International Evaluation Conference 3–4 March 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
Advertisements

The Operational P The Operational Programme adopted by the European Commission The ESPON 2013 Programme EUROPEAN UNION Part-financed by the European Regional.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Cohesion Policy focus on performance experiences of the Hungarian Presidency Dr. Györgyi Nyikos Deputy State Secretary for Development Affairs Ministry.
Christina Skantze. Baltic Sea Strategy initiative – why? New political context for cooperation – EU-enlargement, integration Underline priorities and.
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Regional Policy Meta-Evaluation Some Reflections Evaluation Conference, Warsaw 12/13 November 2012 Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation DG for Regional.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Prof. Liviu Matei. I. The Bologna Process Researchers’ Conference I. Main conclusions and recommendations from the second edition of the Conference.
Policy coordination process in AttractSEE project and Spatial Plan of Republic of Serbia Jelena Miljković, Siniša Trkulja Republic Agency for Spatial Planning,
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Workshop on the Legal Framework of EU Structural Funds’ Management for the Period Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006 Head of Division, Preben.
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
The European agenda on improving the efficiency of employment and social policies: Bratislava, December 2011 The example of social experimentation.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Fostering the urban dimension Analysis of Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation Antoine SAINT-DENIS and Szilvia KALMAN, European Commission - DG Employment, social affairs and.
The Roles of Users in Enhancing Utility of Evaluation With Special Reference to the International Evaluation on the Funding and Management Performance.
Regional Policy How are evaluations used in the EU? How to make them more usable? Stockholm, 8 October 2015 Kai Stryczynski, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Landscape of social innovation in Poland Brussels, May 2014.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Strategic Planning and Future of Cohesion Policy after 2020 Panel 2 “Strategic Planning as an X-factor for effective management of ESI funds“ (V4+4 Conference;
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
Mihai Iacob – junior researcher INSTITUTE OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, Bucharest , Tallinn, Estonia Overview of the implementation of NQF in Romania.
Ministry Of Education and Higher Education National Tempus Office Palestine TEMPUS PROGRAM PREPARED BY National Tempus Office – Palestine 2009 European.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
SEN PEER REVIEW Access to finance Introduction
Fourth Overall Performance Study
Danutė Burakienė, the Ministry of Finance
Evaluation : goals and principles
Lithuanian Standards for Evaluation of EU Structural Funds
Mattia Agnetti – INTERACT Programme Secretariat
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Presentation ESF performance report AIR 2016 ESF Technical Working Group 9 February 2018 Brussels Costanza Pagnini.
Public Sector Modernisation How do governments learn?
EUPAN DG-Troika 3rd May 2007, Berlin Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
Supporting Cities and Regions through Projects and Programmes
Future of the ESF ESF Committee Amsterdam, 15/06/2016.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
The Learning Networks under the ESF
Ex-post evaluation of the ESF
COLLABORATION with Centre for Research on Impact Evaluation
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
EUPAN DG-Meeting Innovative Public Services Group (IPSG)
Need for a strong Commission for healthcare
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
The Republic of Lithuania
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Support Tools for ESF Evaluation
Christine Kormann Eurostat Task Force Integrated Planning ESS RDG
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café
Evaluation of ESF support to Gender Equality
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

International Evaluation Conference 3–4 March 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL International Evaluation Conference WHAT’S NEW AND WHAT WORKS IN THE EU COHESION POLICY 2007–2013: DISCOVERIES AND LESSONS FOR 2014–2020 The Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania, in attempt to encourage more widespread and better use of evaluation as a management tool, regularly organises international conferences dedicated to evaluation-related organisational and methodological issues. The 4th international evaluation conference was held in the interesting and intensive period. The implementation of operational programmes for 2007–2013 has reached half-way, first results are emerging, and problems are being addressed. At the same time, preparation for the programming period 2014–2020 is intensifying.. I would like to present the main findings of conference. 3–4 March 2011, Vilnius, Lithuania

CONTENT TARGET GROUP, THEME AND OBJECTIVES CONFERENCE STRUCTURE AND FINDINGS

SECTION 1 TARGET GROUP The conference brought together representatives of EU Structural Fund administrations, the European Commission, evaluators, representatives of the academic sector and other experts with an interest in the EU Cohesion Policy and evaluation – 150 participants

OBJECTIVES AND THEMES (1) The aim of this conference was twofold: to take stock of EU Structural Fund evaluations analysing the implementation of instruments, methods and interventions newly introduced (or abandoned) in the 2007–2013 period as well as to discuss whether evaluation is already being used as an integrated programme management tool. Do new instruments, methods and interventions introduced in the Structural Fund framework for 2007–2013 work? Should they “travel” to the next programming period? What lessons should be taken into account to make certain instruments more effective in 2014–2020? Is there anything that was unjustifiably given up in this period and therefore should be “re-discovered”?.

CONFERENCE STRUCTURE Strand 1 – Focus on Evaluation as a Management Tool (focused on the question whether the evaluation of EU Structural Fund programmes has become a more useful (management) tool and how it can be put to even better use in the forthcoming period). Strand 2 – Sharing Evaluation Findings (took stock of the EU Structural Fund evaluations and discussed “what works, what does not work and what is lacking in 2007–2013” focusing on the new forms of support as well as intervention areas where there have been changes compared to 2000–2006). The Closing Session of the conference discussed the future of EU Cohesion Policy after 2013.

STRAND 1 – MAIN FINDINGS Evaluating Evaluation – Do We Use it As a Programme Management Tool? (Discussion whether promises of and expectations related to on-going evaluation are being met in practice, to what extent EU Structural Fund administrations use evaluation as a programme management tool and share ideas about the role of evaluation in 2014–2020). What is the situation across the EU . Increasing political call for focus on results. (presenter Antonella Schulte-Braucks , Terry Ward) Intervention logic of operational Programmes be based on solid evidence of effectiveness, derived from past evaluations or from general social science research.(presenter Alberto Martini) Strategic management system and the concept of “theories of change” (presenter Benedict Wauters)

STRAND 2 – MAIN FINDINGS (1) EU Structural Fund Support to Public Sector Institutional and Administrative Capacity – What Results Can be Expected? (To discuss the effectiveness of support to institutional and administrative capacity building and consider methodological issues arising in evaluation of capacity building interventions). ECORYS report „Assessment of Administrative and Institutional Capacity Building Interventions and Future Needs in the Context of European Social Fund“ (presenter Artur Nowak) Evaluation of contribution of ESF projects to higher quality, better transparency and lower bureaucratic burden in public administration (presenter Oto Potluka). How to Make Impact Evalluatiion Feasiiblle and Cheap (presenter Paolo Severati) ESF support to administration capacity building: how to design successful interventions and how to assess their impacts? State of play – physical and financial implementation (presenters Agnieszka Sternik, Łukasz Wardyn, EC)

STRAND 2 – MAIN FINDINGS (2) EU Structural Fund Support to Innovation: to What Extent, When and What Investments Are Effective? Insights from Evaluations (To discuss to what extent, when and what investments to support innovation are effective. Methodological issues arising in evaluation of support to innovations also was considered) Presenters: Enrico Wolleb, Alasdair Reid, Atilla Beres and Tamas Boor, Agne Paliokaite, Edgaras Leichteris, Monika Petraite, The new approaches towards innovation policy and evaluation Evaluation issues New innovation policies for converging countries

STRAND 2 – MAIN FINDINGS (3) Are EU Cohesion Policy Instruments Suitable for the Achievement of the Policy Objectives? The Case of Innovative Instruments. (round table discussion) Policy lessons from experimentation with Regional Programmes for Innovative Actions (RPIA) ( presenter Tomasz Jerzyniak) Financial Engineering – a New and Better Way to Use EU Structural Funds? What is a microcredit? (presenter Dietrich Englert) Financial engineering in Lithuania: achievements and prospects (presenter Klaudijus Maniokas) Financial engineering solutions in EE (Helene Ryding) Financial Engineering: an innovative way to use EU Structural Funds (Dorota Kalina Zaliwska)

CLOSING SESSION: EU COHESION POLICY AFTER 2013 Overview of the strategic context surrounding and influencing preparations for the new programming period 2014–2020; discussion the future directions of the Cohesion Policy. Context for reform, EU budget reform: current state of play, Current Cohesion policy – eligibility/funding . Which way forward? – Commission proposals, Member State perspectives. (presenter John Bachtler). What do we need for Cohesion Policy in 2014-2020? (presenterJohn Bradley) Challenges for the Future of Cohesion Policy (presenter Ana Stankaitienė)

Thank you for your attention! STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your attention! Vilija Semetiene, Deputy Head of Evaluation Division EU Cohesion Policy and Structural Assistance Coordination Department Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania Phone: +370 5 8 239 4496 E-mail: d.semetiene@finmin.lt