AE 2350 Design Project David Eger Peter Pociask Pi - 42.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture X: Wind Factors
Advertisements

AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Low-Airframe-Noise Transport Aircraft 44 th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno January 9, 2006 Leifur.
The Largest Airliner in the World
Socata TBM 700 VS Piper Meridian
October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Airplane Flight: X-Plane in the Classroom Wing Loading Ratio of the plane’s weight (w) divided by the surface area of the wing (s)
AE 10 Airplane Design. Preliminary Aircraft Design Process 1. Mission Specification 2. Configuration Design 3. Weight Sizing 4. Performance Sizing 5.
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
Predicting Performance
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Aircraft Performance Charts Private Pilot Ground School
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Top 10 Combat Aircraft of world war ll Click f5. 10.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
The Boeing 777 can hold a max of 550 passengers on board and 2 crew members.
AIAA Hybrid Airliner Competition 2013 The Transporters.
October 19, 2015 Airbus A340 Family John Blizard February 3, 2009 Airbus A Airbus A Airbus A Airbus A
Mensa XE (Extra Efficiency) High Efficiency Family Airplane
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
The Private Pilot.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
Advanced Weight & Balance
ANTONOV AN-225 “THE WORLD’S BIGGEST PLANE” BY JENNY AND KATIE.
By: Ryan and Drew.  Armament (weapons): None  Engines: Two Pratt and Whitney J58’s (each weighing 6,000 lbs.)  Maximum Speed: Mach 3.2 (3.2 times the.
Flight Manual - Sections 5 & 6 Performance Charts and Weight & Balance
Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
비행체 구조설계 Aircraft Structural Design
Prabhath Dasanayake All rights reserved
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #10 May 14, 1999 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance Introduction to Aircraft Stability and Control.
SYSTEMS DEFINITION REVIEW Brian Acker Lance Henricks Matthew Kayser Kevin Lobo Robert Paladino Ruan Trouw Dennis Wilde.
CASE STUDY ON “AVIATION” BY VISHAL DESHPANDE VINAY AKKI SHABAZ BHAVIKATTI SHAHASAN NOUSHAD Slide 1.
Aircraft Design.
Ground School 3.06 Weight & Balance.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
How Planes and Other Aircrafts Fly
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
F-18 Hornet and F-18 Super Hornet
Phantom Eye Boeing UAV Brandon Witte.
Aircraft Performance
Conestoga Valley High School Aviation Technology
Airfoils and Simulation
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
A R C E R I A L O B O T I C S L U B AIRFRAME: Piccolo LT Autopilot
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
SER GA 157th Mighty 8th Aerospace Education Unit
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Principles of Flight Chapter 5 - Gliding.
Related Rates Chapter 5.5.
Airfoils and Simulation
Airfoils.
Charlie Rush Zheng Wang Brandon Wedde Greg Wilson
Airfoils and Simulation
Tables Toolbox.
Embraer ERJ 135 VIP PHOTOS SPECIFICATIONS AIRCRAFT SPECIFICATIONS
Presentation transcript:

AE 2350 Design Project David Eger Peter Pociask Pi - 42

Design Requirements Crew - 2 Engines - 2 Payload - 10,000 Lbs. 1500 Mile Radius with 45 min. reserve Top speed - Mach 2.0 @ 30,000 ft. Take off and landing over a 35 foot obstacle - 6000 Feet

Influences in the Design of the Pi -42 Design Influences Influences in the Design of the Pi -42

SU -27 General Planform

F-15 Similarity to design requirements

F-16 Bubble Cockpit

YF -23 Ruddervators

Mig -29 Upper Air Intakes

Design Estimates From Homework 5 Original Estimates: Engines: 2 x EJ200 Gross Weight: 40,000 lb Payload: 10,000 lb Wing Area: 320 sq. ft. Aspect Ratio: 3.2 Top Speed: Mach 2.3 Cruise Speed: ~Mach 1.0 SFC: .74-.81 (dry), 1.66-1.73 (wet) We thought that we would model our plane after the F-16, which was similar in weight and aspect ratio to our original estimates.

A Problem of Range However, our flying radius was a mere 750 knots. To increase our radius, we increased our weight to allow for more fuel. While playing with weight, however, we found ourselves swapping formulas in an odd way.

Landing Distance The landing distance was unable to be met without adversely effecting every other design parameter. Attempts: up Wing Area, up Aspect Ratio, decrease Sweep

Why Not Use a High Aspect Ratio? From a pure drag standpoint, having a high aspect ratio is good. The power needed to maintain cruise is minimal with a high aspect ratio; this is the reason why gliders use such narrow, long wings.

Why Not Use a High Aspect Ratio?

Solution to Landing Problem

Final Numbers Top Speed: Mach 2.0 Cruise Speed: ~Mach 0.8 Range: 3,500 Statute Miles Takeoff Distance: 3700 ft. Landing Distance (extrapolated from Fig 15.35): 7250 ft. Gross Weight: 45,000 lb Payload: 10,000 lb Wing Area: 560 sq. ft. Aspect Ratio: 3.5 Wing Span: 44 ft. Plane Length: 63 ft.

Some images of our aircraft. Pictures Some images of our aircraft.

Pi-42 TOP VIEW

Pi-42 SIDE & FRONT VIEWS

Pi-42 3D Model

Pi-42 over Red Square

Credits DON’T PANIC Macromedia Extreme 3d and 3D Studio Max Caffeine. Lots. Jane’s All the Worlds Aircraft. Douglas Adam’s comforting words: DON’T PANIC Special Thanks to Brian Dolan, Nick Ehret, and as always, our roommates for not killing us in our sleep.