Community based intervention for blood pressure: What works and what does not? Eric Peterson Journal of Indian College of Cardiology Volume 5, Pages S49-S53 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017 Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 BP at most recent clinic visit. Source: Navar AM et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5:352–357 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S49-S53DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017) Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Predictors of HTN control (Navar-Boggan et al, 2012). Source: Navar AM et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5:352–357 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S49-S53DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017) Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Provider-level variability, after adjusting for patient level factors variability (p < 0.005). Source: Navar AM et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5:352–357 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S49-S53DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017) Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Explanation for raised BP; and responses of treating physicians to raised BP in patients who were eligible for the change. Source: Navar AM et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5:352–357 Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S49-S53DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017) Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Impact of provider feedback (Not significant). Journal of Indian College of Cardiology 2015 5, S49-S53DOI: (10.1016/j.jicc.2015.03.017) Copyright © 2015 Indian College of Cardiology Terms and Conditions