Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Questionnaires For Individual Women and Men: Life Satisfaction.
Advertisements

Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Completer Survey Institutional Research College of the Redwoods November 2012.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
PCI – 2 point scale Important Not Important Sample or Sample or Sample or Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Response to 1 st PCI variable Response to 2 nd PCI variable.
Selection Sort
Student Profile Brooklyn College Office of Institutional Planning, Research, and Assessment 2010.
SATISFACTION AND SELF-PERCEPTIONS: HOW ARE THE RELATED? STEVE GRAUNKE INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Social Development and Happiness in nations Ruut Veenhoven Erasmus University Rotterdam Presentation at Conference Taking Stock: Measuring Social.
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
OMS Questionnaire Changes for Version 3
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Café Rosso: A Good Cup of Coffee By: Natalie McKaig Joe Farnham Melanie Chong Romina Mizani.
Viking Survey Results Report Team Assignment 11 Team 2-1.
Inform. Engage. Impact. 13th July 2012 Chocolate Co-creation: An inclusive approach Dr Hua Dong, Brunel University.
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Real Estate Agent Response Times versus Client Expectations Room for improvement is clearly indicated. Market Enhancement Group, Inc. MEG-Research.com.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Selection Sort Comparison Data Movement Sorted.
Selection Sort
Campus Climate: Embedded in Strategic Plan Core Theme Three: Building Community – Create a diverse, inclusive, and safe environment accessible to all Objective.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Florida’s five-year fishing promo and sustainable market strategies Bob Wattendorf and Scott Ball.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
MEMBER SURVEYS Chris Purdy Vice President, Member Solutions.
©NIDEA 1 Dr. Sheena Moosa 12 th IFA 2014 Conference, Hyderabad, June MBBS, MPH ROLE OF SOCIAL VALUES IN ENHANCING WELLBEING OF OLDER PEOPLE Affiliations:
Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.
1 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION PROCESS. After completion of every project, an goes from Head of Research & Analytics department to the project manager.
AAPA Research – 2318 Mill Road, Suite 1300, Alexandria VA, AAPA Member Satisfaction 2014 Results.
Pagosa Springs Area Tourism Consumer Satisfaction and Demographic Information Study Jenalle Beaman, Candace Corrales, and Kayla Wright.
Figure not at all somewhat mostly extremely Using the above scale, please rate your physician on the following characteristics assuming that.
Version 1 | Public (DELETE CLASSIFICATION) Version 1 | Internal Use Only Version 1 | Confidential Version 1 | Strictly Confidential© Ipsos MORI NHTS 2014.
Estimating a Population Proportion. p ,46,48,50 p ,52,54,56.
National Survey of Student Engagement Noel-Levitz Satisfaction Surveys
Impact of School Culture: Part-Time MBA Programs
Membership Satisfaction Survey
Marguerite B. McDonald, MD
Institutional Research and Planning
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
Spearman Rank Order Correlation Example
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Managing Motor Fleet Safety Programs: Training for the Safety Director
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
Afjal Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Marketing
What is pH?.
Excel Exam Review March 29,
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
UBT Project Prioritization Matrix
Hypothesis testing Example Questions.
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Institutional Research and Planning
½ of 6 = 3.
Student Experience Survey 2016 Preliminary Analysis
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
UBT Project Prioritization Matrix
C.2.10 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
Institutional Research and Planning
Consumer Behaviour Lecture 3.
Presentation transcript:

Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version) Institutional Research and Planning 1/18/2019

Undergraduate student sample 1/18/2019 20 % response rate

Undergraduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 1/18/2019

Undergraduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 1/18/2019

Undergraduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 1/18/2019

Undergraduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 1/18/2019

Undergraduate student satisfaction Sorted by importance and satisfaction Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance 1/18/2019

Overall undergraduate satisfaction with NJIT Five year comparison 1/18/2019 Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate correlates of satisfaction 1/18/2019

Question #24. If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT Question #24. If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate students 1/18/2019