IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 3: Empathy Maps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design thinking basic rubric (summative edition).
Advertisements

International Ombuds Association AnnualConference 4-9, April 2014, Denver, Colorado Presented by: Steve Levecque,
Step 1 – Choose your template Objectives, scope & journey type Customer segment Moments of truth Key journey steps Actions, feelings, thoughts and reactions.
Emotion. ● A working definition: a reaction or response related to sense perceptions, internal states, thoughts, or beliefs about things or people, real.
MAKING THINKING VISIBLE Feb 6, 2012 Partnership for Professional Practice.
Week 2 Agenda Review of last week’s lessons Homework Review
The Collaborative Story
Rob Gleasure IS3320 Developing and Using Management Information Systems Lecture 13: Practical process-modelling Rob.
D.think.
Supporting School Transformation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS RCA
An Introduction to Motivational Interviewing
Rob Gleasure IS3320 Developing and Using Management Information Systems Lecture 20: Exam Revision and Semester Roundup.
IS6125 Database Analysis and Design Lecture 12: Exam Revision and Semester Roundup Rob Gleasure
Let’s think about how to have a conversation
CE101: Critical thinking Asst.Prof.Dr. Phanida Saikhwan
Take-Away Learning To understand why knowledge of how to improve learning isn’t always enough to improve learning. To identify causes and symptoms of the.
IS6117 Electronic Business Development Project Lecture 2: Personas
Introduction: Ice Breaker
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 6: Mind Mapping
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 5: Value curves and designing for qualities Rob Gleasure.
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 1: Introduction to IS4445 and interaction design Rob.
IS6117 Electronic Business Development Project Lecture 3: Empathy Maps
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 8: Use Cases and Storyboarding Rob Gleasure
What: Determine the utility of Thinking Routines to pursue our goal of increasing student understanding. Why: An apparent lack of thinking on the part.
Presented by Arseniy Mstislavskiy
Interacting with People who are Different than Us:
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 12: Semester Review and Exam Preparation Rob Gleasure.
empathize define test ideate prototype Define is a transition – it is a both a discovery and focusing stage. You focus to ground your efforts.
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 7: The 6 Thinking Hats
Building Learning Power Assembly
Rob Gleasure IS6117 Electronic Business Development Project Lecture 6: Storyboarding and Wireframes Rob Gleasure.
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 9: Sketching and Wireframing Rob Gleasure
Design Thinking.
Introduction to Mindfulness
Read the quote and with the person next to you, discuss what you think it means. Do you agree? Why / why not? Be prepared to share your thoughts with the.
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
Session 4 Creating a safe climate for discussion
Willem Fabritius IS6133 Fundamentals of Interaction Design Lecture 1: Introduction to IS6131 and interaction design Willem Fabritius.
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 11: UX audits
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 10: Testing cards
IS6117 Electronic Business Development Project Lecture 4: Journey Maps
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 6: Mind Mapping
Thinking In College In this lesson, we’ll explore what it means to be a college-level thinker, and how to develop strong thinking skills. Any questions.
Studio – Empathy & Assignment #1 Introduction to Human Computer Interaction & Design Hao-Hua Chu National Taiwan University Sept 19, 2016 *** Adapt teaching.
Last week’s Character Dare
Stakeholder Analysis Getting a better understanding of your stakeholders Any transformation or change effort includes managing stakeholder expectations.
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 4: Journey Maps
Provider Perspective Shift
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 5: Value curves
Rob Gleasure IS4446 Advanced Interaction Design Lecture 10: Designing the practices 2 (social mediators) Rob Gleasure.
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 2: Personas
Visualizing Beneficiary Experience through Journey Mapping
Creating and Feeling (copy)
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 8: Use Cases and Storyboarding Rob Gleasure
What do we know (page 1)? Define the word "Taxonomy." (Knowledge)
IS6125 Database Analysis and Design Lecture 12: Semester Review and Exam Preparation Rob Gleasure
IS6145 Database Analysis and Design Lecture 12: Semester Review and Exam Preparation Rob Gleasure
Coping with Emotions Session 4: Mindfulness Humber Recovery College
IS6133 Foundations of Interaction Design Lecture 10: Testing cards
Rob Gleasure IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 12: Semester Review and Exam Preparation Rob Gleasure.
IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 7: The 6 Thinking Hats
The Collaborative Story
Contents Introduction/Contacts Description Of Module (& LOs)
Reflective Writing.
De-escalation and Relationship Building Skills
Problem Solving Fall 2016.
Conflict Resolution Workshop LEAP
Design Thinking Works! John C. Dailey, Ph.D. Content Strategist
Social-Emotional Learning
Presentation transcript:

IS4445 Principles of Interaction Design Lecture 3: Empathy Maps Rob Gleasure R.Gleasure@ucc.ie www.robgleasure.com

Course structure Or more specifically Week 1: Introduction Week 2: Empathise 1 (personas) Week 3: Empathise 2 (empathy maps) Week 4: Define 1 (journey maps) Week 5: Define 2 (value curves) Week 6: Ideate 1 (mind maps) Week 7: Ideate 2 (6 hats) Week 8: Prototyping 1 (storyboards) Week 9: Prototyping 2 (wireframes) Week 10: Test 1 (Testing cards) Week 11: Test 2 (UX audits) Week 12: Revision

IS4445 Today’s session Online discussion Empathy maps What Why How (a template) When Where Empathy map design exercise

Online discussion How did everyone get on? What interesting personas went up?

The next impossible problem Most of whom we are, what we think, and how we experience the world occurs below the surface, meaning we often can’t or won’t externalise it We want to be human-centric, not just rational-mind-centric We need to engage with these ‘below the surface’ influences

What is an empathy map? An empathy map is a tool to help you synthesise observations and get inside the skin of your users Image from https://medium.com/whither-news/empathetic-journalism-for-the-right-23a5febb7869

What are empathy maps Empathy maps help us to dig deeper into specific personas and create less superficial or over-rationalised understandings They typically deconstruct a persona into four major components What they say What they do What they think What they feel Empathy isn’t about facts and descriptions, it’s about the reason why people do things

Why empathy maps Empathy gives us the ability to see the world from other people’s perspective and experience the world the way they do Empathy helps us understand things that questioning alone couldn’t discover Empathy =/= sympathy Empathy =/= mind-reading More fundamentally, empathy maps force us to balance real-world observations with a rich understanding of motivations and deep needs Contradictions and gaps create opportunities for new insights

How to create empathy maps Assume a beginner’s mind-set Often the biggest barrier is our reluctance to let our own perspective go Set aside all of your initial assumptions, where possible, and let yourself be dragged around to new perspectives freely Don’t jump to judgement! Look for extreme users Get out of the laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab!!! Use analogies where possible This helps you to feel what the other person is feeling If discussing with users, it also reassures those users you understand them

Exploring with questions Analysis can often be structured roughly as what-how-why Once you get the first ‘why’ answer, there is a rule of thumb that you should ask four more ‘why’ questions to get to the root cause Often called the ‘5 whys’ This technique should ultimately tell you which process/part of a process failed

A template for empathy maps Courtesy of Stanford Design Thinking Action Lab

A template for empathy maps What do they say? About the context/environment? About specific processes? About specific tools and technologies? About specific people or groups? What do they do? What decisions do they have to make and when? What are they paying attention to and when? What emotions are they visibly showing at different times? Does what they say and do contradict each other?

A template for empathy maps What do they think? About the context/environment? About specific processes? About specific tools and technologies? About specific people or groups? What do they feel? Are they happy or sad about anything? Are they angry or afraid about anything? Are they anticipating or surprised by anything? Do they trust or distrust anything?

When to use empathy maps? An empathy map should be created for each persona at the outset This empathy map should be revisited whenever you get a new piece of data, i.e. A user says something interesting you hadn’t heard them say before A user does something interesting you hadn’t seen them do before If you’re doing interviews, you may also want to create an entirely new empathy map to summarise findings as part of debriefing with the design team This can then be compared against the map for their persona

Where to use empathy maps Unsurprisingly, empathy maps are mostly used in the empathise stage They are often considered the foundation of the User Experience (UX) design They’re also important at the end of each cycle as a way of comparing users’ thoughts and feelings when using a new product/service/practice/system

Building your report Pick one persona (it doesn’t have to be the same one from last week) Sketch out an empathy map for that persona They’re also important at the end of each cycle as a way of comparing users’ thoughts and feelings when using a new product/service/practice/system

Reading Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200. Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. Theories of emotion, in Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience, Volume I, R. Plutchik and H. Kellerman (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 3-3. Interaction Design Foundation: The Basics of User Experience Design (https://www.interaction-design.org/)