Advisory Committee Meeting #3 July 17, 2013 6:30 p.m. Downtown Livability Initiative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Zions Bank Public Finance DRAFT COPY October 18, 2012 Business License Fee Study Business License Fee Study.
Linden Hills Small Area Plan WorkshopWorkshop April 24 & 25, 2013.
Presentation of the proposed Annex 19 – Safety Management
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Airport Sustainability is a holistic approach to managing an airport to ensure Economic viability, Operational efficiency, Natural resource conservation,
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Rossmore Secondary Plan Presentation to Council July 16, 2014.
1. 2 o Initial Affordable Housing Ordinance adopted in 1997 o Community College District Ordinance adopted in 2000 required 15% affordable housing. o.
Residential Development in Rural Lands Study STEERING COMMITTEE 7 February 15, 2006.
North-East Columbia Sub-Area Plan May 20 Informational Sharing and Gathering.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Atlanta Strategic Action Plan ASAP Partial Update Department of Planning and Community Development The Bureau of Planning APAB Committee Meeting May 19,
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Advisory Committee Meeting April 16, :30pm Downtown Livability Initiative.
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
City of North Richland Hills TOD Code Overview. Comments from November 20 Work Session Need to ensure the preservation of key historic assets in the Smithfield.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Center City 2020 Vision Plan Update. Agenda IntroductionMark Hahn Mecklenburg County OverviewHarvey Gantt 2020 Plan Co-Chair Community Engagement Michael.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Springfield Zoning Ordinance Revision Project Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame April 25, 2006 Planning and Economic Development Office Sponsored by a grant.
Downtown Incentive Zoning International Downtown Association September 22, 2012 Jason Wittenberg, AICP.
DC Zoning Review Low/Moderate Density Residential Working Group DC Office of Planning Meeting 1 March 24, 2008.
Timeline History NOV 2007 Community process began MAY 2009Draft Recreation and Open Space Element released JUL 2010 Funding for the environmental review.
HUMPHREY STREET OVERLAY DISTRICT 2015 Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment Public Information Session.
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE Meet need for higher density housing Preserve existing neighborhoods & connection to nature.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Wycombe Development Framework How do we see Wycombe in 25 years time? Flackwell Heath Residents Association 29 March 2005.
South Lake Union Urban Design Framework Report to the Seattle Design Commission September 17, 2009.
Public Open House Thursday, March 19, 2009 TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride Location Study Village of Montgomery, Illinois Public Open House TOD Plan & Park-and-Ride.
City of Suwanee 2030 comprehensive plan. TODAY’S AGENDA Process Update Community Agenda Framework “Compass” Review  Images and Questions  Comp Plan.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
IMPACT OF ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ON Redevelopment of North Toronto Collegiate Institute February 19, 2004 Architects Crang and Boake Inc. Teeple.
OLDE TOWN ARVADA TOD Update to RTD Board September 3, 2013
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Downtown Development Review The Review Process and Preserving Downtown Character.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Potential Neighborhood Development Strategies 158 acres Close.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Urban Design and Livability Bruce Monighan AIA Urban Design Manager, City of Sacramento City of Sacramento Planning Academy March 16, 2016.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Presentation to City Council May 2, 2016.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 2 | May 20, 2014.
Planning Commission Work Session February 19, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 1 – ANNEXATION, PLANNING AREA, AND DENSITIES 11/07/2013.
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw MPC Information Session December
Airdrie Land Use Bylaw Municipal Planning Commission April
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Inclusionary Zoning Housing Committee August 1, 2016.
Residential Building Height Standards
Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning Update
Future Land Use Chapter
Louisville Metro Comprehensive Plan
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
Grandview Heights, Ohio Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2018
254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
Establish New Park Space in the Central District & Appropriate Funds to Acquire a Portion of an Existing Parking Lot for Conversion to Park Space March.
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Royal Leamington Spa Neighbourhood Development Plan 2029
Presentation transcript:

Advisory Committee Meeting #3 July 17, :30 p.m. Downtown Livability Initiative

Downtown Livability Overall Process Public Scoping (Nov 2012) Land Use Code Audits (June 2013) WE ARE HERE – July 2013 Identification of Range of Alternatives Analysis of Alternatives Identification of Preferred Alternatives Alternatives Refinement and Development of Final Recommendations Transmittal of Recommendation from Advisory Committee to Council Review by Planning Commission City Council Consideration/Adoption Process 2 Continuous Public Engagement

Downtown Livability July 9-10 Open Houses/Focus Groups Focus Group Guide w/ summary info on code audits & specific questions; Full audits available as well 45 individuals attended –About half new to Livability focus groups/did not attend in March Comment cards to continue to come in through July 31; report completed thereafter 3

Downtown Livability Downtown Subarea NE 12th St 100th Ave NE Main St I-405 Single Family Lake Washington 4

Downtown Livability Series of Neighborhoods/Districts 5

Downtown Livability Signature Streets 6

Downtown Livability Ideas Generated from Past Work 7

Downtown Livability Questions: Building Height and Form Key policy issues: Should building heights and their urban form be modified to better achieve the Downtown vision? –If so, what areas should be analyzed (Core, Mixed-Use District, DT-OLB District, Ashwood, Old Bellevue, Perimeter Areas, others)? And why? –Should iconic roof features be allowed to exceed building height limits? If so, where should this be analyzed? –Should differences between residential and non-residential buildings be addressed? –Should provisions for increased floor plates above certain thresholds be studied? What areas should be analyzed? 8

Downtown Livability Previous Committee Comments Building Height and Form: Summary of 6/19 Discussion Iconic skyline would be good for Bellevue; different ways to accomplish. The wedding cake approach is appropriate; Take terrain/topography into consideration relative to the wedding cake. Examine increased building heights, particularly in the core area (though there are limited properties that would be benefit in DT-01). DT-OLB could support more height, though avoid creation of a wall from I-405. Flexibility to look at heights on a site-by-site basis to result in better overall effect. Consider increasing floor plate sizes for some of the districts. Equalize the FAR between residential and non-residential. Density transfer could be used to support affordable housing. Allow height to create more open space, green spaces, places to play recreate. Changing architectural form of buildings is easier for residential towers. If the base density (FAR) is not economically viable, it should not be in the code. 9

Downtown Livability From July 9/10 Focus Groups Building Height and Form: July Focus Groups/Comments Examine taller heights; a lot of Bellevue buildings feel short and boxy; would allow for more open space Should not alter wedding cake approach too much Like unusual building designs – adds interest to the skyline Additional height could be appropriate in Core and DT-OLB Should be variation built into height system (certain % difference) Caution in Perimeter Areas, protect adjacent neighborhoods Be careful about anything that adds to traffic impacts Iconic roof features are very important Height and density provisions should favor residential; opposing view is that development type should follow the market Look at needs of employers regarding floor plates 10

Downtown Livability Questions: Amenity Incentive System Key policy issue: How should the Amenity Incentive System be updated to meet evolving market conditions and integrate newer thinking about desired Downtown amenities? –What existing amenities do you think provide a high level of public benefit? –Are there new items missing that should be analyzed for potential inclusion? –Should a fee-in-lieu system be considered? 11

Downtown Livability Previous Committee Comments Amenity Incentive System: Summary of 6/19 Discussion Amenities should enhance livability for Downtown and surrounding neighborhoods. Make Downtown more inviting and friendly to families. Existing policy direction regarding housing affordability. More flexibility and needs to make economic sense. Remove amenities that are not having any effect. Move some items from amenity list to requirements (e.g. weather protection). Consider items such as fire station, public parking facility, incentives for iconic building features and green spaces. Assess the need for a school and get input from BSD. 12

Downtown Livability From July 9/10 Focus Groups Amenity Incentive System: July Focus Groups/Comments Update system to allow greater flexibility now and evolve over time with changing needs. Customize amenities by Downtown neighborhood. Use tiers of amenities; let developers choose from grouping Consider how affordable housing could be included in system. Focus on pedestrian experience, including outdoor plazas, green spaces, parks, etc. More attention to: water features, drop-off areas, green space, entertainment, art, recreation. A fee-in-lieu system should be one of the options considered. 13

Downtown Livability Questions: Design Guidelines Key policy issue: How should design guidelines be refined to improve the livability and character of Downtown? –As the design guidelines are reviewed, what elements should receive the most attention? –How can the guidelines ensure quality design, while providing a balance between predictability and flexibility? 14

Downtown Livability From July 9/10 Focus Groups Design Guidelines: July Focus Groups/Comments Focus on the pedestrian experience when looking at guidelines; including Pedestrian Corridor guidelines Attention should be given to creating distinct Downtown district/neighborhoods Guidelines need to provide more clarity throughout – be less subjective Concern about more above-grade structured parking – urban design implications 15

Downtown Livability Next Steps Next scheduled Advisory Committee Meeting, Sept. 18 Ideas for additional stakeholder engagement in September 16