Stage 2: Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 May 29, 2012.
Advertisements

Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Evaluation Overview - Basics. Purpose of Testing Diagnostic Formative Summative.
Backward Design Stages Identify Student Learning Expectations/ Targets Determine acceptable Evidence of student learning. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction.
Session 3 The evidence should be credible & helpful. Implications: the assessments should – ◦ Be grounded in real-world applications, supplemented as.
Patchogue- Medford UbD Curriculum Group Understanding by Design Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe What is backward design?
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
An approach to curriculum designed to engage students in inquiry and uncovering ideas.
Developing a Rubric for the Design of Learning Spaces: Starting Points
1 Maria Teresa de la Torre Aranda. Goal: Provide participants with an overall understanding of the three stages of backward design by exploring how setting.
Introduction to UbD Stages 1
Dr. Robert Mayes University of Wyoming Science and Mathematics Teaching Center
Unit 15 Assessment in Language Teaching. Teaching objectives By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:  know what assessment is and how it.
Redding Elementary School Integrated Learning Experiences Summer 2011 Presentation created by Christopher Wermuth 2011.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
46th Annual MPESA Fall Conference
Good Teaching Follows a Cycle Created by Dawn Cardenas, The Reading Whisperer™
Parkway School District Day 2 Evidence of Understanding And Teaching for Understanding Understanding by Design THINK DIALOGUE COLLABORATE TEACH Authentic.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
MI/MIS PDU April 2013 Agenda: 4:30-5:00 Deep Dive in LEAP Indicator I.8 5:00-5:15, Networking, Feedback on AT and Special Olympics 5:30 – 6:30 Stage 2.
 Understanding by Design Using Backwards Design Principles to Create Standards-Based Units Welcome! We’re glad you’re here…
Understanding by Design Stage 2: Evidence Think Like an Assessor.
Adapted from Understanding by Design Academy, Seattle, WA, July 2001 presented by Jay McTighe, ASCD. Think “Scrapbook” versus “Snapshot ”
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Lesson Planning in Backwards Planning DO NOW 1) Divide into two groups.  One group will make a list of answers to this question: What inspires student.
High School Department Development Day February 12, 2010.
Understanding By Design
Stage 2 Understanding by Design Assessment Evidence.
Understanding by Design, UbD - based on work by McTighe and Wiggins.
National 5 Biology Assignment
Youth Development Evaluation Orientation. NC 4-H E-LC 2016 People.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
UNDERSTANDING BY DESIGN
Understanding by Design grant wiggins & jay mctighe
UbD - Stage 2 Assessment Evidence. Our Big Idea Making Best Practices, Common Practice *create a variety of assessments, to be used throughout the lesson,
Chapter 7- Thinking Like an Assessor Amy Broadbent and Mary Beck EDU 5103.
Lenape School District Understanding by Design Day 2 June 26, 2012 Day 2 June 26, 2012.
Assessment for Learning Evaluate Learning Styles Using Formative and Summative Assessments.
Designing curriculum for “understanding” with the case of upcoming 2015 revised national curriculum in Korea Presenter : J.D. Ohn.
Approaching Assessment
Evidence of Understanding
FACULTY OF PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICINE
Starting with the End in Sight…
Understanding by Design
Stage 2: Assessment.
Understanding by Design
Creating an Active Learning environment
Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
Teaching with Documents:
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding By Design Introduction September 17th , 2009
Understanding by Design
Student Assessment and Evaluation
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
Understanding By Design
Talking about Evaluation,
What are the “Facets of Understanding”
An ideal assessment programme
Mapping the Assessment and Evaluation in a Unit
Assessment of Classroom Learning
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
The 7Es Model of Instruction
Patchogue-Medford UbD Curriculum Group
Student Assessment and Evaluation
How to structure 01 A Level Stuarts answers
NET History Exam Skills
This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series
How to structure 01 A Level Stuarts answers
Presentation transcript:

Stage 2: Assessment

Thinking Like an Assessor Making assessment Stage 2 is the most unnatural part of UbD The “natural” thing to do is to move from target to teaching For most of us, it is unnatural to resist the urge to go immediately to activities

Why Is Assessment So Important? It helps us and our students see how the teaching and learning is going Assessment should be ongoing and formative as well as summative

How do we assess for understanding? We use the six facets of understanding as a guide

A student who really understands can… Explain Interpret Apply Show perspective Demonstrate empathy Reveal self-knowledge

Design Filters for Assessment Valid Reliable Sufficient Authentic Feasible Student-friendly

Two Key Questions Could the student perform well on this assessment and still not really have deep understanding? (false+) Could the student perform poorly on this assessment despite having deep understanding?(false -)

Baseball Example We wish to assess the batting ability of a baseball player We choose for our assessment to observe their performance at the first at-bat of the season

Apply the Design Filters Valid Reliable Sufficient Authentic Feasible Student-friendly

Summary Evaluation This assessment is a valid test of batting ability but it is not reliable, nor does it provide sufficient evidence. It is authentic, feasible, and friendly. Overall, however, it is not a good assessment of what we are trying to measure.