THE DESIGN ARGUMEN T DESIGN ARGUMENT IGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGUMEN DESIGN ARGUMENT IGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGU DESIGN ARG DESIGN AR DESIGN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suffering & Belief Part two. The beauty of the creation… Is it the work of the creator or not?
Advertisements

Theory vs. Law.
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
Anthropic Design Arguments and the Anthropic Principle
The Big Bang Theory. Time begins The universe begins ~13.7 Billion years ago The universe begins as the size of a single atom The universe began as a.
Kevin Michael Vandergriff Opening Statement. Generic NaturalismSupernaturalism Theism Christian Theism Degree of Modesty + Degree of Coherence = Degree.
Swinburne’s argument from design
Does God Exist? The Cosmological Argument Goldsmith & McAtee The Design Argument Dana & Betsy Harris God & the Meaning of Life Hedges & Homoya Science.
The argument from design: Paley v. Hume Michael Lacewing
Place of Worship What do we mean by ‘place?’ In our hearts? In our lives? Planet earth? In the Universe? On a map? A particular building? A particular.
The Teleological Proof (II) The “Fine-Tuning” Argument 1.) The physical universe has been “fine-tuned” so that it may produce and sustain life. (Premise)
Is there a rational basis for the belief in God..
The Cosmological Argument St. Thomas Aquinas ( AD) Italian priest, philosopher.
Daniel Kahneman wins 2002 Nobel Prize for economics.
Design Arguments. Arguments for theism Ontological arguments Cosmological arguments Design arguments.
The Existence of God Daniel von Wachter. Issues involved How does “God” refer? What is God supposed to be like? What makes theistic belief rational? (basic.
Philosophy of Religion Michael Lacewing
Challenges of Big Bang Theory to Religious Belief & Responses to those Challenges!
Chapter 30 Section 4 Handout
The Evidence Explained. Learning Intentions: By the end of the lesson you will be able to… 1.Explain in detail at least two piece of evidence to support.
Unit 1 Introduction to Chemistry World of Chemistry Chapter 1 Chemistry: An Introduction.
Origin of the Universe Big Bang Theory.
Learning to Think Critically
Descartes I am essentially rational, only accidentally an animal ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily ‘essentially’ = logically necessarily Strictly speaking,
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
Natural Science 120 Prof. Andrew Reynolds CC219. Where are we in the universe?
Recent versions of the Design Argument. Describe the teleological argument for the existence of God. 4KU An argument for the existence of God or a creator.
1 Reasoning Under Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence Chapter 9.
The Fate of the Universe
ORIGINS Confronting Evolution What is evolution? Six arenas' of evolution study Great questions for evolutionists.
By: Deanna Jones.  The discovery of evolution is one of the most powerful scientific achievements of all time.  Evolution explains why Earth is so diverse.
Do You Think You Might Like to be a Scientist? Dewey Lawson Physicist Professor at Duke University.
© Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Nature of Science & Scientific Investigations. The Scientific Method “The Scientific Method” –FORGET IT!!! There isn’t ONE right way to do science! –The.
Lecture 4  The Paleolithic period (or Old Stone Age) is the earliest period of human development. Dating from about 2 million years ago, and ending in.
 Some general thoughts before we start.  Try to find out something from each member of the camp staff.  Not the proper mechanic or signal. Rather try.
WILLIAM PALEY "If we received a single intelligent signal containing information from space then we would conclude that there is intelligent.
Teleological arguments for God’s existence
Darwinian evolution MORE THAN JUST A THEORY?. DO YOU AGREE?
Aquinas's 2nd & 5th arguments for God - 1 Aquinas’s arguments for the existence of God zAquinas’s famous 5 argument appear in both the Summa Theologica.
AP Physics 1: Unit 0 Topic: Language of Physics Learning Goals: Compare and contrast object and system Define the make up of an object of a system of objects.
The Uniqueness of our Universe A Physicist’s Point of View Dr. Paul Ohmann University of St. Thomas November 30, 2012.
1. What does the text say? ● After actively reading the article and talking to the text, you are ready to tackle the close and critical reading assessment.
1. What does the text say? After actively reading the article and talking to the text, you are ready to tackle the 4 square. The first box is asking for.
Origins of the Universe. How did it all get here? How did it all get here? MANY THEORIES!!!! MANY THEORIES!!!! Big Bang Theory Big Bang Theory Steady.
HUME ON THE ARGUMENT FROM DESIGN (Part 1 of 2) Text source: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, parts 2-5.
LECTURE 23 MANY COSMOI HYPOTHESIS & PURPOSIVE DESIGN (SUMMARY AND GLIMPSES BEYOND)
Modern Versions of the Teleological Argument Today you will be learning two types of modern design arguments and their supporting philosophers.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
 In 1917, Albert Einstein realized that his General Theory of Relativity pointed to a universe with a beginning at some point in the past. Instead of.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
Revision Notes Courtesy of Mr Dixon. Instructions This PowerPoint has all the information you need to complete your Revision Booklets for the Science.
By Jagrav and Rahul.  Theist - A person who believes in God  Atheist - A person who believes there is no God  Agnostic - A person who believes we cannot.
The 2009 Gifford Lectures University of Aberdeen Lecture 3: The Mystery of the Constants of Nature Professor Alister McGrath King’s College, London.
Philosophy of Religion
Responses to the Design argument
Christian Theism vs. Naturalism+
AO1 Comparison questions
Paley’s design argument
Learning to Think Critically
Michael Lacewing Hume and Kant Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The Anthropic Principle
Chapter The Nature of Science.
How can I be sure I know something?
The Teleological Argument for the existence of God
Nature of Science & Scientific Investigations Physical Science Honors
Learning to Think Critically
Cosmology.
You!!! Questions for the Lab were due at Midnight
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

THE DESIGN ARGUMEN T DESIGN ARGUMENT IGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGUMEN DESIGN ARGUMENT IGN ARGUMENT DESIGN ARGU DESIGN ARG DESIGN AR DESIGN

KINDS OF DESIGN ORDER *THE UNIVERSE IS ARRANGED* Quantitative sequences (orderly arrangements) Regularities of spatial compresence Regularities of temporal succession

KINDS OF DESIGN PURPOSE ARRANGEMENT REFLECTS A PLAN OF THE DESIGNER Biological vs. Nonbiological e.g. body functions, eyes, etc. = biological e.g. freezing point of water, answer to prayer = nonbiological

KINDS OF DESIGN SIMPLICITY THE UNIVERSE IS A RESULT OF A SINGLE, RATIONAL, EFFICIENT MIND The Grand Unified Theory = one simple theory which unifies forces e.g. an apple falling and the galaxy rotating all because of the Law of Gravity

KINDS OF DESIGN COMPLEXITY THE UNIVERSE IS COMPLEX Simple unity with complex diversity shows great design EXAMPLES: Snowflakes Organic compounds and DNA

KINDS OF DESIGN BEAUTY BEAUTY POINTS TO A GRAND ARTIST BEAUTY IN MATH POINTS TO A GRAND MIND The world demonstrates objective beauty (e.g. sunsets) Beauty is not necessarily connected with survival This leads to a Creative Designer

KINDS OF DESIGN SENSE & COGNITION WE CAN PERCEIVE AND THINK ABOUT THE WORLD Our senses did not evolve out of survival value 1. We dont need to know truth from falsity to survive 2. Senses we use to accurately think about our world go beyond what we need to survive

KINDS OF DESIGN INFORMATION INFORMATION EXISTS OUT OF AND PRIOR TO THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE PARTS- MEANING EXISTS IN THE AUTHOR High order, little information = snowflakes High order, high information = living organisms, DNA

KINDS OF DESIGN COSMIC CONSTANTS *ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE* The universe unfolded with life in mind CONSTANTS: 1. 1:1million million chance the big bang expansion rate would be accurate % accuracy in material of observable universe being evenly distributed 3. No life could be possible had all the forces in the world been slightly smaller or larger 4. 1: ten billion chance of balance of matter to anti-matter 5. Only on earth is life possible and probable 6. Formation of life from non-life is 1x chance

KINDS OF DESIGN COSMIC CONSTANTS PROPER USE OF DATA: Christians supposedly argue that… -It is amazing that life is here and not somewhere else -It is amazing that factors necessary for life came before us instead of something else They are really saying… -It is amazing that life came about at all

KINDS OF DESIGN COSMIC CONSTANTS It is hard to resist the impression that the present structure of the universe, apparently so sensitive to minor alteration in the numbers, has been rather carefully thought out... the seemingly miraculous concurrence of [these] numerical values must remain the most compelling evidence for cosmic design. - theoretical physicist Paul Davies

FORMS OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT SYNTHETIC A PRIORI ARGUMENT This argument takes truths, and makes logical arguments from them e.g. meaning and information must come from a mind = a statement, so… If DNA has information and meaning, it must come from a mind

FORMS OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT ARGUMENT FROM ANALOGY Argued by generalizations e.g. = living organisms are like machines, machines are made by a mind, so… organisms must be made by a mind

FORMS OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT PROBABILITY ARGUMENTS Possibility View: outcomes must be equally possible Frequency View: Probability statements are essentially statistical summaries Evidential View: Focuses on how, and to what extent evidence confirms a proposition There needs to be a plan behind the formation of bodies

Presented by: