Affirmative Action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Affirmative Action? 1961 – President Kennedy implements affirmative action executive orders directing federal agencies to pursue a policy of minority.
Advertisements

Civil Rights Define Explain how it relates to the Civil Rights Story in America Choose a picture that relates to the meaning.
1 Affirmative Action. 2 John F. Kennedy: Executive Order (1961) Used affirmative action for the first time by instructing federal contractors to.
Jessie Hauser. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke “ This landmark Supreme Court case imposed limitations on affirmative action to ensure.
Regents of the University of California v. Allan Bakke 438 U.S. 265, 98 S.Ct Argued October 12, 1977 Decided June 28, 1978.
Affirmative Action in Higher Education A Case Study of the Effects the Courts Have Had on the Admissions Processes of Higher Education Institutions.
Consider: Is “diversity” in the workplace or in educational settings a “compelling state interest”? If so, how is diversity defined, and how is it achieved?
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential hiring practices should be used in hiring.
Equal Protection of the Law Fourteenth Amendment Jessica Stickel Ashley Pollack Shannan Petchul.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Section 3
Chapter 5 Civil Rights. 14 th Amendment Equal Protection ◦ Supreme Court’s Standards  Race and Ethnicity (inherently suspect/strict/difficult to meet)*
Affirmative Action. Under Federal Affirmative Action laws and regulations, public universities receiving federal funds must: o Maintain minority admissions.
BY: WILL CLAYTON & GRIFFIN SMITH.  Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
Affirmative Action Chapter 6, Theme C. Affirmative Action Solution  Define it!  What are the two views of the practice?  Compensatory action (helping.
Equality of Results vs Equality of Opportunity Andrew Adair x Michael Dotson.
Affirmative Action “Positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in area of employment, education, and business from which.
Affirmative Action Debate 2009 Topic: A pro and a con position on the question of affirmative action as a tool for making college admission decisions will.
Margo Tillstrom Chris Makaryk Ariel Woldman Zach Morris.
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
Civil Rights and Public Policy Chapter 5 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman. Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry Government.
What is Equal Protection? 1. Derived from Declaration of Independence “We hold these truths … all men are created equal” “We hold these truths … all men.
Affirmative Action Has there been a move away from Affirmative Action in Recent Years?
The Struggle for Equality. Path to Abolishing Slavery The Constitutional Convention would have failed without a compromise on slavery. Counted slaves.
Undergraduate Admissions & Affirmative Action Maintaining Excellence In A Changing Environment Fall Executive Board Meeting August 19, 2003.
Equal Protection Jody Blanke Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law.
Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Block 2 Carl Turner. Regents of California vs. Bakke Argued on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 Decided on Monday, June 26, 1978.
Federal Civil Rights Laws Chapter 21 Section 3. Question As a Ten year old you bullied someone every day causing that kid great torment. Then you saw.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
SUPREME COURT CASES AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. WHAT IS IT?? Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including "race, color, religion, gender,
Objective 30D Understand the application and significance of the equal protection clause of the 14 th amendment, including its impact on legalized segregation.
Equal Protection and Civil Rights. Equal Protection “No state shall... Deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor.
Matt Selby. BROWN VS BOARD OVERVIEW Segregation was commonplace in many public areas in the United States in the 50s 12 parents filed a suit against the.
Regents of the university of California v. bakke
AP Government and Politics Chapter 19: Wilson Homework: Assignment 6: The LAST ONE Is “diversity” in the workplace or in educational settings a “compelling.
Chapter 7: Our Living Constitution. Our Living Constitution  Think of the Constitution as a “flexible document” that can be changed  What are some of.
Point systems – Affirmative action Thomas R. Stewart, Ph.D. Center for Policy Research Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany.
Regents of The University of California v. Bakke By Alicia M.
California vs. Bakke Anessa,Tierra and Keanna. Facts Covered under the 14 th amendment Bakke, a white medical school applicant,was turned and his spot.
Goal 5.06A “The Civil Rights Struggle” I: Struggle for Rights A: Discrimination= unfair treatment based on prejudice against a certain group. B: Civil.
Discrimination in Employment. Affirmative Action  Taking positive steps to remedy past and current discrimination in employment and education.
L EGAL I SSUES IN H IGHER E DUCATION : T HE S TUDENTS LS 517 Admissions & Diversity.
Objective: Students will identify how the US government has attempted to alleviate discrimination in order to evaluate if certain groups need more assistance.
Discrimination Chapter 43. What Is Discrimination? What Is Discrimination? Our legal traditions are rooted in part in a commitment to equality. Discrimination—
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
Section Outline 1 of 7 Our Enduring Constitution Section 2: A Flexible Framework I.The Role of the Supreme Court II.Equality and Segregation III.Equality.
1. Circle the correct answer from the choices in the sentences below. a) The theory that Americans, even though we come from different backgrounds, come.
Social Studies: Class, Cultural Capital & Upward Mobility
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case
Sexual Harrassment & Affirmative Action
Civil Rights.
Gov Review Video #48: Important Civil Rights To Know
Group Six Will Mason Tracy Epton Maile Kobayashi Susan Redick
Korematsu V. United States
Affirmative Action.
Lecture 42 Discrimination VI
Civil Rights.
Lecture 41 Discrimination V
OUR LIVING CONSTITUTION
Civil Rights.
Gratz v. Bollinger A Supreme Court Case
Civil Rights 10/8/07.
NOTES: Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Civil Rights for Women and LGBTQ
Civil Rights Chap 5, Day 3 Aim:.
Ap u.s. government & politics
Agenda- 1/18 GRAB A CHROME BOOK AND THE WORKSHEETS!
Civil Rights.
Presentation transcript:

Affirmative Action

What is it? Affirmative action programs grant preferences to underrepresented groups in admissions & hiring Programs are meant to make up for past and/or present discrimination

Legal Basis The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from denying persons equal protection under the law. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed to eliminate practices that favored white men.

University of California v. Bakke (1978) 16/100 medical school slots were reserved for minority/low income applicants Quotas: certain # must be admitted Bakke, a white male, was denied admission twice. Those admitted under the quota had lower MCAT scores and GPAs than Bakke.

The Bakke Decision The Court invalidated the quota as unconstitutional BUT upheld some affirmative action programs

Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Gratz, a white student, wanted admission to the University of Michigan 20 / 100 points were assigned to applicants from underrepresented minority groups.

Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter, a white student applied to law school Applicants were evaluated based on all information available in their files, including race.

Let’s look at how it worked…. Hand out points system Who’s right?

Gratz/Grutter Decisions Gratz won, SC threw out points system Grutter lost, because the Court found that racial diversity is a compelling state interest, and the admissions process looked at many factors

The Future Justice O’Connor said that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary. Today, narrowly tailored affirmative action programs are legal, but not mandated. A California initiative passed that eliminated affirmative action.

In CA…affirmative action is illegal due to a proposition Top % of each HS is automatically accepted at a UC or Cal State Is this fair?