Capacity, Capability, and Performance: Different Constructs or Three of a Kind? Laura Holsbeeke, MSc, Marjolijn Ketelaar, PhD, Marina M. Schoemaker, PhD, Jan Willem Gorter, MD, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 849-855 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015 Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Pearson correlations between motor capacity (GMFM-66 score), motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score), and motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score). *Significant correlation P <.001 (2-tailed) Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 849-855DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 A scatterplot of motor capacity (GMFM-66 score) versus motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 849-855DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 A scatterplot of motor capacity (GMFM-66 score) versus motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 849-855DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 As catterplot of motor capability (PEDI Functional Skills scaled mobility score) versus motor performance (PEDI Caregiver Assistance scaled mobility score); points represent single children and are based on GMFCS levels. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 849-855DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.015) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions