Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor and Social Policy GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROTOCOL ON CHILD PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT.
Advertisements

Policy Analysis and Law Reform. Reform by law States obligation under the CRC (article 4) States parties shall adopt all appropriate legislative, administrative,
Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
The Children Act 1989/2004.  To discuss the background to the Children Act  To identify the key principles of the Children Act 1989  To discuss.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
The Analysis and Synthesis of Research Studies on Children and Youths entering the Justice System in Thailand. Researcher : Asst. Professor Dr. Sunee Kanyajit,
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING. Goals of Sentencing  In Section 718 of the Criminal Code a statement is found that gives judges some direction.
YCJA - Senior High Handout
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
Criminal Law and Young People
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
Legislation and Working Practices. AIM: To understand the importance of policy and legislation To identify & summarise Key legislation To examine policies.
AVERY FOWLER CREATIVE CREATION. LET’S TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW THE G.P.S FOR OUR UNIT SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats.
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
Community Sanctions in Croatia Neven Ricijaš, Ph.D. Department of Behavior Disorders Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Science University of Zagreb.
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
The Youth Criminal Justice System in Canada’s goal is rehabilitate and prevent youth from becoming adult offenders. The legislation attempts to balance.
Juvenile Justice Law in American Society Ms. Gikas.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
AGES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY The Youth Justice System.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
YCJA High School. Youth Criminal Justice Act Applies to all youth in Canada from the ages of 12 to 17.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Juvenile Justice YouTube - Children Given One Strike: A Lifetime Without Redemption (A Penn Law VLA Production) YouTube - Children Given One Strike: A.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Professor Kirsten Sandberg, Committee Member Juvenile justice and children’s rights: The position of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child.
The Youth Justice System. Youth Justice System For centuries, youths were treated the same as adults under the law. For centuries, youths were treated.
Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice
Child welfare.
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 &6 Juveniles and Juvenile Courts
Do now pg.59 1.What are all the steps in a criminal court case?
Learning Objectives Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process. Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase of the criminal.
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Youth Criminal Justice Act
Criminal Law and Young People
Presentation TOPIC: JUVENILE DELIQUENCY Group - 1
The Concept of Fundamental Justice
Juvenile Justice Introduction.
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Juvenile Justice in Malaysia
7Y Thursday MN Juvenile Justice System
Sports in Society: Issues & Controversies
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Chapter 12 Police Work with Juveniles
CJA 484 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CJA 484Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CJA 484 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
CJA 374 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE JUSTICE SYSTEM FAIR AND EQUITABLE FOR YOUTH?
Juvenile vs. Adult Justice
Youth Criminal Justice Act
Family group conference for child welfare & youth justice:
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch
What is our Youth Justice System Like?
The Youth Criminal Justice System
Juvenile Justice.
Chapter 10.
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
Chapter 4 © Routledge/Taylor & Francis 2014
endorsed by Simon Bailey, Chief Constable &
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003)
Navigating the Justice System
European Model for Restorative Justice with Children and Young People
12.1 – Criminal law & young people
Juvenile Law.
The Young and the Ruthless
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems An International Perspective on Juvenile Justice Chapter Nine Reichel

Question The universal nature of delinquency everywhere is “that young people seem to engage in similar kinds of behavior with strikingly similar demographic distributions.” What is the best way to respond to the “problem youth” of society? Welfare and protection of the juvenile, or Welfare and protection of society?

Similarities in Delinquency* Boys are more likely than girls to commit both property offenses and violent offenses. Peak ages are similar in most countries: 14-15 vandalism, 16-17 property crimes, 18-20 violent crimes. Parental supervision is a powerful predictor of delinquency in all the countries – the less supervision, the more delinquent behavior. * International Self-Report Delinquency Study in 12 countries (Junger-Tas, 1996).

Global Response to Juvenile Delinquency Response to crime by young people varies significantly by countries around the globe. Variation reflects the history and culture of its citizens. One consistent feature is the idea that young people should be responded to differently than adults.

Delinquency as a Worldwide Problem (Major Issues) Differing definitions of age that represent the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Differing definitions of age that represent the age that juvenile standards should apply. Variation in record keeping by countries. Differences in acts counted as offenses.

International Standards United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) Treaty based binding document: standards for national laws, procedures, and policies. Minimum standards for juvenile justice. Standards include: fair trial guarantees; procedural safeguards; promote rehabilitation and reintegration policies. Only broad statements and general guidelines outline the age of criminal responsibility or the age in which juvenile justice should apply – in other words, no specific age is referenced. Currently, the age of criminal responsibility ranges from 7 to 18 throughout the world.

Models of Juvenile Justice

Emphasis is on the child’s well-being. Welfare Model Emphasis is on the child’s well-being. Key personnel: child-care experts. Use of formal process: partial; prefers nonjudicial process. Prime objective: protection and well-being of the juvenile is emphasized, with treatment take priority over due process. Examples: Australia (police cautioning, family group conferencing, juvenile justice teams); New Zealand (restorative justice and family group conferencing).

Legalistic Model Emphasis is on applying the law over treating the juvenile. Stresses when and how the law is used if a juvenile is involved. Key personnel: lawyers Use of formal process: full Prime objective: due process and formal action take priority over treatment because the emphasis is on applying the law. Examples: Indonesia (no juvenile court structure); Italy (prescribed legal procedures with modifications for the accused’s age).

Corporatist Model A model that incorporates a range of sanctions to unite “just deserts” and restorative justice principles. Key personnel: administrators and bureaucrats Use of formal process: partial; prefers nonjudicial process. Prime objective: emphasis is on operating an effective juvenile justice system with increased efficiency and decreased delays. Example: England and Wales (order sanctions; youth offending teams and Youth Justice Board; government intervention and cooperation of various professional and interest groups).

Participatory Model Emphasis is on active participation by community agencies and citizens in an effort to contain the harmful behavior of young people. Key personnel: community members Use of formal process: scarce; prefers extralegal process. Prime objective: education of all citizens and the full integration of misbehaving youth into law-abiding society without any significant of formal legal intervention. Examples: Cuba (education and treatment as opposed to criminal law and the court system); China (education is the tool for young offenders – “help and cooperation teams,” labor is the device used by surveillance and rehabilitation centers to reform the older delinquents).

Questions What model best describes the juvenile system in the United States? Why? What part should parents play with regard to their misbehaving children? How has England responded to the parental challenge?