Introduction to Randomization Tests

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Simple Introduction to Statistical Significance Julie Graves MST Conference June 2014.
Advertisements

1 Parametric Empirical Bayes Methods for Microarrays 3/7/2011 Copyright © 2011 Dan Nettleton.
Introduction to Basic Statistical Methodology. CHAPTER 1 ~ Introduction ~
1 Introduction to Experimental Design 1/26/2009 Copyright © 2009 Dan Nettleton.
Objectives (BPS chapter 15)
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision
Statistical Treatment of Data Significant Figures : number of digits know with certainty + the first in doubt. Rounding off: use the same number of significant.
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 8 Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample.
Section 9.1 Introduction to Statistical Tests 9.1 / 1 Hypothesis testing is used to make decisions concerning the value of a parameter.
Statistics 101 Chapter 10. Section 10-1 We want to infer from the sample data some conclusion about a wider population that the sample represents. Inferential.
{ Chapter 4: Designing Studies 4.3 Using Studies Wisely.
Introductions NAME HOME TOWN FIELD OF RESEARCH AND/OR MAJOR SOMETHING FUN THAT YOU DID THIS SUMMER.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Slide
Aim: How can we assign experimental units to treatments in a way that is fair to all of the treatments?
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups 10.1.
Statistical Significance The power of ALPHA. “ Significant ” in the statistical sense does not mean “ important. ” It means simply “ not likely to happen.
1 Estimation of Gene-Specific Variance 2/17/2011 Copyright © 2011 Dan Nettleton.
Hypothesis Testing Introduction to Statistics Chapter 8 Feb 24-26, 2009 Classes #12-13.
Introduction to Testing a Hypothesis Testing a treatment Descriptive statistics cannot determine if differences are due to chance. Sampling error means.
1 Introduction to Randomization Tests 3/7/2011 Copyright © 2011 Dan Nettleton.
4.3 Using Studies Wisely Objective SWBAT Describe the scope of inference that is appropriate in a statistical study.
Learning Objectives After this section, you should be able to: The Practice of Statistics, 5 th Edition1 DESCRIBE the shape, center, and spread of the.
A Quantitative Overview to Gene Expression Profiling in Animal Genetics Armidale Animal Breeding Summer Course, UNE, Feb Analysis of (cDNA) Microarray.
Producing Data 1.
Chapter Nine Hypothesis Testing.
Estimation of Gene-Specific Variance
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
ANOVA Econ201 HSTS212.
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
CHAPTER 10 Estimating with Confidence
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Planning and Conducting a Study
WARM – UP A local newspaper conducts a poll to predict the outcome of a Senate race. After conducting a random sample of 1200 voters, they find 52% support.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Tests of significance: The basics
What does it mean to say that the results of an experiment are (or are not) statistically significant? The significance level,  (conventionally set to.
Incomplete Block Experimental Designs
Accel Precalculus Unit #1: Data Analysis Lesson #4: Introduction to Statistics.
MATH 2311 Section 4.4.
Chapter 9.1: Sampling Distributions
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Research Strategies: How Psychologists Ask and Answer Questions
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Introduction to Basic Statistical Methodology
Incomplete Block Experimental Designs
Introduction to Mixed Linear Models in Microarray Experiments
Basic Practice of Statistics - 3rd Edition Introduction to Inference
Experiments We wish to conduct an experiment to see the effect of alcohol (explanatory variable) on reaction time (response variable).
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Introduction to Experimental Design
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Principles of Experimental Design
Introduction to the design (and analysis) of experiments
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Vocab unit 2 Research.
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
CHAPTER 11 Inference for Distributions of Categorical Data
Principles of Experimental Design
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Randomization Tests 3/12/2009 Copyright © 2009 Dan Nettleton

An Example Suppose I have an instrument that measures the mRNA transcript abundance of a certain gene. I have developed a drug that I suspect will alter the expression of that gene when the drug is injected into a rat. I randomly divide a group of eight rats into two groups of four. Each rat in one group is injected with the drug. Each rat in the other group is injected with a control substance.

Hypothetical Data I use my instrument to measure the expression of the gene in each rat after treatment and obtain the following results: Control Drug Expression 9 12 14 17 18 21 23 26 Average 13 22 The difference in averages is 22-13=9. I wish to claim that this difference was caused by the drug.

Interpretation of the Results Clearly there is some natural variation in expression (not due to treatment) because the expression measures differ among rats within each treatment group. Maybe the observed difference (22-13=9) showed up simply because I happened to choose the rats with larger expression for injection with the drug. What is the chance of seeing such a large difference in treatment means if the drug has no effect?

Random Difference Assignment Control Drug in Averages 1 9 12 14 17 18 21 23 26 9.0 2 9 12 14 18 17 21 23 26 8.5 3 9 12 14 21 17 18 23 26 7.0 4 9 12 14 23 17 18 21 26 6.0 5 9 12 14 26 17 18 21 23 4.5 6 9 12 17 18 14 21 23 26 7.0 7 9 12 17 21 14 18 23 26 5.5 8 9 12 17 23 14 18 21 26 4.5 9 9 12 17 26 14 18 21 23 3.0 10 9 12 18 21 14 17 23 26 5.0 11 9 12 18 23 14 17 21 26 4.0 12 9 12 18 26 14 17 21 23 2.5 13 9 12 21 23 14 17 18 26 2.5 14 9 12 21 26 14 17 18 23 1.0 15 9 12 23 26 14 17 18 21 0.0   69 18 21 23 26 9 12 14 17 -8.5 70 18 21 23 26 9 12 14 17 -9.0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Distribution of Difference between Treatment Means Assuming No Treatment Effect Number of Random Assignments Difference in Treatment Means (Control – Drug)

Conclusions Only 2 of the 70 possible random assignments would have led to a difference between treatment means as large as 9. Thus, under the assumption of no drug effect, the chance of seeing a difference as large as we observed was 2/70 = 0.0286. Because 0.0286 is a small probability, we have reason to attribute the observed difference to the effect of the drug rather than a coincidence due to the way we assigned our experimental units to treatment groups.

Randomization Test This is an example of a randomization test. R.A. Fisher described such tests in the first half of the 20th century. Randomization tests are closely related to permutation tests (almost synonymous) which are popular for assessing statistical significance because they do not rely on specific distributional assumptions.