Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Advertisements

Sampath Koppole, Jeremy C. Smith, Stefan Fischer  Structure 
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Recent Cyanobacterial Kai Protein Structures Suggest a Rotary Clock
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Multiple Conformations of F-actin
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
An open and closed case for all polymerases
Katharina Hipp, Clemens Grimm, Holger Jeske, Bettina Böttcher 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
The Atomistic Mechanism of Conformational Transition in Adenylate Kinase: A TEE-REX Molecular Dynamics Study  Marcus B. Kubitzki, Bert L. de Groot  Structure 
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Structural Role of the Vps4-Vta1 Interface in ESCRT-III Recycling
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Rotary Motor F0 under External Electric Fields across the Membrane  Yang-Shan Lin, Jung-Hsin Lin, Chien-Cheng Chang 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Similarity Analysis Uncovers Heterogeneous Structure-Activity Relationships and Variable Activity Landscapes  Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Wenzhe Ma, Chao Tang, Luhua Lai  Biophysical Journal 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Comparison of F1-ATPase: Interplay among Enzyme Structures, Catalysis, and Rotations  Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure  Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 588-598 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Global Conformations of αβ-Subunits Analyzed by PCA (A) The 87 superimposed αβ-subunit structures. The α- and β-subunits are represented in blue and red, respectively. They are viewed from inside the ring. (B) The eigenvalue contribution of the first 10 modes from PCA. (C) The eigenvectors of PC1 and PC2 are drawn on the average structure of αβs. The PC1 mode represents hinge-opening motion of β, whereas the PC2 is the loose/tight motion at the αβ-interface. (D) Two dimensional mapping of αβ-structures. x and y axes represent the first and second principal components, respectively. Colors represent bound nucleotides; ATP, ADPPi, ADP, Pi, and Empty are represented by cyan, magenta, blue, green, and red, respectively. Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Catalytic Site Conformations Analyzed by PCA (A) The 11 nucleotide-binding site residues identified were marked by different colors on the 1bmfDP structure. (Left) Side view from the outside. (Right) Close-up view where ADP is represented by sticks and colored by atomic types. (B) The superimposed structures of the nucleotide-binding site. Each color represents one residue. (C) Eigenvectors of local PC1, PC2, and PC3 were drawn on the structure of 1bmfE. The square root of eigenvalue of the local PC1 were multiplied to the normalized eigenvectors of the local PC1, PC2, and PC3. (D) Mapping of local structures on the two-dimensional surface of the local PC1 and PC2. (E) Mapping of local structures on the surface of the local PC1 and PC3. The color code in (D) and (E) is the same as that in Figure 1D. Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structures of the Phosphate Binding Sites Four different types of phosphate binding. Phosphates are shown in van der Waals representation. The phosphate binding residues identified are represented by sticks and colored by their types. (A) 1e1qE; type (1). (B) 3fks_2DP; type (1) + (2). (C) 2hld_2E; type (1) + (2) + (3). (D) 3fks_2E; type (2) + (3). Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rotary Angle and PCA of γ (A) The fitted ring structures of all F1-complexes to calculate rotary and tilting angles of γ-subunit. (B) Calculated rotary angles of γ are shown for all F1 complexes. (C) All γ structures after fitting of the ring structures are shown. Residues 1–30 (1–30) and 221–270 (226–275) used for PCA are shown in green, and the others are shown in blue. (D) Eigenvectors of first three modes of γ PCA are shown. Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Correlation between αβ Structures and the Orientations of γ (A) Correlation between the PC2 of αβE and the rotary angle of γ. Correlation coefficient was −0.893. (B) Correlation between the PC1 of αβDP and the rotary angle of γ. Correlation coefficient was −0.872. (C) Correlation between the PC2 of αβDP and the tilting angle of γ. Correlation coefficient was −0.688. Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Calculation of Helix 6 Angles (A) Domain partitions; fixed domain (blue), moving domain (red), and bending residues (green), and a rotation axis by DynDom are shown. The colored structure is βDP, whereas the gray structure is βHC. (B) The gray structure represents the original βHC structure, whereas the red structure represents a model structure that opens the C-terminal domain of βDP by using information from DynDom. (C) Definition of the helix6 angle of β-subunits. Three red arrows represent helix6 vectors of three β-subunits, whereas three black arrows represent three positional vectors of β. The helix6 angle is defined as an angle between the red and black arrow of the same β. (D) Calculated helix 6 angles of all 29 available F1-complexes. Structure 2011 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.013) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions