Tax Reform January 2013 Administration & Finance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relationship Between Educational Attainment, Personal Income, and Economic Strength AL AZ AR CA CO CT DE IL IN IA KY LA MD MA MS NJ NY ND OK OR SC SD UT.
Advertisements

Unemployment Insurance & Employment Service Reform A New Balance.
SMALL BUSINESS TAX COVERAGE Current Business Taxes and Extensions There were 58 Extensions to the tax code from 2013 to Individual 30 Business 21.
National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado Financing in Sync: Aligning the Pieces.
Executive Office for Administration and Finance State House Rooms 373 & 272 Boston, MA Tax Reform January 2013 Administration & Finance.
Why Reform Government? Federal Spending National Debt: $13.23 Trillion Federal Spending National Debt: $13.23 Trillion Your personal share? Over $42,000.
Introducing the budget World Bank Institute’s Parliamentary Staff Training Program.
FISCAL ENVIRONMENT 1. State Tax Capacity & Effort Indexed to U.S. Average Source: State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) AL AK AZ AR CA CO.
A Fair and Simple Tax System for Our Future: A Progressive Approach to Tax Reform January 2005.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Building Vermont’s Moral Economy Paul A. Cillo Public Assets Institute August
1  The IPM model projects increases in electricity prices as a result of the RGGI policy scenarios which, by themselves, would increase the household.
© 2011 Northern Trust Corporation ServiceExpertiseIntegrity Dennis Anosike Ph: The Changing Face of Public Pension Plans.
What is our Service We at ASSISTED TRANSITION are SENIOR ADVOCATES who specialize in COMPLIMENTARY Elder Care Referral Services. Our experts help seniors.
ECON chapter 9 1. __________ affect the factors of production & therefore, resource allocation.
Presentation to the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform May 11, 2005 Roland Boucher United Californians for Tax Reform.
Planning Together to Improve Outcomes for All Students U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary & Secondary Education (OESE) Office of Special.
State Trends in Premiums and Deductibles, : Eroding Protection and Rising Costs Underscore Need for Action Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President.
Gemmer Asset Management LLC Summary of 2013 Tax Changes January 16, 2013.
2014 NASACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE Stan Czerwinski State Fiscal Pressures 1.
Fiscal Policy and Taxes Test Review Ch. 14 and 15.
Tax Law and Tax Accounting Economics and Management School Lanzhou University of Technology.
PG CH. 14: THE CONGRESS, THE PRESIDENT, & THE BUDGET: THE POLITICS OF TAXING & SPENDING.
2017 Tax Reform Proposals and the Potential Impact to Vineyard Owners and Grape Growers Jay Silverstein, JD, LLM  Partner, Moss Adams, LLP Amy Smith, CPA,
The Impact of Federal Tax Reform on the States
Effects of Inflation on Project Cash Flows
Chapter 15 Investing in Bonds 15-1
Budget Forum 6:30 P.M., May 25, 2017.
GOVT Module 16 Taxes.
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
2017 CAHEC Partners Conference Federal Legislative Discussion
The California Gas Tax Swap Learning from a Failed Experiment
2b – Functions of Government and Government Finance
Presenting on behalf of the author team
Queen Anne’s County Commissioners FY2018 Proposed Budget April 24, 25, 26, 2017 Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Jonathan R. Seeman, Director,
TAXES.
Break-out Session 1A: State audit & controversy
Superintendent’s Proposed FY16-17 Budget
Tax Reform Session 5-6.
4th Annual Budget Breakfast, 23 February 2017 presented by
Tax Reform: House vs. Senate Plans
CIMA F3 Financial Strategy
Mark J. Ryan, Deputy Director Independent Fiscal Office
Types of Organizations
Chapter 7 Investments.
Queen Anne’s County Commissioners FY2018 Proposed Budget April 11, 2017 Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Jonathan R. Seeman, Director, Budget,
Amy Blouin, Executive Director
Georgia Fiscal Management Council
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Principles of Good Tax Policy
2b – Functions of Government and Government Finance
CT Association of Nonprofits BUDGET FORUM
Internal/External Sales Rate Development Level II
Dual Eligibles Across the States
Review What is the fundamental economic problem?
November 30, 2017 Taxes.
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
The Future of Renewable Energy in New England
Introduction to Taxation
Construction Market Funding Trends
Fiscal Policy: Spending & Taxing
© OnCourse Learning.
Topic 8:Taxes and Spending
Taxes 1.
Budget office overview
Franchise Fee Informational Meeting
Types of Organizations
Topic 8:Taxes and Spending
A Presentation to: Wisconsin Government Finance Officers Association
Presentation transcript:

Tax Reform January 2013 Administration & Finance

Our Goals In order to invest in education, innovation, and infrastructure, the Patrick-Murray Administration proposes to generate new revenue in accordance with these principles: Any proposal to generate new revenue must be comprehensive, allowing us to pay our bills, maintain what we have, and invest in new development to foster economic growth Any proposal to generate new revenue for transportation must be dedicated for that purpose Any proposal to generate new revenue must be competitive and fair, both allowing Massachusetts to compete with our neighbors and protecting the most economically vulnerable among us

Tax Revenue Proposal Status Quo New Rates Policy Changes Revenue Personal Income 5.25% $4,400/ $6,800/ $8,800* 6.25% $8,800/ $13,600/ $17,600* Increase rate to 6.25% (lower rate for short term capital gains to 6.25%) $2.57B $2.81B Increase personal exemption 2x ($1.09B) Eliminate 45 tax expenditures $1.33B Sales 4.50% Lower rate to 4.50% ($1.37B) ($1.10B) Tax custom modifications to canned software and related computer services $265M Corporate Income 8.00% Eliminate FAS 109 deduction $76M $194M Eliminate special classifications for security and utility corporations $83M Implement sales factor sourcing for services $35M Total $1.90B *Personal exemption for Single/Head of Household/Joint filers.

Impact to People

Allocation of New Tax Revenue: FY14-FY18 and FY23

Transportation Need for New Tax Revenue FY14-FY23 Transportation Financing Gap from “The Way Forward” Report Periodic, consistent fare/fee/toll increases (maintain real impact) and Western AET savings MassPort / Gaming / Convention Center contributions Indexing gas tax to inflation (maintain real impact) FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY23 $231M* $600M $700M $755M *FY14 allocation reflects items that can be implemented immediately and the launch of the capital program.

Transportation Need: Solutions from Current Tools (Not Including Gas Tax)

Transportation Need: Solutions from Indexing Gas Tax Indexing the gas tax to inflation, beginning in FY14, would generate $118M in additional revenue by FY21. Note: Analysis assumes 2% annual inflation.

Gas Tax Fully funding the transportation investment would require increasing the gas tax to 60 cents per gallon (47 cents after solutions from current tools). Data source: Federation of Tax Administrators.

Public Infrastructure Fund All sales tax will go to a new Commonwealth Public Infrastructure Fund Including amounts already pledged to the School Building Authority, the MBTA, and MassDOT Amounts pledged to the School Building Authority, the MBTA, and MassDOT pass-through the fund without harm to funds or bonds supported by those funds Amount pledged to MassDOT will be increased to cover transportation gap The fund may be used for direct expenditure by the Commonwealth, grants, or debt service related to any public infrastructure The fund is not intended for governmental infrastructure such as state offices or information technology, soft assets such as master plans, or administrative costs such as payroll

Sales Tax Dedicated Entirely to Transportation and Infrastructure Transportation ranges from 1.02 to 1.32 cents for FY15-FY23 (2.14 to 2.44 cents including the MBTA).

Economic Competitiveness: Comparison to Other States Highlighted comparison states include neighbors (CT, ME, NH, RI, VT), industry competitors (CA, NJ, NY, OH, PA), and those ranked best for business (CO, GA, NC, VA, TX).

Economic Competitiveness: Comparison to Other States Highlighted comparison states include neighbors (CT, ME, NH, RI, VT), industry competitors (CA, NJ, NY, OH, PA), and those ranked best for business (CO, GA, NC, VA, TX).

Personal Tax Expenditures Proposal eliminates 45 personal tax expenditures This simplifies the tax code If the goal is also a fairer tax code, reducing the sales tax and doubling the personal exemption is a more efficient way to achieve that result than retaining these personal tax expenditures Impacts on individuals must be considered in light of all tax changes in the proposal, including reducing sales tax and doubling personal exemptions

Personal Income Tax Expenditures: Proposed for Elimination

Personal Income Tax Expenditures: Retained

Corporate Tax Breaks Within the category of computer systems design and related services, 29 other states tax modifications to canned programs, and 14 other states tax custom programs With the migration of software first to the ‘web’ and now to the ‘cloud,’ the line between software (currently taxable) and computer services (not taxable) is becoming untenable, and making these distinctions is difficult both for DOR and taxpayers