Luminometer Integration at IR2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb CERN SL/AP n Layout n Crossing Scheme n Luminosity n Collision.
Advertisements

Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
The LHCf experiment Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Letter Of Intent: May 2004 Technical report: September 2005.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
CESR Beam-Beam Effects at CESR Mark A. Palmer Cornell University July 14, 2001.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
The LHCf experiment Measurement of Photons and Neutral Pions in the Very Forward Region of LHC Letter Of Intent: May 2004 Technical report: September 2005.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
H. Matis, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+ several students including S. Hedges] (LBNL) E. Bravin (CERN), R. Miyamoto (BNL – now at ESSS) H. Matis -
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
PHENIX Run-13 status Hubert van Hecke for the PHENIX collaboration 1Hubert van Hecke - 05 Mar 13.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
COGGING MEETING Cogging Semi-Fine Adjust without collisions? Fine Adjust When? Cogging Meeting – Sophie BARON.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
1 BNL LARP Accelerator Physics Program Resources BNL role in national program BNL Accelerator Physics Program.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) Enrico Bravin AB/BDI Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL.
PPAC in ZDC for Trigger and Luminosity Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa Luminosity Workshop November 5, 2004.
BRANs Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM) LHC BI 2015 summary
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
Gas detectors in a ZDC (at LHC) Edwin Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For7 th CMS Heavy-Ion meeting at Delphi June 2003.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Plan for 500 GeV Development Vadim, Mei. Goals 1.Explore polarization transmission to the 500 Gev CM energy. 2. Inspect the luminosity aspects (with 2.
BRAN at IR2 and IR8: status, commissioning and operation Enrico Bravin AB-BI Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors 25 January.
Integration of forward physics detectors into the LSS of the LHC D. Macina (TS/LEA) Technical Support 2004 Workshop.
PPAC Jonathan Olson University of Iowa HCAL November 11-13, 2004.
LARP Mtg Oct 2004 page 1 John Byrd Status of the luminosity monitor 20 Oct, 2004 John Byrd.
LHCf: Integration and compatibility with the luminosity monitor
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
A.Smirnov, A.Sidorin, D.Krestnikov
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Limits on damping times
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view)
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Thursday Fill 1364 (24 bunch) dumped at 07h
From commissioning to full performance…
T. Laštovička / M. Ferro-Luzzi
LHC LUMINOSITY (RATE) MONITORS
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Luminometer Integration at IR2 3 October 2003 Enrico Bravin AB-BDI 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

LHC LUMINOSITY (RATE) MONITORS LBNL is responsible for the design and production of the TAS and TAN absorbers for IP1 and IP5. Bill Turner of LBNL has proposed to put some kind of instrumentation in these absorbers in order to measure the luminosity (or better the relative interaction rate.) After a number of iterations the decision was to instrument only the TAN's in IP1 and IP5, but also to install the same kind of monitors in IP2 and IP8. Two kind of technologies are under study for the detectors Ionization Chamber (most probable choice) CdTe solid state detectors In IP2 and IP8 there are no TAN's and an absorber must be put in front of the detectors in order to generate the showers (3cm of Cu for CdTe and 30cm of Cu for the IC) 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Monitors specifications A specification document has been prepared for the luminosity monitors of LHC “Measurement of the relative luminosity at the LHC” LHC-B-ES-0007 R. Assmann, J.P. Koutchouk, M. Placidi, E. Tsesmelis ... Standardized, simple, fast and robust machine luminometers are provided to set up the machine for physics, optimize its performance and compare it from run to run. The luminosity may be calibrated by comparing with the luminosity from the experiments and by the van der Meer method (cross-check of instruments, e.g. profile monitors). From experience, cross-checks with data from LHC detectors are equally valuable to understand possible differences in the luminosities of LHC IR’s. ... 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminosity modes at IR2 Bunch population Number of bunches Bunch spacing Mode IP beta Luminosity [cm-2 s-1] Collision studies with single pilot bunch, no crossing angle 5x109 1 p-p 10 m 3.61026 Collision studies with single high intensity bunch 1.11011 1.81029 Nominal p-p luminosity run 2808 25 ns 1.01030 Ion runs 7107 Pb-Pb 0.5 m 0.91024 592 0.51027 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Machine conditions AT IR2 IP beta Crossing angle plane Half total crossing angle Range for nominal cases 10 m Vertical ±150 mrad ±(35-150) mrad 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI Anticipated Use Initial beam finding &overlap maximization Manual Luminosity Maximization for physics runs Automated beam overlap feedback Equalization of the luminosity amongst the experiments Adjustment of the luminosity for ALICE (p-p) Minimization of beam excitation Monitoring of the crossing angle Bunch by bunch measurement of the luminosity 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI Accuarcies and rates Luminosity sub-range particle Resolution integration time Beam structure Luminosity 1.0  1026 1.0  1028 p-p beam  10% ~ 1 mn 1.0  1028 3.0  1034  1% (0.25%) ~ 1 s 1.0  1033 3.0  1034 bunch ~  1% ~ 10s 1.0  1024 5.0  1025 Pb-Pb 5.0  1025 0.5  1027 bunch ? 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Sensitivity to vertex parameters The relative calibration deals with possible variations of the proportionality factor between monitor signal and actual luminosity. This variation should be less than or equal to the resolution requested for the range of vertex parameters. For a constant crossing angle between the two beams, the trajectory of each beam may change due to machine tuning. We require the luminometer not to be sensitive to such changes within 15 mrad of the average beam direction for constant crossing angle. Transverse tolerance (x,y)  3 mm Longitudinal tolerance (s)  10 cm (  20 cm to 1m?) Tolerance on half-crossing direction   15 rad 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI Data transfer rates Data transfer Rate Luminosity for optimization (initial running and later) 1 Hz Luminosity for optimization (low beam intensity) 1/mn Background for optimization 1Hz Maximum logging rate of luminosity and background 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Possible technologies Two technologies are under investigation at the moment. A major constraint on the choice is given by the required radiation hardness necessary to survive in IR1 and IR5 Fast Ionization Chamber (rad hard) Polychristalline Cadmium Telluride detectors (rad hard but not enough) 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI Ionization Chamber The ionization chamber requires ~30cm of Cu in front of it to act as a converter and start the shower 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI

Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI The CdTe detector Due to the better sensitivity the CdTe detector does not need to sit at the shower maximum, a few cm of copper would be sufficient. 36.5 3 Oct 2003 Luminometer Integration at IR2 E. Bravin AB-BDI