AMERICAN STEEL CORPORATION Next class: Formosa Plastics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 (c) 2008 The McGraw Hill Companies Redesigning Teacher Salary Structures School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 12.
Advertisements

1.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Rewarding Business Performance Chapter 24.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Management.
ECO Monday, December 1 st –Organizational Design: Centralized vs. Decentralized –Readings, Brickley et al., Monday, December 8 th –Performance.
Capacity Planning. How much long-range capacity is needed When more capacity is needed Where facilities should be located (location) How facilities should.
Strategic Control Control is taking measures that synchronize outcomes as closely as possible with plans Traditionally, has been almost completely based.
Investment Centers and Transfer Pricing n Top managers of large companies evaluate their divisions as investment centers. The manager of an investment.
Pay for Performance and Financial Incentives
Chapter 15: Performance Evaluation and Compensation
CHAPTER 8 PRICING Study Objectives
Module 9 Motivation and Reward System Management
Introduction Organizations have a relatively large degree of discretion in deciding how to pay. Each employee’s pay is based upon individual performance,
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing.
Designing Compensation and Benefit Packages
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005 McGraw-Hill/Irwin 25-1 REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE Chapter 25.
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 9 Responsibility Accounting.
CHAPTER 15 Cost Analysis for Control. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Decision Making Strategic, Operational,
Performance Evaluation in the Decentralized Firm
Chapter 13 Business Unit Performance Measurement.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2005 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 1eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring, Monitoring,
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Accounting for Managers, 1Ce, Ch 13
16-1 Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Financial Performance Evaluation and Transfer Pricing in the Decentralized Firm.
Managerial Accounting:
Copyright © by Houghton Miffin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
Managerial Accounting: An Introduction To Concepts, Methods, And Uses Chapter 11 Investment Center Performance Evaluation Maher, Stickney and Weil.
Financial Performance and Transfer Pricing ACCT7320Controllership November 9, 2011.
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 20 Strategy, Balanced Scorecards and Incentive Systems.
Lecture 5 - Financial Planning and Forecasting
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial & Managerial Accounting The Basis for Business Decisions FOURTEENTH EDITION Williams.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2006McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Nine Responsibility Accounting.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Performance Evaluation Chapter 10 1.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Chapter 10 Incentive Issues IDIS 364 – Spring 2007.
Accounting 4310 Chapter 14 Business Unit Performance.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Contemporary accounting problems The first topic THE PART 2 Responsibility Accounting.
Directors’ Remuneration 1. Public Concerns O Board decides what to pay its members. O True shareholders approve, but they rarely turn down Board’s recommendation.
9-1 Fundamental Managerial Accounting Concepts Thomas P. Edmonds Bor-Yi Tsay Philip R. Olds Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
10-1 Decentralization: Responsibility Accounting, Performance Evaluation, and Transfer Pricing 10.
1 PowerPointPresentation by PowerPoint Presentation by Gail B. Wright Professor Emeritus of Accounting Bryant University MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING 10 TH EDITION.
12-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 3 rd edition by.
Fundamentals of Management
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Pay for Performance A strategic approach to design Dermot Hand August 2012.
Managerial Accounting: An Introduction To Concepts, Methods, And Uses Chapter 13 Investment Center Performance Evaluation Maher, Stickney and Weil.
Performance Evaluation Chapter 15 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
© John Wiley & Sons, 2011 Chapter 16: Strategic Performance Measurement Eldenburg & Wolcott’s Cost Management, 2eSlide # 1 Cost Management Measuring, Monitoring,
Managerial Accounting: An Introduction To Concepts, Methods, And Uses Chapter 14 Incentive Issues Maher, Stickney and Weil.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres, and reward systems Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint Slides.
10-1 Decentralization: Responsibility Accounting, Performance Evaluation, and Transfer Pricing.
CORNERSTONES of Managerial Accounting, 5e. © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part,
Chapter 3: Purchasing Research and Planning Strategic Planning for Purchasing Strategic planning for purchasing involves the identification of critical.
Performance Management and Evaluation 8. Performance Measurement OBJECTIVE 1: Define a performance management and evaluation system, and describe how.
Marketing II Chapter 2: Company and Marketing Strategy Partnering to Build Customer relationships
Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 12 Recognizing Employee Contributions with Pay Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
12-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Copyright © 2014 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin FUNDAMENTALS OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 5 TH EDITION BY R.A.
Chapter 14: Performance Measurement, Balanced Scorecards, and Performance Rewards Cost Accounting: Foundations & Evolutions, 8e Kinney and Raiborn.
Chapter 13 Financial performance measures for investment centres and reward systems.
REWARDING BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Financial performance measures and reward systems
Leadership Compensation Alignment
Presentation transcript:

AMERICAN STEEL CORPORATION Next class: Formosa Plastics

American Steel Corporation: Context An integrated steel producer with annual sales in 1993 of about $4.5 billion. Numerous divisions: Headquarters (St. Louis ) Warehouse Sales Division operated 21 field warehouses throughout the US half of sales were steel products (rod, bar, wire, tube, sheet, and plate) purchased from Mill Products Division disappointment in the performance of the Warehouse Sales Division Mill Products Division

Warehouse Sales Division: American Steel Corporation New Performance Measurement System Decentralize the management of the division each branch warehouse manager responsible for the divisions activities in his or her geographic area. compete with other producer-owned warehouses as well as with independently owned warehouses. purchased their steel products from the Mill Products Division at the same prices charged to independently owned metal supply warehouses.

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation: Issues Performance Measurement System Evaluate in depth the new incentive system. How, if at all, would you modify it? ROI What role should the new investment center incentive plan play in decisions such as Denvers lease-versus-own issue? Behavior with ROI as a performance measure

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Performance Measurement System responsibility to make the division grow, both in sales volume and ROI [return on investment], subject only to approval of the divisions annual profit plan and proposed capital expenditures by corporate headquarters. implementation required on the balance sheet

Effective Performance Measurement System

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Compensation Plan Components: 1. Base Salary determined on dollar sales volume of the districts in the prior year; the higher the sales volume, the higher the range for which the manager becomes eligible. actual salaries will be established by the Divisions general manager, salary ranges will be reviewed periodically in order to keep them competitive with those of other companies in the metal supply warehouse business. 2. Growth Incentive the manager will earn $500 for every $100,000 of increased sales over the prior year (i.e., 0.50 percent of any sales increase)

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Compensation Plan Components 3. Return on Investment Incentive an incentive will be paid in relation to the size of investment and return on investment. No incentive will be paid to a manager whose branch earns less than 12 percent pretax ROI. 50% of divisions earn less than 12% No increase in incentive payment will be made for performance in excess of 50 percent pretax ROI. No payment will be made in excess of $50,000, regardless of ROI performance. Sliding scale of performance

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation

Effective Performance Measurement System Given the goals of the company which alternative incentive will motivate the desired behavior? Process participatory and easy to understand by employees feed back provided Incentives congruent with reward systems – pay performance link various types of compensation (e.g. salary, bonuses, options) attainable performance levels responsibility and control is considered (overall vs. divisional)

Effective Performance Measurement System Given the goals of the company which alternative incentive will motivate the desired behavior? Alignment with Organizational Goals assesses progress toward organizational goals and objectives - promote intended behavior (critical success factors) Measures unlikely a single measure or even several measures will effectively assess performance a mix of financial and nonfinancial metrics absolute vs relative measures includes both short and long term metrics measures are observable (objective vs. subjective) limit ability to manage/manipulate outcome measures

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Given the goals of the company which alternative incentive will motivate the desired behavior? Process Incentives Alignment with Organizational Goals Measures

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Own vs Buy Im sure that the incentive compensation plan you put in last year is fair, but I didnt know whether it adjusted automatically for the difference between owning and leasing, and I just thought Id raise the question. …he said that hes getting a lot better return on investment in his district because hes in a leased facility

Warehouse Sales Division- American Steel Corporation Own vs Buy Lease vs Own is a financing not operating decision Current system appears to penalize managers in the short run who move to newer facilities As capital decisions are infrequent, the incentive system should not be designed with capital decision as a primary issue Suggest a process to deal with the impact of capital investment (e.g. upward adjustment in base)