Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Advertisements

Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Hans-Peter Raué, Carol Beadling, Jennifer Haun, Mark K. Slifka 
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
miR-150-Mediated Foxo1 Regulation Programs CD8+ T Cell Differentiation
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Lung Airway-Surveilling CXCR3hi Memory CD8+ T Cells Are Critical for Protection against Influenza A Virus  Bram Slütter, Lecia L. Pewe, Susan M. Kaech,
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
The mTOR Kinase Determines Effector versus Memory CD8+ T Cell Fate by Regulating the Expression of Transcription Factors T-bet and Eomesodermin  Rajesh.
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Cell-Intrinsic IL-27 and gp130 Cytokine Receptor Signaling Regulates Virus-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses and Viral Control during Chronic Infection 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e8 (April 2018)
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 833-845 (November 2013) Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 Sustains CD8+ T Cell Expansion and Effector Differentiation  Shuyu Yao, Bruno Fernando Buzo, Duy Pham, Li Jiang, Elizabeth J. Taparowsky, Mark H. Kaplan, Jie Sun  Immunity  Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 833-845 (November 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 mTOR Signaling Regulates IRF4 Expression in CD8+ T Cells (A and B) IRF4 mRNA (A) and protein expression (B) in polyclonal CD8+ T cells after activation in vitro. (C) OT-I T cells were transferred in Thy1 mismatched mice and then the mice were infected with PR8-OVA. IRF4 expression in OT-I T cells in draining MLN at day 3.5 p.i. (D) IRF4 expression in OT-I T cells stimulated with N4, T4, or Q4H7 peptide. (E) mTOR signaling in OT-I cells as indicated by S6 phosphorylation after 24 hr N4, T4, or Q4H7 peptide stimulation. (F) IRF4 expression in polyclonal CD8+ T cells after vehicle (DMSO) or rapamycin (Rapa) treatment. (G) IRF4 MFI of OT-I cells stimulated with N4 or T4 in the presence of DMSO or Rapa at 24 hr after stimulation. Data are representative of two to four independent experiments. See also Figure S1. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IRF4 Ablation in CD8+ T Cells Impairs the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses In Vivo (A) Irf4ΔT mice were infected with influenza. Influenza-specific NP366 and PA224 tetramer staining in lung, MLN, and spleen CD8+ T cells at day 7 p.i. (B) GFP expression spleen CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in naive Irf4ΔT and Irf4ΔCD8 mice. (C–E) Irf4ΔCD8 mice were infected with influenza. Representative plots of NP366 and PA224 tetramer staining (C), percent of NP366 and PA224 tetramer+ cells in lung, MLN, and spleen CD8+ T cells (D), and the numbers of NP366 and PA224 tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in lung, MLN, and spleen (E) at days 7 and 9 p.i. Data are mean ± SEM. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (n = 3–4 mice per group per experiment). ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S2. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 IRF4 Is Dispensable for Early T Cell Activation but Vital for CD8+ T Cell Expansion (A) CD25 and CD69 expression of control or IRF4-deficient polycolonal CD8+ T cells (day 1 after activation). (B) IL-2 in the cultured medium of control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells (day 1 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. (C) Cell numbers of control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells after stimulation. Data are mean ± SD. (D) Cell numbers of OT-I T cells stimulated with N4, T4, or Q4H7 peptide. Data are mean ± SD. (E) 7-AAD staining of control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells in the culture. (F) The percentages of 7-AAD+ cells in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells in the culture (day 2 after activation). (G) The percentages of active caspase 3+ cells in the live control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells (day 2 after activation). (H) Proliferation of control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (I) The percentages of active caspase 3+ cells in the live WT or BATF-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells (day 2 after activation). (J) Proliferation of WT or BATF-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (K and L) WT CD8+ T cells were left untransduced or transduced with control or IRF4-expressing retroviruses. hCD4 staining (K) and the percentages (L) of hCD4+ cells in live CD8+ T cells at day 2 and day 4 after activation. (M) OT-I T cells were stimulated with N4, T4, or Q4H7 peptide and transduced with control or IRF4-expressing retrovirus. The percentages of hCD4+ cells in live OT-I T cells were monitored. Data are representative of two to four independent experiments except in (F) and (L), wherein data are pooled from four independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S3. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 IRF4 Regulates CD8+ T Cell Expansion by Repressing CDK Inhibitors and Bim (A) Expression of various CDK inhibitors in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (B) Expression of various CDK inhibitors in WT or BATF-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (C) IRF4 binding to Cdkn2a locus in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells was determined by ChIP assay (day 2 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. (D and E) Bim mRNA (Bcl2l11) (D) and protein (E) expression in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells at indicated times (D) or day 2 (E) after activation. (F and G) Bim mRNA (Bcl2l11) (F) and protein (G) expression in control or BATF-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells at indicated times (F) or day 2 (G) after activation. (H) IRF4 binding to Bcl2l11 locus in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells was determined by ChIP (day 2 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. Data are representative of three to four independent experiments. See also Figure S4. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Selective Ablation of IRF4 in CD8+ T Cells Impairs CD8+ T Cell Proliferation and Survival In Vivo Control or Irf4ΔCD8 mice were infected with influenza and injected with BrdU at day 7 p.i. (A) The percentages of BrdU+ cells in lung or MLN PA224 tetramer+ T cells. Data are mean ± SEM. (B) The percentages of active caspase 3+ cells in lung or MLN PA224 tetramer+ T cells. Data are mean ± SEM. (C) Bim expression in lung or MLN PA224 tetramer+ T cells. Data are representative of three independent experiments (n = 3–4 mice per group per experiment). ∗p < 0.05. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 IRF4 Sustains CD8+ T Cell Effector Differentiation (A and B) Gzmb mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (C) IFN-γ production in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells after PMA and ionomycin stimulation. (D) IFN-γ production in MIT or MIT-Bcl2 retrovirus-transduced control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells after PMA and ionomycin stimulation at day 3 after activation. (E) Blimp1 mRNA (Prdm1) expression in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (F) IRF4 binding to Prdm1 promoter, CNS9, and 3-prime loci in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells was determined by ChIP (day 2 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. (G and H) T-bet mRNA (Tbx21) (G) and protein (H) expression in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells. (I) T-bet binding to Gzmb and Ifng promoters in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells was determined by ChIP assay (day 2 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. (J and K) H3K27 acetylation and H3K4 methylation in Ifng (J) and Gzmb (K) promoter regions in control or IRF4-deficient polyclonal CD8+ T cells were determined by ChIP (day 2 after activation). Data are mean ± SD. (L) IFN-γ production by control or IRF4-expressing retrovirus-transduced WT polyclonal CD8+ T cells after PMA and ionomycin stimulation at day 4 after activation (3 days after transduction). (M) OT-I T cells were stimulated with N4, T4, or Q4H7 peptide and transduced with control or IRF4-expressing retrovirus. IFN-γ production by transduced T cells after PMA and ionomycin stimulation at day 4 after activation (3 days after transduction) is depicted. Data are representative of two to four independent experiments. See also Figure S5. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Selective Ablation of IRF4 in CD8+ T Cells Impairs CD8+ T Cell Effector Differentiation and Function In Vivo Control or Irf4ΔCD8 mice were infected with influenza. (A and B) Gzmb expression (A) and MFI (B) in total or PA224 tetramer+ T cells at day 7 p.i. (C and D) IFN-γ production (C) and MFI (D) of day 7 CD8+ T cells after stimulation with influenza-infected BMDCs. (E) IFN-γ in the BAL at day 7 p.i. (F) Influenza virus titers in the BAL at day 9 p.i. (G) Influenza virus gene (PA and M2) expression in the lung at day 9 p.i. (H) The survival of infected control or Irf4ΔCD8 mice that were depleted with CD4+ T cells. (A–E, G) Data are representative of three independent experiments (n = 3–4 mice per group per experiment). (F and H) Data are pooled from total of three independent experiments. Data are mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S6. Immunity 2013 39, 833-845DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.007) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions