Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) Status Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Advertisements

Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
2  A nonprofit, nonpartisan association  Represents highway and transportation departments in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Regulatory Affairs Personnel Training and Qualification (RA T&Q) Overview.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Ongoing Support for TDWG Lee Belbin TDWG Infrastructure Project Manager.
1 Emergency Management Standards EM- XML Consortium & EM Technical Committee Presentation to Steve Cooper March 18,2003.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
Technology Transfer Execution Framework. 2 © 2007 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Relationship Between Your EPRI Value and.
Scott Butson District Technology Manager. Provide professional to all district staff Professional development has been provided on a regular basis to.
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
0 Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Briefing to the Board June 20, 2003.
NUPIC Perspective Stan Mitchell – NUPIC Chair. Presentation Title2 NUPIC Overview NUPIC Organization established to accomplish the following objectives.
Standard Design Process Overview
CAPACITY BUILDING & INFORMATION SHARING [ SETUP OF NATIONAL WEBSITE ] – FIJI ISLANDS Ajnesh Chandra Area Organizer – NUFCW Fiji Trades Union Congress Suva,
Delivering the Nuclear Promise Overview
Industry Challenges-Quality Opportunities
Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) – Next Steps
District Training Assembly
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
Standard Design Process (SDP) Interfacing Procedures Ashley Taylor TVA
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Board Roles & Responsibilities
Getting More Involved with NFRC
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
FRAUD & ABUSE PRACTICE GROUP STRATEGIC PLAN
Roles and Responsibilities
Configuration Management (CM) Standard Performance Measures
Standards and Certification Training
SDP Software Presented by Bill Clover and Brad Diggans Bill Clover
AMCH PPS PAC Executive Committee Meeting August 27, 2015
Software and Systems Integration
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
FINAL (Living Charter)
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Standard Design Process (SDP) Change Management Ashley Taylor TVA
Valuing People Standing Committee
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group (www. cmbg
Description of Revision
School of EE and Computer Science
Delivering the Nuclear Promise: Standard Item Equivalency Process (SIE
Strategic & Operational Planning:
Jeff Marr, PMP Nikki Van Ingen, MSA, MT (ASCP)
By Jeff Burklo, Director
National Governing and Leadership Structure
ENG-008: Standard Digital Engineering Process
About The Federal Data Architecture Subcommittee (DAS) 2008
Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative Government-Wide Wireless Program Industry Day II December 5, 2011.
Standard Design Process (SDP) Software Tom Czerniewski Entergy Nuclear
Executive Committee Meeting May 18, 2018
SMSA Policy and Planning Committee
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee April 9, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
Policies, Procedures, and Best Practices IEEE AESS PANELS 2019 Prepared by the Technical Operations Committee Contents: Applying for Panel Approval Forming.
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
NM Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Presentation transcript:

Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) Status Update Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) Status Update Tom Czerniewski Entergy Nuclear

Agenda DOWG Background DOWG Charter and Members Current DOWG Activities Nuclear Community Website

DOWG Background Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) was originally formed in 2017 out of the Nuclear Promise Standard Design Process (SDP) initiative, ENG-003 Provides a permanent industry organizational structure to maintain the SDP: To review and consider feedback/changes to the process To review, approve and coordinate revisions to the industry procedure To review, approve and coordinate changes to the industry software

DOWG Charter - INTRODUCTION DOWG is chartered to promote effective execution of nuclear power plant design change processes Accomplished through standard industry procedures and promoting processes and behaviors that result in paramount focus on nuclear safety while effectively using utility resources Comprised of a representative cross section of utility and industry personnel dedicated to maintaining effective configuration control of nuclear power plants through implementation of SDP procedure IP-ENG-001

DOWG Charter - VISION and MISSION VISION: To achieve high levels of plant safety, reliability, and equipment performance through implementation of an effective and efficient design change process MISSION: To provide governance of the SDP and related procedures and to take action to improve the design change process throughout the nuclear power industry Identifying best industry practices Developing execution strategies

DOWG Charter - OBJECTIVES To Provide a forum for industry configuration management leadership Governance of the industry design change procedure, IP-ENG-001 Annual procedure / software reviews Coordinate revisions where needed Maintain and monitor standard industry design change qualification structure

DOWG Charter - OBJECTIVES (cont’d) Process implementation support, such as software, technical support tools, and interfaces with elements of other supporting processes Working group and product information maintained on the Nuclear Community web forum Provide methods for effectively communicating EOC direction that reviews adverse design quality trends and shares insight with other industry groups Coordinate with the Equipment Reliability Working Group (ERWG) for functional areas with the potential for overlap

DOWG Charter - MEMBERSHIP All commercial nuclear power utilities may participate in the DOWG as members One voting representative who is the lead for the member’s organization (one alternate allowed) Should have management support and sufficient seniority to make decisions during DOWG meetings Should be interested in working on tasks that benefit many stations in the industry beyond the representative’s utility or station

DOWG Charter - WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE Executive Oversight Committee (EOC) Provides support and advises the DOWG (and ERWG) on matters related to nuclear power plant reliability Chairperson Vice Chairperson Secretary (INPO representative) Software Users Group Standing subcommittee for interface with industry software users, the software vendor(s), and DOWG

WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE (cont’d) Subcommittee Chairpersons Lead subcommittee initiatives performed internal to the DOWG DOWG Committee positions (Chair, Vice Chair) effective for approximately one year Industry organizations with significant associations with the design change process will be informed of DOWG activities and appropriate liaisons established CMBG will be invited as non-voting member and industry interface

WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE (cont’d)

WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE (cont’d) DESIGN OVERSIGHT WORKING GROUP (DOWG) Chair Rich Hall* Exelon Co-Chair Ashley Taylor TVA Co-Chair Brian Dunn NextEra Utility Members Subcommittees Software Rich Hall Exelon Item Equivalency Bryan Griner Southern Nuclear Digital Eng Ashley Taylor TVA Representation of all utilities, either directly or via utility alliance member

WORKING GROUP STRUCTURE (cont’d) DESIGN OVERSIGHT WORKING GROUP (DOWG) All Members

DOWG Charter - FUNDING INPO will provide administrative support services for group communications, mailings, and product distribution The group will be afforded facility support within the capacity of INPO or EPRI facilities Members and organizations are responsible for providing their own travel and living expenses for DOWG meetings

DOWG Charter - CONDUCT OF BUSINESS The group will be guided by consensus If necessary, the Chairperson will establish appropriate methods for deciding any significant issue

Current DOWG Activities Activity Start / Finish Comments SDP Software Jan 2017 / December 2018 Pilot started in late 2017, industry roll-out in 2018 SDP Procedure (Rev. 1) Jan 2018 / Sept 2018 Coordinate with SDP software roll-out and other DOWG efforts Standardized Item Equivalency Process (SIEP)  April 2017 / July 2018 Piloted in 2017, coordinate with SDP software roll-out and SDP Rev. 1 ENG-008, Standardized Digital Engineering Process   Ongoing / Sept 2018 Coordinate with rev. to EPRI guide and SDP Rev. 1 Standardized Industry Metrics Complete No longer being pursued as industry effort Common Design Packages for Distributed Antenna System & Wireless Vibration Monitoring Systems Sep 2017 / April 2018 EPRI has issued report with common design pkgs

SDP Software Objective Deliverables Standardized software to facilitate compatibility and training to support implementation of the new process Deliverables Base software package for SDP (with optional interfaces) Compatible reader software tool where utilities can collaborate, search and post design change abstracts Refer to separate presentation on this topic

SDP Procedure (Rev. 1) Incorporate industry feedback on SDP process (~100 comments received to date) Add DAR Tier 1 topic for Nuclear Fuels/Reactor Eng, add or update various Tier 2 questions Various procedure and form enhancements / clarifications Incorporate changes due to: Software Standard Item Equivalency Process Standard Digital Engineering Process

SDP Procedure Revision Cycle for Rev. 1 2017 1&2Q2018 Issue 3Q2018 2018 SDP Revision Software Item Equivalency Digital Eng Industry Feedback

Standardized Industry Metrics Objective A standard set of industry Configuration Management indicators Deliverables A set of 8 common industry indicators 1. Engineering Change (EC) Delivery 2. Engineering Change (EC) Quality 3. Engineering Change (EC) Work List Stability 4. Impacted Document Updates 5, 6, 7. SDP Throughput (Design, Implement., Closeout Phases) 8. Temporary Modifications

Standardized Industry Metrics (cont’d) *** Based on March 2018 Engineering VP meeting, decision was made to no longer pursue this as industry effort Per separate Efficiency Bulletin EB 17-24, utilities can determine what specific Design / CM indicators to use, with the exception of Temporary Modification indicator

ENG-008, Standard Digital Engineering Process Objective A standard process for the design and implementation of digital modifications founded on the EPRI Digital Design Guide (TR 3002002989) Deliverables Nuclear industry Standard Process NISP-EN-04, Standard Digital Engineering Process, which leverages the Standard Design Process Standard digital modification content and deliverables Standard industry training and qualification Refer to separate presentation on this topic

Standard Item Equivalency Process (SIEP) Objective Provide a standard process to perform item equivalency evaluations Deliverables Nuclear industry Standard Process NISP-EN-02, Standard Item Equivalency Process which leverages SDP where appropriate Standard process that enables sharing of information between utilities and suppliers Standard qualifications and training for item equivalency evaluations Refer to separate presentation on this topic

Common Design Packages for Wireless Vibration Monitoring Objective EPRI to Develop Common Design Packages (via SDP) for Distributed Antenna System & Wireless Vibration Monitoring Systems Deliverable EPRI report 3002011820, Online Monitoring – Engineering Change Package Content for a Distributed Antenna System and Wireless Vibration Sensors (published on 4/30/18) DOWG participated in the review process Available to utilities to support plant modifications

Other Possible Future DOWG Activities Standardized Pre-Engineered Design Installation Standards Standardized Calculations Standardized Specifications Other?

DOWG Nuclear Community Website INPO NANTEL hosted site: https://community.nantel.org/working_groups/design_ove rsight_working_group_dowg/ Need to register Location for related materials Community forum for questions Available to US nuclear utility representatives and vendors that are members of the Supplier Participant Advisory Committee (SPAC) Speaker: Rick McAdams / Paul Hayes - Arizona There will be additional questions that come up as you start to use the process. Here is where you can go to look for answers and submit your own questions. Need Feedback during the Pilot process! We are looking to make the process better. If your comment is undeniably better or a fatal flaw it will probably be changed. If it is a personal preference, it may not get changed, but submit it anyway. Comments should go to your site SME or Nuclear Promise Representative. Questions can go on the Nuclear Community page. DOWG = Design Oversight Working Group SPAC = Supplier Participant Advisory Committee, includes most all the engineering vendors

QUESTIONS?