Maglica v. Maglica What is Mrs. Maglicas fair share?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consideration Definition: X promises not to file a suit against Y if Y pays him $100 by a fixed date. The forbearance of X is the consideration for Y's.

Advertisements

Dissolution of Marriage and Community Property. Dissolution of Marriage In Washington, divorce is called Dissolution of Marriage and it is governed by.

Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Representing Plaintiff.

Superior Court of Orange County, California Attorney for the Plaintiff.

Chapter 17 Contracts — Breach of Contract and Remedies.

GODLY HOMES In an ungodly world (8) An ongoing study of the Home as God’s Word teaches.

Chapter 11 Contracts — Consideration. Introduction Consideration is legal value given in return for a promise or performance. Must have something of legal.

1 LandCo/City of Colorado Springs Settlement Agreement Summary of Key Elements July 31, 2009.

The Married Persons Equality Act 1 of 1996

 State laws prescribe the requirements that must be met to be married.  Parents are entitled to deduction on their taxes for each dependent  Family.

1 Forward and Future Chapter A Forward Contract An legal binding agreement between two parties whereby one (with the long position) contracts to.

Law for Business Mr. Bernstein Notes, pp Legal Considerations of Marriage December 5, 2014.

Chapter 12 Contractual Aspects of Marriage & Divorce

© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 34 Entrepreneurship, Sole Proprietorships, and General Partnerships.

Unit 1 Classifying the Law. PP#2 Mr. Andrez

P A R T P A R T Contracts Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent 3 McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

SMALL CLAIMS COURT. Small Claims Court  Sometimes referred to as “the people’s court”  Informal and inexpensive way for settling disputes  Claims of.

Chapter 16 Marriage Matters Part 2. Learning Goals  1) In this part of the chapter, we will explore the social dimension of marriage.  2) We will understand.

Divorce hw8D9w4s8http:// hw8D9w4s8 Funny 1xPMymBGohttp://

Linda Watts | Ruth Wagner

CHOOSING THE RIGHT FORM OF OWNERSHIP ENT 12. WHAT ARE THE CHOICES? A new venture can be established as:  a sole proprietorship  a partnership  or a.

© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 53: Family Law Chapter 53: Family Law Business Law Legal, E-Commerce,

PARTNERSHIP ? It is the relationship between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all.

Opening Statement Maglica v Maglica, 1993 Judge Polis, Orange Co., CA.

Chapter 15 Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies

Contractual Aspects of Marriage and Divorce. Marriage- A legal union of a man and a woman as husband and wife. Marriage- A legal union of a man and a.

What Constitutes Marriage? Today there is much confusion about marriage, divorce and re-marriage. Before you dive into the deep study, there must be some.

BUSINESS LAW LECTURE 2 PARTNERSHIPS. WHAT ARE WE GOING TO STUDY? What is a partnership? The regulation of a partnership The relationship between partners’

Assignment, Delegation, and Breach of Contract. Objectives  Define assignment and identify when a right has been assigned  Define delegation and differentiate.

INTRODUCTION The law requires that the parties to an agreement intend that it be legally enforceable. such intention mat be express or implied from the.

Legal Document Preparation Class 6Slide 1 General Partnerships The general partnership has the following features: –Unlimited liability for all partners.

Opening Statement Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Orange County Court, Judge Robert Pullis 1994 Breach of Contract.

Chapter 14. Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.  Entrepreneur: A person who forms and operates a new business either.

38-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Maglica v. Maglica Case for the Plaintiff Opening Statement.

Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FAMILY LAW © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 53.

P A R T P A R T Partnerships 9 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Law, 13/e © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Forms.

Briefcase on Corporation Law IV Shareholders’ right —— Appraisal Right of Dissenters.

Cohabitation and the Law Baroness Deech DBE Gresham Professor of Law.

Maglica v. Maglica Case# Judge Robert J. Polis Superior Court of Orange County Attorney for Plaintiff – Claire Maglica.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE 1998.

Maglica v. Maglica Plaintiff’s Case

Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Chapter 30.

Marriage and Interdependent Adult Relationships in Canada Mel Lambert.

Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 32: Operation of General Partnerships By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.

Family Law What is Marriage?.

Chapter 5—Section 1 Contracts I.Understanding Contract Law A. Formal documents that you sign when buying or selling a home, buying a vehicle, or purchasing.

Chapter 34 Small Business, Entrepreneurship, and General Partnerships.

Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica State of California Superior Court January 1992 Representing Plaintiff- Claire Maglica.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. ISHMAEL v. MILLINGTON 241 Cal.App.2d 520, 50 Cal.Rptr.592 (1966) Case Brief.

Maglica v. Maglica Orange County Courthouse 1993.

OPENING STATEMENT Claire Maglica v. Anthony Maglica Superior Court of Orange County, CA June 1993.

An agreement that can be enforced in court; A promise or set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the.

Interpretation of past decisions

Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage Matthew 19:3-12.

Legal Aspects of Finance Slide Set 14 Matti Rudanko.

Opening Statement Maglica v. Maglica Superior Court of Orange County California 1994 Counsel for the Defendant.

Rights in property created and affected by the relationship of spouses

Common Law Marriage & Financial Responsibilities

Domestic Relations Laws

Chapter 34 Small Business, Entrepreneurship, and General Partnerships

Presentation transcript:

Maglica v. Maglica What is Mrs. Maglicas fair share?

Recovery of share of joint business assets Breach of contract by defendant (oral and implied)

Mr. and Mrs. Maglica engaged in a husband wife relationship for 20 years Mr. Maglica presented Mrs. Maglica as his wife Mrs. Maglica participated in the daily running and decision making of the business

It is the plaintiffs contention that twenty years ago she entered into a relationship with Anthony Maglica. She took his name and they both presented themselves as husband and wife in all aspects of their lives, including business. Mr. Maglica made an oral agreement that everything they accumulated together would be shared together including the business (Mag Instruments)

DateSignificant Event May14, 1971Anthony and Claire Maglica consummate their relationship as husband and wife. Mr. Maglica promises Mrs. Maglica an equal shall of all assets accumulated in the relationship. Both parties recognize this as their wedding anniversary July 1971 Anthony Maglica Registers as Mr. and Mrs. Anthony Maglica at the Crown Plaza Hotel in New York. Mr. Maglica purchases a wedding band for Mrs. Maglica and they exchange wedding vows at St. Patricks Cathedral, where they again commit themselves to each other as husband and wife. ? 1971Mrs. Maglica starts working at the fledging machine shop business, where she eventual became Executive Vice President of the company. She worked as an equal partner in the daily running, decision making and management of the company. 1992Mr. and Mrs. Maglicas relationship ends and the business has assets in excess of 150 million dollars which Mrs. Maglica help build.

Mr. Maglica will testify that Mrs. Maglica has no claim whatsoever to any part of the business they built together. Mr. Maglica will testify that there was no legal binding marital contract between himself and Mrs. Maglica, therefore she has no claim to any portion of the assets they accumulated together including the business (Mag Instruments). He will also testify that he made no agreements oral or implied about the share of the marital assets she would be entitled to if the relationship ended.

The defendant will have the court believe that he has no legal obligation to compensate Mrs. Maglica for her contribution in helping build their business. Mr. Maglica contends that he owes nothing to Mrs. Maglica, because they were not legally married. For 20 years Anthony Maglica presented Mrs. Maglica as his wife. They maintained a home together, he depended on her as any husband would depend upon his wife. They ran a business together and maintained a relationship as any husband and wife would. Mr. Maglica made an oral contract that stated Mrs. Maglica would receive half of his business assets. We ask the court to compensate and ensure Mr. Maglica upholds his duty as a husband to provide for his wife and make him accountable for the oral contract he made with his wife Claire Maglica.