Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
A Conserved Oligomerization Domain in Drosophila Bazooka/PAR-3 Is Important for Apical Localization and Epithelial Polarity  Richard Benton, Daniel St.
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Drosophila Melted Modulates FOXO and TOR Activity
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Drosophila PAR-1 and Inhibit Bazooka/PAR-3 to Establish Complementary Cortical Domains in Polarized Cells  Richard Benton, Daniel St Johnston 
Lorri R. Marek, Jonathan C. Kagan  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 18, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
The Arl4 Family of Small G Proteins Can Recruit the Cytohesin Arf6 Exchange Factors to the Plasma Membrane  Irmgard Hofmann, Amanda Thompson, Christopher M.
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Patronin/Shot Cortical Foci Assemble the Noncentrosomal Microtubule Array that Specifies the Drosophila Anterior-Posterior Axis  Dmitry Nashchekin, Artur Ribeiro.
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Bryan W. Heck, Danelle Devenport  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (June 2006)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (July 2011)
Vitaly Zimyanin, Nick Lowe, Daniel St Johnston  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Axel Dienemann, Frank Sprenger  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Volume 20, Issue 20, Pages (October 2010)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Regulation of MBK-2/Dyrk Kinase by Dynamic Cortical Anchoring during the Oocyte-to- Zygote Transition  Michael L. Stitzel, Ken Chih-Chien Cheng, Geraldine.
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
Drosophila oogenesis Current Biology
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Sarah E. Siegrist, Chris Q. Doe  Cell 
PP2A Antagonizes Phosphorylation of Bazooka by PAR-1 to Control Apical-Basal Polarity in Dividing Embryonic Neuroblasts  Michael P. Krahn, Diane Egger-Adam,
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Novel Functions for Integrins in Epithelial Morphogenesis
Stabilization of Cell Polarity by the C. elegans RING Protein PAR-2
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Markus Kaspar, Axel Dienemann, Christine Schulze, Frank Sprenger 
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 636-642 (April 2010) Membrane Targeting of Bazooka/PAR-3 Is Mediated by Direct Binding to Phosphoinositide Lipids  Michael P. Krahn, Dieter R. Klopfenstein, Nannette Fischer, Andreas Wodarz  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 636-642 (April 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.065 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure-Function Analysis of Baz (A) Structure of the Bazooka (Baz) protein. The positions of identified point mutations in three baz alleles are indicated by arrowheads. Known phosphorylation sites of Baz are indicated by asterisks. (B) Schematic representation of deletion mutants of Baz. All versions of Baz were N-terminally tagged with GFP and expressed under the control of the UAS-GAL4 system in transgenic flies and tissue culture cells. The amino acid residues still present in the deletion mutants are given in numbers at the borders of the deletions. Rescue of the lethality of the strong baz815-8 allele by the respective GFP-Baz fusion proteins expressed with the UAS-GAL4 system under control of the da::GAL4 driver line is indicated by a “+” to the right of the schematic drawing of the construct. ND indicates not determined. For a summary of the subcellular localization of these Baz variants, see Table S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 636-642DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.065) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Subcellular Localization of Full-Length GFP-Baz (A) In the embryonic epidermis at stage 12, GFP-Baz colocalizes with DE-cadherin (DE-Cad) at the zonula adherens (ZA) but does not overlap with basolateral Discs large (Dlg). (B) In the follicular epithelium at stage 10 of oogenesis, GFP-Baz also colocalizes with DE-cadherin and is excluded from the basolateral membrane. (C) In embryonic metaphase neuroblasts (arrow), GFP-Baz colocalizes with aPKC in an apical cortical crescent opposite to the basal crescent of Miranda (Mira). (D) In stage 10 oocytes, GFP-Baz localizes to the cortex but is excluded from the posterior tip of the oocyte, marked by the presence of Staufen (Stau). The anterior-dorsal region of the oocyte is marked by the Gurken (Grk) protein. The following abbreviations are used: oc, oocyte; nc, nurse cell. DNA was stained with DAPI. Scale bars represent 10 μm. In (A)–(C), apical is up. In (D), anterior is to the left. For immunolocalization data of additional Baz variants, see Figure S1. Current Biology 2010 20, 636-642DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.065) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The C-Terminal Region of Baz Is Necessary and Sufficient for Membrane Localization (A, D, and G) GFP-BazΔ1097–1464 lacking 368 aa of the C-terminal region of Baz shows strongly reduced membrane localization and accumulates in the cytoplasm in the epidermis (A), in the follicular epithelium (D), and in neuroblasts (G, arrow). (B, E, and H) GFP-BazΔ1–904 lacking CR1 and all PDZ domains localizes to the membrane but does not accumulate apically in the epidermis (B), in the follicular epithelium (E), and in mitotic neuroblasts (H, arrow). (C, F, and I) Replacement of the C-terminal 357 aa of Baz by the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of phospholipase C δ, which binds to PI(4,5)P2, leads to normal localization of the GFP-BazΔ1107–1464PHP fusion protein in the epidermis (C) and in mitotic neuroblasts (I, arrow). In the follicular epithelium (F), the localization of GFP-BazΔ1107–1464PHP is not restricted to the ZA but spreads along the apical and lateral membrane. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Apical is up in all panels. For additional data related to this figure, see Figure S2. Current Biology 2010 20, 636-642DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.065) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The aa 947-1221 Region of Baz Binds to Phosphoinositides (A) Schematic drawings of the GST fusion proteins used for lipid-binding studies. (B) Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of purified GST fusion proteins used for the lipid-binding assays. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. (C) Lipid membrane strips were incubated with the GST fusion proteins indicated at the bottom, and bound proteins were detected with anti-GST antibody. (D) Relative binding efficiency of GST-Baz947–1464 to liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine (PC) plus 10 mol% of desired lipid. Binding to PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes in the presence and absence of 10 mol% phosphatidylserine (PS) was tested for stimulatory effect of PS [PI(3,4,5)P3 + PS]. For abbreviations of other lipids, see (C). GST fusion proteins of the PH domains of PLCδ1 [specific for PI(4,5)P2] and GRP1 [specific for PI(3,4,5)P3] were used as positive controls. Error bars indicate standard deviation of n = 3–5 independent experiments. (E) GST-Baz947–1464 binding to PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes in the range from 0 to 10 mol% PI(3,4,5)P3 (•) or PI(3)P + PI(4,5)P2 (○) to compare the effect of surface charge on binding. Note that GST-Baz947–1464 has a lower affinity for PI(3)P + PI(4,5)P2 than for PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes (compare 10 mol% and [D]). Error bars indicate standard deviation of n = 3 independent experiments. (F) Determination of KD values for binding of GST-Steppke-PH and GST-Baz947–1464 to PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes. Left: Coomassie-stained gel of GST-Steppke-PH and GST-Baz947–1464 liposome-bound (t lanes; top of sucrose gradient) and unbound (b lanes; bottom of sucrose gradient) fractions. The protein concentration used for the binding assays is given above the respective lanes. Right: quantification of GST-Steppke-PH (•) and GST-Baz947–1464 binding (○) to PI(3,4,5)P3 liposomes. The KD values determined by this method are 1.45 ± 0.30 μM for GST-Steppke-PH (solid line represents the nonlinear fit to the data points) and 3.50 ± 0.25 μM for GST-Baz947–1464 (dashed line represents the nonlinear fit to the data points). For additional data related to this figure, see Figure S3. Current Biology 2010 20, 636-642DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.065) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions