ortega,
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Chemical Targeting of a G-Quadruplex RNA in the Ebola Virus L Gene
Mahesh Ramamoorthy, Susan Smith  Cancer Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Gemcitabine-Incorporated G-Quadruplex Aptamer for Targeted Drug Delivery into Pancreas Cancer  Jun Young Park, Ye Lim Cho, Ju Ri Chae, Sung Hwan Moon,
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2018)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1261-1270 (October 2016) Conformation Selective Antibody Enables Genome Profiling and Leads to Discovery of Parallel G-Quadruplex in Human Telomeres  Hui-Yun Liu, Qi Zhao, Tian-Peng Zhang, Yue Wu, Yun-Xia Xiong, Shi-Ke Wang, Yuan-Long Ge, Jin-Hui He, Peng Lv, Tian-Miao Ou, Jia- Heng Tan, Ding Li, Lian-Quan Gu, Jian Ren, Yong Zhao, Zhi-Shu Huang  Cell Chemical Biology  Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1261-1270 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Binding Specificity of the D1 Antibody for Parallel G-Quadruplexes (A) Binding selectivity was determined using ELISA and revealed that the D1 antibody had a high affinity for parallel DNA but had undetectable binding to antiparallel G4 DNA, hybrid G4 DNA, double-stranded DNA, random single-stranded DNA, and a DNA hairpin. The error bars represent the SEM calculated from three replicates. (B) Further specificity testing of D1 for parallel G-quadruplex binding was performed using competition ELISA. The error bars represent the SEM calculated from three replicates. (C) ELISA binding curves of D1-DNA interactions were determined. The dissociation constants (Kd) are indicated. The error bars represent the SEM calculated from three replicates. (D) Binding selectivity of D1 for parallel G4 DNA in the cell context was assessed. The arrows indicate the merged foci of D1 and MYC. D1 co-localized with MYC but not with TBA. (E) Quantification of D1 and Cy5-DNA merged foci ratios in the nuclei. In each group, 30 to 50 nuclei were counted. Means with SEM were calculated and presented. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Determination of the Consensus Sequence for Parallel G-Quadruplexes Formation in the Genome by ChIP-Seq (A) The top five parallel G4 motifs generated by GLAM2 from the G4 sequences extracted from the top 200 peaks. (B) The statistics of base length distribution between two G tracts. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detection and Determination of Parallel G-Quadruplexes by D1 in Human Telomeres (A) Telomere repeat enrichment analyses. The telomeric fragments were defined as containing more than three TTAGGG/CCCTAA occurrences. (B) Telomeric ChIP on SiHa cells. Dot blots were hybridized with a TTAGGG repeat probe, and the data representing the percent of the TTAGGG repeat DNA recovered in each ChIP were quantified. The average of duplicate signals obtained with 10-fold amplified input DNA samples were used as 100% value for the quantification. The error bars represent the SEM calculated from two replicates. (C) D1 and TRF2 co-staining in SiHa cells with or without RNase-1/DNase treatments. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). The dotted outline represents the nuclear borders according to the white light image. Scale bars, 5 μm. (D) Quantification of D1 and TRF2 merged foci number in the nuclei. In each group, 50 to 100 nuclei were counted. Means with SEM were calculated and presented. ***p < 0.001; NS, not significant. (E) Determination of the G4 conformations in human telomeres. Telomeric G4 structures were co-stained with TRF2 and D1 or BG4. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. (F) Quantification of D1/BG4 and TRF2 merged foci numbers in the nucleus. In each group, 50 to 100 nuclei were counted. Means with SEM were calculated and presented. ***p < 0.001; NS, not significant. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Regulation of Endogenous Parallel G-Quadruplex Structures in the Telomeres by Parallel G4 Specific Small Molecular Ligands (A) CD spectra of the conformation of 5 μM hTELO in K+ solutions with or without 25 μM NMM/QPB-15e/ber8. (B) ELISA binding curves of D1 for NMM/QPB-15e-induced parallel G-quadruplexes in the telomeres. The error bars represent the SEM calculated from three replicates. (C) Increased D1-TRF2 co-staining in cells treated with NMM/QPB-15e and decreased D1-TRF2 co-staining in cells treated with Ber8 following RNase-1 treatment. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. (D) Quantification of D1 foci number (green), TRF2 foci number (red), and D1-TRF2 merged foci number (yellow) in the nuclei with or without NMM/QPB-15e/Ber8 treatment. Between 50 and 100 nuclei were counted. Means with SEM were calculated and presented. ***p < 0.001; NS, not significant. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Variation in the Abundance of Parallel G-Quadruplexes in the Telomeres as a Function of the Cell-Cycle Stages (A) Dynamic variation of parallel quadruplexes in the telomeres of cell-cycle-synchronized SiHa cells and untreated SiHa cells. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Quantification of D1 foci numbers (green) and D1-TRF2 merged foci numbers (yellow) in the nuclei of G0/G1, G1/S, S phase, and untreated cells. Between 50 and 100 nuclei were counted. Means with SEM were calculated and presented. ***p < 0.001; NS, not significant. Cell Chemical Biology 2016 23, 1261-1270DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.08.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions