Definitions of Levels of Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Developing people, improving young lives MTL: Challenges, Opportunities and Progress Dr Michael Day Executive Director for Training Training and Development.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
NNPS Teacher Performance Assessment System The Framework.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
1 Educator and Provider Support Grant Policy and Research Committee EEC Board October 6, 2014.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 4c: Communicating with Families 1 6/12/201 3.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 2d. Managing Student Behavior 1.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Professional Development Liaisons Workshop October 14, 2010 Creating a Culture of Continuous Improvement: Linking Faculty Evaluation and Professional Development.
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
The TxBESS Framework Dr. Jan Seiter Ms. Donna Dagar.
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
School Counselor Evaluation Pilot Training Barb Ashcraft, School Counseling Coordinator Nancy Cline, Coordinator Office of School Improvement September.
Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness Through Quality Evaluation June 9, 2011 ESU 10 Cindy Baum, Kelly Clapp and Denise O’Brien.
BHS Administration “Back to Basics – This is Our time” Part I
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
ICT curriculum designs, teacher practices and student understanding Micaela Manso Magdalena Garzón Cecilia Rodriguez Paula Perez Directed by:Funded by:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Oregon City School District December GOAL: Implement a performance based evaluation system for all certified staff in fall 2011 Adopt standards.
Special Education Educator Evaluation and Professional Growth.
Charlotte Danielson’s 2011 Framework for Teaching: Part 2 Laurie Gregory, Director of Curriculum April 8, 2013.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
 Field Experience Evaluations PSU Special Educator Programs Confidence... thrives on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Complex Activity of Teaching 4 domains of teaching responsibility 22 Components defining distinct aspects of the domains 2-5 elements describe specific.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Key Topic 3http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
History–Social Science: Unit 2, Key Topic 2http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
CHARACTERISTICS OF LIFELONG LEARNERS Assoc.Prof.Dr. Muhammed Turhan.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Australian Professional Standards for Teachers Unpacking the Standards
The Contribution of the Framework for Teaching to New York City’s Instructional Vision Charlotte Danielson
Please create a NAME TENT with large piece of paper and place in front of you. Respond to these questions on small piece of pink paper. What do you.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Mentoring and Coaching for an Enduring Primary Career
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS
Action Research Designs
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Framework for Teaching * Distinguished & Leadership Roles
Who are TEACHER EDUCATORS
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
The Framework for Teaching
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Danielson Framework for Teaching (FfT) Rubric Levels*
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Culturally Responsive Teaching
Evanston/Skokie School District 65
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Resident Educator Program
Professional Portfolio
PBC Mary dowling.
CPD: The Coaching & Mentoring Model
ECE1-4 Professionalism Definitions.
Teacher Practice Instruments
TESS For TEACHERS Arkansas Teachers
Presentation transcript:

Definitions of Levels of Performance Based on Charlotte Danielson’ Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching

Unsatisfactory does not yet appear to understand the concepts underlying the component the teacher can grow and develop in this area may represent teaching that is below the licensing standard of “do no harm.” it is very likely time for a supervisor to intervene represents a first priority for coaching

Basic appears to understand the concepts underlying the component and attempts to implement its elements implementation is sporadic, intermittent, or otherwise not entirely successful characteristic of student teachers or teachers new to the profession minimally competent for teachers early in their careers; improvement is likely to occur with experience, and no actual harm is being done to students.

Proficient clearly understands the concepts underlying the component and implements it well experienced, capable teachers will regard themselves and be regarded by others as performing at this level thoroughly know their content, they know their students, they know the curriculum and have a broad repertoire of strategies and activities to use with students have mastered the work of teaching while working to improve their practice

Distinguished master teachers and make a contribution to the field, both in and outside their school continuous reflection and self-renewal classrooms operate at a qualitatively different level from those of other teachers remains a goal for all teachers, regardless of how challenging it any be in any particular set of circumstances may never attain it consistently

Metaphor