Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Table 4. Mechanical properties of repair and substrate concrete

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Fusion temperature range Clinical Applications

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Tensile strength (MPa) Length (m) of fibers/kg

Table 2. Physical properties of Portland cement

Tensile Strength (MPa)

Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

Figure 1. A: T1-weighted MRI shows enhanced lesion with peripheral edema on left frontal area, compatible with high grade glioma. B: Left frontal area.

Tensile Test after Firing

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

Group Male Female Total Astrocytoma Grade 2 (%65)13 (%35)7 (%100)20

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Equation Tem. (°C) Specific heat Thermal conductivity

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Presentation transcript:

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Tensile Strength) Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value Pink Between Groups 0.297 3 0.099 482.626 0.000* Within Groups 0.003 16 0.001 Total 0.300 19 Clear 4.505 1.502 5177.977 0.005 4.510 * Significant difference existed at 5% level. Amer A. Taqa et al. The Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on Some Properties of Acrylic Resin Denture Base Materials. American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 4, 62-65. doi:10.12691/ajmsm-1-4-3 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.