Design your e-infrastructure. egi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI AAI in EGI Status and Evolution Peter Solagna Senior Operations Manager
Advertisements

Gu & Maher University of Sydney, September 2004 DECO2005 Co-Authoring and Changes Management in ArchiCAD Teamwork.
The CrossGrid project Juha Alatalo Timo Koivusalo.
Oxford Jan 2005 RAL Computing 1 RAL Computing Implementing the computing model: SAM and the Grid Nick West.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse 2.
DIRAC Web User Interface A.Casajus (Universitat de Barcelona) M.Sapunov (CPPM Marseille) On behalf of the LHCb DIRAC Team.
Learning Are you ready to……. Evolvonline™ Learning.Successwww.evolvonline.com Bob Chappell.
AARC Overview Licia Florio, David Groep 21 Jan 2015 presented by David Groep, Nikhef.
Grid Workload Management & Condor Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks ?? Athens, May 5-6th 2009 Community Support.
AAI WG EMI Christoph Witzig on behalf of EMI AAI WG.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Owen SyngeTitle of TalkSlide 1 Storage Management Owen Synge – Developer, Packager, and first line support to System Administrators. Talks Scope –GridPP.
JRA1.4 Models for implementing Attribute Providers and Token Translation Services Andrea Biancini.
EPOS IP Roadmap Massimo Cocco & PDB. EPOS IP project Timeline Implementation Validation Pre-operation.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Robin McConnell NA3 Activity Manager 02.
Cracow Grid Workshop, October 15-17, 2007 Polish Grid Polish NGI Contribution to EGI Resource Provisioning Function Automatized Direct Communication Tomasz.
EGI-InSPIRE RI EGI-InSPIRE EGI-InSPIRE RI Evolution of AAI for e- infrastructures Peter Solagna Senior Operations Manager.
EMI Inter-component and Large Scale Testing Infrastructure Danilo Dongiovanni INFN-CNAF.
Breaking the frontiers of the Grid R. Graciani EGI TF 2012.
EGI-Engage EGI Webinar - Introduction - Gergely Sipos EGI.eu / MTA SZTAKI 6/26/
Authentication and Authorisation for Research and Collaboration Taipei - Taiwan Mechanisms of Interfederation 13th March 2016 Alessandra.
Genie Pal A Versatile Intelligent Assistant To Help Both Work And Personal life.
ELIXIR AAI Michal Procházka, Mikael Linden, EGI VC 15 March 2016.
Frascati, 2-3 July 2008 Slide 1 User Management compliance testing for G-POD HMA-T Phase 2 KO Meeting 2-3 July 2008, Frascati Andrew Woolf, STFC Rutherford.
Software Reuse. Objectives l To explain the benefits of software reuse and some reuse problems l To discuss several different ways to implement software.
PaaS services for Computing and Storage
Raising awareness on the ramifications of Digital Divide
Break out group coordinator:
Interset Support Overview March 2017
Project Facts Partners: DANTE (UK), GARR (IT), RedCLARA (UY), RedIRIS (ES), RENATA (CO), RNP (BR), TERENA (NL) Coordinator: RedCLARA Project Duration:
Match – Audit - Append Takes monetizing your data assets to a new level.
Break out group coordinator:
IaaS Layer – Solutions for “Enablers”
EO Applications Parallel Session
Exploitation and Sustainability updates
Design your e-infrastructure. egi
Defining and tracking requirements for New Communities
EGI use case description and development planning template Use case(s): Provider: …
EPAM Cloud Orchestration
WP1 activity, achievements and plans
NA3: User Community Support Team
Antonella Fresa Technical Coordinator
Action U-E-5 Technical Coordination – User Technical Support
Interoperability & Standards
Connecting the European Grid Infrastructure to Research Communities
Design your e-infrastructure. egi
Thursday pilot session: 7-minutes
Case Study: Algae Bloom in a Water Reservoir
EGI Webinar - Introduction -
WP5.2 Report & outlook Jan Bot, SURF
Benefits and vision for the VRC community model
Module 01 ETICS Overview ETICS Online Tutorials
Design your e-infrastructure. egi
Break out group coordinator:
Break out group coordinator:
Future EU Grid Projects
e-Infrastructure commons Updates
Design your e-infrastructure!
EGI FedCloud User Support coordination meeting
Technical Outreach Expert
UmbrellaID in the EOSC era ?
Ready, Set, Goal! The Key to Practice Success
e-Infrastructure commons Updates
WP6 – EOSC integration J-F. Perrin (ILL) 15th Jan 2019
NEW STEPS IN THE PROJECT GIS NATURA 2000
EOSC-hub Contribution to the EOSC WGs
OU BATTLECARD: Oracle WebCenter Training
Presentation transcript:

Design your e-infrastructure. https://indico. egi Design your e-infrastructure! https://indico.egi.eu/indico/event/2895/ Use case: Birdhouse Break out group coordinator: Jan Bot and Roberta Piscitelli SURF SARA – EGI.eu

Group members Jan Bot (SURF SARA) Genevieve Romier (CNRS) Romain David (IMBE) Teresa-Gomez Diaz (CNRS) Catalin Couderoche (STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory) Carsten Ehbrecht (DKRZ) Roberta Piscitelli (EGI.eu)

First break-out Background and Users

Who will be the user? Can the users be characterised? How many are they? Two kinds of groups: Data providers Users Not really aware of the system Users who need to implement the service itself People familiar with data processing The amount depends on the use case provided, ranging from 10-20 in case of data providers to 50-100

What will be the value of the infrastructure for them What will be the value of the infrastructure for them? What will the system exactly deliver to them? 1) Value of the infrastructure for users For users who use quality services it would be a convenience For ordinary users data access is a problem, so the value is in accessing to data to process it. In case of WPS they provide processes, which are community specific it would be the combination of having data accessible and operate on it. The benefit is providing this type of integration 2) The system will deliver mainly Connecting processing services to data In other use cases it will provide data to a broader community

How should they use the system? Normal users will use a portal The WPS provides the services The applications offered to the advanced users are exactly the same The value of EGI would be to implement the entire system EGI could help with dissemination

There is already a system available as prototype What's the timeline for development, testing and large-scale operation? (Consecutive releases can/should be considered.) There is already a system available as prototype For metadata checks it should be ready by the end of the year For Copernicus it should start in the summer and it should last 3 years for development The timeline is strongly dependent on the project, according to the features requested (from hours to years)

Design and implementation plan Second break-out Design and implementation plan

What should the first version include What should the first version include? - The most basic product prototype imaginable already bringing value to the users (the so-called Minimal Viable Product - MVP) The first version would include portal and WPS system, with access limited to the portal and not directly to the WPS

Which components/services already exist in this architecture? WPS itself Access to storage Portal Terminal client to access to interact directly to the WPS Missing: Proxy for authentication system, which talks to the different AAI systems and knows the WPS protocol The scheduling system to access to computing resources needs to be integrated

Which components/services are under development (and by who)? Proxy for authentication system, which talks to the different AAI systems and knows the WPS protocol Implemented by DKRZ and KNMI The scheduling system to access to computing resources needs to be integrated Implemented by DKRZ, BADC for Copernicus use case (same service implemented by different entities, and will use different plug-ins)

Proxy to handle different AAI Which components/services should be still brought into the system? Can EGI/EUDAT partners do it? Proxy to handle different AAI EGI/EUDAT provide this service Docker system to connect to different schedulers EGI/EUDAT do provide dockers, however they do not enable users to use dockers to implement this functionality Schedulers could also be brought by EGI, but there are some technical issues to do this

IdP Proxy can handle different AAI systems Are there gaps in the EGI/EUDAT service catalogues that should be filled to realise the use case? Which service provider could fill the gap? DIRAC could be a good abstraction layer to submit jobs and schedule them in different sites IdP Proxy can handle different AAI systems EGI would redirect to the right NGI to provide resources to your community To validate the docker solution, it would be possible to request EGI some resources to test this solution, this would provide you with the required knowledge to run it.

Next steps DIRAC for job and Docker container scheduling; Organise a DIRAC training webinar, covering relevant features EGI AAI proxy for user access Connect use case provider with EGI AAI proxy team to arrange application of this service for the use case