Comparison of four techniques for the fixation of a collagen scaffold in the human cadaveric knee  M. Drobnič, M.D., M.Sc., D. Radosavljevič, M.D., D. Ravnik, M.D., Ph.D., V. Pavlovčič, M.D., Ph.D., M. Hribernik, M.D., Ph.D.  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 337-344 (April 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.11.007 Copyright © 2005 OsteoArthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 The human cadaveric inferior extremity was strapped to the CPM device after the completion of scaffold implantation. Motion from full extension (left image) to 90° of flexion (right image) was exercised. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2006 14, 337-344DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2005.11.007) Copyright © 2005 OsteoArthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Collagen fleece scaffolds fixed with four techniques, SA, FS, BS, and PC, before (upper images) and after (lower images) 150 cycles of CPM. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2006 14, 337-344DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2005.11.007) Copyright © 2005 OsteoArthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Collagen fleece scaffolds fixed with three techniques, FS, BS, and PC, after 150 cycles of CPM plus additional 50 cycles of 10kg loading (upper images), and after another 50 cycles of 20kg loading (lower images). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2006 14, 337-344DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2005.11.007) Copyright © 2005 OsteoArthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions