BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL Lunch and Learn Families and Children Engaged in Services (FACES); a reform of the CHINS law January 23, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policy Analysis and Law Reform. Reform by law States obligation under the CRC (article 4) States parties shall adopt all appropriate legislative, administrative,
Advertisements

Joint Investigation Protocols Convening Presented by: Theresa Costello, MA Emily Hutchinson, MSSW The National Resource Center for Child Protective Services.
Summary of HB 86 Juvenile Provisions ODYS Director Harvey Reed Judge Theresa Dellick October 13, 2011.
Juvenile Law.
Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children.
1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
1 From a Child In Need of Services (CHINS) to Families and Children Engaged in Services (FACES) 1/28/2013 Children’s League A Snapshot of EOHHS activities.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Chapter 4 Probation. Precursors to American Probation Early legal practice in the United States was distinct from British common law: Security for good.
Duty to Report Child Abuse, Neglect, and Dependency in North Carolina Janet Mason Institute of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Legal Obligations of the Juvenile Justice System for Limited English Proficient Youth Sam Jammal Legislative Staff Attorney MALDEF.
CHILDREN & FAMILIES IN NEED OF SERVICES Amy Howell Southern Juvenile Defender Center Emory University School of Law.
Trends in Juvenile Justice State Legislation Meeting of OJJDP's Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice October 19, 2012 Sarah Alice Brown Director,
NURS 533 Victimology A. Student Introduction n Who is a “Juvenile”??? –Each state defines by age (15-17) –exceptions include violent crimes –For violations.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Behavioral Health Board Chapter 31, Title 39 Idaho Code.
Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.
Criminal Law and Young People
Reflecting on 20 Years of Advocacy. The Parent Support Network Is Formed In 1989, both the federal and state government put their money on the table and.
Reforms for Justice for Children: A Case Study of Belize Legal and Institutional Reform in Belize: Strengthening Child Protection Systems Presented by.
Slide 1 Promoting and Supporting Status Offense System Reform Presentation to National Conference of State Legislators June 23, 2014 Allie Meyer Vera Institute.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Justice System
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Juvenile Justice How and why juvenile justice differs from adult justice.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice A special category in the justice system created for youth—that is, in most U.S. jurisdictions, persons between the ages of 7 and 18.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
JUVENILE OFFENDERS SS8CG6 Juvenile- a child under 17 years of age.
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
Behavioral Health Board. As of July 1, 2014… Regional Behavioral Health Boards are established. The RAC and Mental Health Board will no longer exist.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Chapter 16.3 Young People and the Courts. Causes of Juvenile Delinquency In most states, anyone under age 18 is considered a juvenile – not yet legally.
The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch Young People and the Law
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Juvenile Justice. juvenile Persons under the age of 17.
Home Juvenile vs. Criminal Law Juvenile or Adult? Purpose of Punishment MN Juvenile Justice Juvenile Justice Jeopardy Juvenile Justice Jeopardy
Juvenile Justice Ch. 16.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Juvenile Delinquency CJ 150 Tom Woods We will begin at the top of the hour.
Regional Behavioral Health Boards Chapter 31, Title 39 Idaho Code.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Monday Which state court has jurisdiction of juveniles who commit specific serious and violent crimes? Who is considered a delinquent juvenile in Georgia?
Criminal Law and Young People. What Do You Think? The law is too lenient on young people – especially on those who commit violent offences. Young people.
In the Matter of C.H., A Youth under the age of Eighteen - Supreme Court of Montana On December 9, 1981, declared C.H., 14 years old, youth in need of.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Aim: How does the Juvenile Justice System operate in the United States.
Judicial Branch CH 13 CRCT Prep Books.  Laws are made in society to keep order.  Conflicts over these laws may be over… 1. Rights and duties of citizens,
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Criminal Law and Young People
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
Chapter 10.
LESSON OBJECTIVES Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Select Committee on School Safety - Prevention and Response Protocol Subcommittee Recommendations Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative.
Presentation transcript:

BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL Lunch and Learn Families and Children Engaged in Services (FACES); a reform of the CHINS law January 23, 2013

Senator Karen E. Spilka, Assistant Majority Whip of the Massachusetts Senate Nancy Allen Scannell Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children Erin Bradley Childrens League of Massachusetts PRESENTERS

First enacted in 1973 the CHINS law decriminalized four distinct juvenile behavior problems: Running Away Truancy Stubborn Child Failure to obey school rules and Allowed parents, legal guardians, truant officers and police to petition the court for services. THE CHINS STATUTE

The CHINS system had successes but it was widely viewed as failing to meet its intended goals. 54.3% of CHINS youth were arraigned for adult criminal offenses or juvenile delinquency offences within three years. Making them 2X as likely to be arraigned after a CHINS Petition than before. Families were torn apart as parents lose custody of their children during the CHINS Process Youth held in shackles and in lockup for non criminal offenses WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

WHAT WENT WRONG? Families were uninformed about the process prior to involvement The adversarial nature of the court process Singular focus on the child Precipitating behaviors viewed out of context Practices not standardized Lack of data collection Inconsistent availability of services Inadequate funding levels and failure to systematically integrate resources

SPARKING CHANGE Multiple Commissions study the effectiveness of the CHINS system and make recommendations for change. Advocacy organizations file bills to reform the system In 2005, Senator Karen Spilka, then Chair of the Joint Committee on Children and Families forms a task force to examine the CHINS system. In January of 2007, Senator Spilka and Representative Paul Donato filed new legislation to reform the CHINS system The bill was signed into law by Governor Deval Patrick in August of 2012

Ch. 240 of the Acts of 2012 An Act Regarding Families and Children Engaged in Services is intended to break down barriers between the juvenile court, parents, and the community, and create a second access point for children to receive necessary services. The main goal is to steer children away from juvenile justice involvement and support them in safely and successfully living at home and attending school.

MAJOR PROVISIONS De-stigmatizes the process by deleting the CHINS label for children receiving services; Prohibits children requiring assistance from being arrested, confined in shackles or placed in a court lockup; Establishes (over three years) community based access to services for youth and their families; Focuses on the child and family as a unit making parents full and active participants in their childs proceedings;

MORE MAJOR PROVISIONS Ensures that the child and family fully understand the procedures by requiring that information be given to parents in writing at the beginning of the court process; Requires school districts to establish truancy prevention programs as a precursor to a juvenile court referral; Creates a standardized data collection system to evaluate outcomes and ensure that children benefit from the new system and that resources are being used well.

IMPLEMENTATION Families and Children Requiring Assistance Advisory Board Executive Office of Health and Human Services The Juvenile Court Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Legal Services Practitioners Others

WHATS NEXT? SD 236 HD 773 An Act to expand juvenile jurisdiction, increase public safety and protect children from harm Includes almost all 17 year olds in the juvenile justice system (except those charged with first or second degree murder) Senator Karen Spilka Rep. Kay Khan SD 150 An Act relative to juvenile life without parole sentences Brings MA Law into compliance with the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that a mandatory sentence of life without the possibility of parole for a juvenile is unconstitutional Senator Cynthia Creem Rep. Liz Malia HD 1153An Act Relative to Parent Child Privilege Gives Parents the Right to decline to testify against their child in most criminal proceedings Rep. Michael Costello

INFORMATION For more Information… Boston Childrens Hospital Childrens Mental Health Campaign Childrens League of MA