Instrumenting the Balance Error Scoring System for Use With Patients Reporting Persistent Balance Problems After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Laurie A. King, PhD, PT, Fay B. Horak, PhD, PT, Martina Mancini, PhD, Donald Pierce, PhD, Kelsey C. Priest, BA, James Chesnutt, MD, Patrick Sullivan, MA, Julie C. Chapman, PsyD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 353-359 (February 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.015 Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Opal sensor placement at L5. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014 95, 353-359DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.015) Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Frequency distributions for the 4 indicated balance tests: BESS (a), modified BESS (b), instrumented BESS (c), and instrumented modified BESS (d). The rows of square symbols indicate mean values. The P values are for 2-sample t tests. Abbreviations: Instr., instrumented; Mod., modified. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014 95, 353-359DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.015) Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 ROC curves for the TPR and FPR for each balance test. Abbreviations: FPR, false positive rate; Inst., instrumented; Mod., modified; TPR, true positive rate. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014 95, 353-359DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.015) Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions