Kristin Booth Glen, University Professor, Dean Emerita, CUNY School of Law Project Director, SDMNY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From the Perspective of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry
Advertisements

Legal Capacity, Personhood and Supported Decision Making
Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
Restoring Voice to People
The Work of the Missouri Guardianship Statutory Reform Task Force.
HUMAN RIGHTS Right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health Heather Payne-Drakes.
GUARDIANSHIP IN UTAH Legal Terms and Procedures. HOW DO I KNOW IF MY FAMILY MEMBER NEEDS GUARDIANSHIP? These questions are directly from the Utah Protective.
Implications of UNCRPD for Service Providers, Government and NGOs A Presentation by Poonam Natarajan Chairperson, National Trust 15 April 2010 NIEPMD,
The Chaplain as Spiritual Guide in Ethics Consults 2006.
Guardianship Proceedings in North Carolina for Persons with Developmental Disabilities Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities UNC School of.
Supporting Citizenship – The Future of Services for Persons with Disabilities in Ireland: Some Reflections on the Impact of the UN Convention on the R.
Introduction More than one billion people in the world live with some form of disability, of whom nearly 200 million experience considerable difficulties.
SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING A PROJECT OF PARIVAAR VIJAY KANT COM, PARIVAAR.
VLAF - 19 July 2012 Eleanore Fritze Senior lawyer, Mental Health & Disability Advocacy, Civil Justice Overview of VLRC guardianship review: New principles.
A NEW ERA OF GUARDIANSHIP REFORM: SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING Bob Fleischner Center for Public Representation George Fleischner Nonotuck Resource Associates.
Mental Health Policy, Human Rights & the Law Mental Disability Advocacy Program Open Society Institute Camilla Parker October 2004.
ACE Project Conference – Tartu - Estonia June 2011 European Disability Policy : a right-based approach "Nothing about us without us”
CRPD: Community Support Rosemary Kayess. Policy Context International Standards Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities –Recognises disability.
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Development Cooperation Training course Brussels, 29 th & 30 th November 2012 Module 3: The CRPD as a key driver.
DECISION MAKING RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
Charlotte McClain-Nhlapo, Senior Operations Officer, Workshop on Innovation in Accessible Transport for All. 14 January 2010 Washington, DC.
Webinar on Disability Rights June 17, 2013 WCL Center on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Prof. Robert Dinerstein.
School of Law Reasonable Accommodation Education Lecturer: Shivaun Quinlivan
Implementing Rights of Person with Disabilities in Practice Liisa Murto Legal Adviser Kynnys ry.
Supported Decision-Making: International Context and Exploration of Outcomes of People Under Guardianship Valerie Bradley Elizabeth Pell Dorothy Hiersteiner.
GUARDIANSHIP AND SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING Bob Fleischner Center for Public Representation July 2015 Disability Rights Center July 2015.
Individualized Service Plan (ISP). Course Introduction 4 Modules: Defining the ISP Developing the ISP Simulated ISP Planning Writing the ISP 2.
The Policy Company Limited © Safeguarding – Part 1 - Policy.
Lecture number 12 Topic: Basic rights, freedoms and duties of man and citizens in the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Community Lawyering Lambreni Waddell, Neighborhood Legal Services
Great Expectations: Alternatives to Guardianship
PROJECT COLOMBIA Recognition of the Legal Capacity of Persons with Intellectual and psychosocial Disability through the documentation of good practices.
The importance of a paradigm shift in European mental health care
Finding the “Rights” Balance
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
Combating Guardianship and Conservatorship Abuse: Challenges and Successes Terry W. Hammond Terry W. Hammond Consulting (737)
Equal recognition before the law
Senior Executive Officer, Individual & Family Support
Maximizing Decision-making capabilities for the exercise of legal capacity Presentation to Conference on Disability and Legal Capacity under the CRPD Harvard.
The CRPD and guardianship reform in Central and Eastern Europe
Matthew Smith, Esq. Joan Cornachio Project Coordinator
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND JUSTICE ON THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ,BILL, 2017 [B10B-2017] 1 NOVEMBER 2017.
Supported Decision Making Evolution of an idea and Canadian experience Michael Bach Canadian Association for Community Living March 26,
Assisted Decision-Making
Guardianship, Substitute or Supported Decision Making?
Towards full participation of ageing persons with disabilities
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
Discrimination on the basis of disability
Annelisa COTONE European Commission DG Justice
Psychiatric Advance Directives
A short introduction to the Convention
Hon. Kristin Booth Glen Project Director Matthew Smith, Esq.
Massachusetts SDM Pilot
About the NCCDD Our Members Our Initiatives November 2017
Disability Rights and the United Nations: Developing Hard Law
Gem Complete Health Services
iImplementing the CRPD among service providers
The Peruvian legal capacity reform
Fundamental Rights and Responsibilities
Analysis of Peruvian Reform
Working on normative elements
Developing normative element: Autonomy and independence
The importance of a paradigm shift in European mental health care
Disclaimer Opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Virginia Department for Aging.
CURRENT AND EMERGING ISSUES IN GUARDIANSHIP
Obtaining Proof of Decision-Making Authority
Discrimination on the basis of disability
Dovilė Juodkaitė Inclusion Europe conference, Vilnius 6 June, 2019
Important to Keep in Mind…
Presentation transcript:

Kristin Booth Glen, University Professor, Dean Emerita, CUNY School of Law Project Director, SDMNY

“Protection” of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities 1900 to 1970, institutionalization in “schools” for the retarded 1964, Willowbrook 1966 to present, guardianship 1969, Article 17-A enacted 2017 and forward, supported decision- making?

Guardianship The legal process by which the right and power to make decisions and enter into legal relationships is taken away from one person because of his/her alleged incapacity, and given instead to another, the Guardian

What Is Supported Decision-Making? Supported decision-making (SDM) is “a series of relationships, practices, arrangements and agreements of more or less formality and intensity designed to assist an individual with a disability to make and communicate to others decisions about the individual’s life.” Robert Dinerstein (2012)

Supported Decision-Making can take many forms Completely informal (so often invisible) Circles of support Formalized through a facilitated process that may involve a written agreement/contract (SDMNY model) Legalized by statute

Where does SDM come from? Our common experience of how everyone makes decisions The human right of every person to make her/his own decisions regardless of disability

Kinds of Support Gathering necessary information Educating the person with I/DD, the Decision Maker (DM) about that information Identifying possibilities and alternatives Aiding the DM in weighing choices and understanding consequences Communicating the DM’s decision to others Helping to implement the DM’s decision

A Fundamental Principle of Human Rights:Dignity Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world… Universal Declaration of Human Rights, (UDHR), Preface (1948)

Dignity, cont’d UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), Art. 3 General Principles: (3) Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one’s own choices…

U.N.Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) Article 12 States Parties reaffirm that persons with disabilities have the right to recognition everywhere as persons before the law. States Parties shall recognize that persons with disabilities enjoy legal capacity on an equal basis with others in all aspects of life. States Parties shall take appropriate measures to provide access by persons with disabilities to the support they may require in exercising their legal capacity.

How is SDM being implemented around the world? Legislation to limit or abolish guardianship Pilot projects to demonstrate that SDM can empower and protect persons with I/DD

SDM Pilots Around the World

Why Use SDM? Persons with I/DD never lose important rights: e.g., to contract, to vote, to work, to marry SDM allows a person to take some risks and learn from “bad” choices SDM helps to form a network of supporters that can protect against exploitation Persons with I/DD have a human right to make their own decisions

Supported Decision-Making Facilitation Training January 18, 2017 Who Supports SDM? 2018 Wisconsin & Washington, DC pass legislation recognizing SDMAs 2017 American Bar Association adopts Resolution 113 Uniform Law Commission revises UGPPA U.S. Dept. Educ. OSERS issues guidance on transition 2016 AAIDD & The Arc issue Joint Position Statement Social Security Administration releases Issue Brief National Guardianship Association issues Position Statement Delaware passes legislation recognizing SDMAs 2015 Texas passes legislation recognizing SDMAs 2014 Administration for Community Living creates Supported Decision-Making Program SDMNY, made possible by funding from the NYS DDPC

SDMA Legislation around the United States WI: Law MA: Bill WA: Bill RI: Bill IN: Study DC: Law VA: Study DE: Law AK: Bill NC: Study TX: Law

Who We Are SDMNY is a collaboration among Hunter/CUNY, the New York Alliance for Innovation and Inclusion, the Arc of Westchester, and Disability Rights NY (DRNY) SDMNY is the recipient of a 5 year grant from the NYS Developmental Disability Planning Council (DDPC) to create an educational campaign about Supported decision-Making (SDM) and to develop pilot projects to demonstrate SDM as an alternative to guardianship

The SDMNY Diversion and Restoration Pilots Facilitating persons with I/DD (who we call “the Decision Maker”) to choose a person or persons with whom they have trusting relationships to support them in making decisions in specified domains (i.e. health, finances, education, residence, etc.) and to enter into a written document, the SDMA, that incorporates the terms of their agreement

Diversion and Restoration Pilots. Cont’d Diversion: Utilizing the facilitation process and SDMA to make guardianship unnecessary (less restrictive alternative Restoration: Utilizing the facilitation process and SDMA to persuade a court that guardianship is no longer needed or in the person’s “best interest”

Facilitation Pilots: The Cast of Characters The Person with I/DD (the Decision-Maker or DM) The Facilitator The mentor The Supporters

The SDMNY Facilitation Model Phase 1: Facilitator works with DM on areas in which support is desired, kinds of support, and identifying supporters Phase 2: Facilitator works with chosen supporters to educate about SDM and to “re-position” them from “best interests” and control, to support for autonomy and self determination Phase 3: Facilitator works with DM and supporters to negotiate the supported decision-making agreement (SDMA) Conclusion: SDMA signed, but remains open to modification by the DM as circumstances change

The SDMA Names the domains in which the DM will accept support; the supporter(s)for each domain; and the kinds of support to be given and accepted Signed by DM and supporters, who agree to support, not substitute, and to refrain from any conflict of interest and/or undue influence Tailored to each individual DM, utilizing a template created by SDMNY after review of all existing SDMAs and in consultation with stakeholders, including self-advocates

Supported Decision-Making Facilitation Training January 18, 2017 Purpose of the SDMA Serves as a goal/end product for the facilitation process and signals its success Formalizes parties’ agreement and provides a reference if misunderstandings occur Allows for flexibility as the DM’s decision-making skills and confidence increase Supporters “age out” or otherwise become unavailable the DM needs to make decisions in new areas  Demonstrates that there is a clear system in place that is a “less restrictive alternative” that avoids guardianship  Provides an evidentiary basis for passage of an SDM law in New York SDMNY, made possible by funding from the NYS DDPC

Legal Effect of SDMAs Third parties (health care professionals, bankers, etc.) may accept, but SDMAs are currently not legally binding on private third parties; mandatory acceptance (as with Powers of Attorney) would need legislation; such legislation currently in place in Texas, Delaware, Washington. D.C. and Wisconsin, but not in New York SDMNY is working on getting acceptance by OPWDD and DOE/schools (for the latter, there is precedent in D.C. and Nevada)

Supported Decision-Making Facilitation Training January 18, 2017 SDMNY, Today In New York City, we are currently facilitating 30 Decision-Makers towards making SDMAs with their Supporters Last year, we began facilitating Decision-Makers in Westchester County Later this year, we will begin facilitating Decision- Makers in the Rochester and Capital areas An SDMNY decision-maker at the United Nations in June 2017 SDMNY, made possible by funding from the NYS DDPC

For more information about SDMNY, please visit www.sdmny.org