Communicating the Facts on the MERS Experience Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAS 19 vs. FAS158, 132R, 87, etc. versus. The scope is broad and includes wages, vacation or holiday pay, bonus, termination benefits, etc. as well as.
Advertisements

Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) Overview: Sweeping Changes for Defined Benefit Pension Plans Presented by David S. Boomershine, Senior Actuary Boomershine.
South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
THE PENSION LAUNCH PASBO Annual Conference March 18, 2011 Mr. Patrick Sable, PRSBA Chief Financial Officer Allegheny Intermediate Unit #3 Are You Communicating.
March 26, 2010 Althea A. Schwartz, FSA Consulting Actuary Milliman Inc. Managing DB Pension Plans in Stressful Times.
1 Chapter 29 Pension Plan Management. 2 Topics in Chapter Pension plan terminology Defined benefit versus defined contribution plans Pension fund investment.
Intermediate Financial Accounting Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.
Communicating the Facts on GASB 68
FA3 Lesson 7. Pension costs and obligations 1.Pensions 2.Defined contribution vs. defined benefit 3.Accounting for pensions 4.Pension worksheet.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting GASB Invitation to Comment The views expressed in this presentation are those of Mr. Bean. Official positions.
GASB 68 Employer Training Presenters: Shelley Johnson Foster & Foster System Actuary for LASERS and TRSL Artie Fillastre LASERS Chief Financial Officer.
FCERA April 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Paul Angelo,
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
Financial Statement Analysis K.R. Subramanyam Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the.
1 Your Tilted Balance Sheet – GASB 68 Overview Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc. September 12, 2013.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Report on State Actuarial Valuation Joint Hearing Assembly Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security Committee Senate Public Employment and Retirement.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota An Overview of GASB 68 for Cost-Sharing Plans Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
GASB 45 at SMCCCD District Committee on Budget and Finance October 3, 2006.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
LAO Public Retirement Benefits: Options for the Future Legislative Analyst’s Office
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
James Marta CPA, CGMA, ARPM Ken Hearnsberger, Finance Manager NBSIA Matt Nethaway, CPA 1.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM © 2016 CobaltCommunityResearch April 12 th, NCPERS Public Retirement Systems Study Webinar Supporting.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
1 Contributory Pension Scheme Members’ Meeting 26 February 2016.
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
20-1 An arrangement whereby an employer provides benefits (payments) to retired employees for services they provided in their working years. Pension Plan.
Communicating the Facts on the MERS Experience Study PRESENTED BY: [INSERT NAME]
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
1 Foregone revenue & lost savings $ Impact on TRA Foregone revenue from 1% ER contribution increase$43.0 million Permanent foregone savings if delay COLA.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
Council of the Great City Schools Defined Benefit Pensions
2016 NCPERS Public Retirement Systems Study Webinar
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
CalPERS Background 1,439 School Districts 1 State of California 1,581
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
Who is Actually Paying the Bill? By Brad Heinrichs, FSA, EA, MAAA
Chief Deputy County Executive
Pension Obligation Restructuring
TLFFRA Educational Conference
Financial Statement Analysis K.R. Subramanyam
Chapter 10: accruals and prepayment
California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
Other Post Employment Benefits
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Moving into the Future 60 Years of Retirement Security.
Actuarial Information / Valuations 101
California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
City of Houston Retired Employees Obligations
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
William B. Fornia, FSA April 11, 2019
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Insurance and Pension Fund Operations
THE PENSIONS BOARD Funding Issues and Current Trends in Pension Schemes Jerry Moriarty – Head of Investigations and Compliance 17 September 2004.
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
Presentation to the TLFFRA Educational Conference
CalPERS Update & Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Communicating the Facts on the MERS Experience Study Presented by: [Insert Name]

What is an Experience Study? The Experience Study takes place every five years The study reviews MERS’ funding policy for Defined Benefit plans and compares actual experience of our plan with current actuarial assumptions A comprehensive study of this kind is a fiscal best practice designed to ensure municipalities have enough assets in their plan to provide for the benefits that are expected to be paid

Experience Study Goals Goals of the Experience Study: Ensure municipalities can pay promised benefits to employees and that each plan is making reasonable progress to achieve full funding Encourage each generation to incur cost benefits for employees within that generation Create balanced and properly funded plans for employees

Key Changes as a Result of the Experience Study Three key changes that impact our plan: Mortality Rates Increasing Investment Rate of Return Assumption Decreasing Amortization Policy Update

Click here for a complete overview of the assumption changes. Summary of Changes Key Change More Information Mortality Rates Table Increasing Employees are living longer causing pensions to be paid longer and therefore costs will increase. Investment Rate of Return Assumption Decreasing Assumption rate is changing from 8% to 7.75% Amortization Policy Update The amortization period is the length of time needed to eliminate a pension plan’s unfunded liability. A fixed amortization period gives a specific target date to each plan by which all known obligations will be full funded. There will be a shorter fixed amortization period. This ensures that each generation incurs the cost of benefits for the employees who provide service within that generation, rather than deferring those costs to future generations. Click here for a complete overview of the assumption changes.

How will these changes affect our MERS Defined Benefit plan? [Here you can talk about how your municipality will be affected by the results of the Experience Study. Refer to the letter MERS provided you that included your specific impacts.] The MERS Retirement Board approved an optional “phase in” for the total impact over the next 5 years (impacting fiscal years 2017 – 2021), though MERS strongly encourages municipalities to pay the full impact right away.

How Will MERS Help? Recognizing that every municipality has unique needs, MERS offers a broad range of customizable plans to fit our budget, needs and goals. MERS will partner with us to help set fiscal goals and discuss our options to address our unfunded accrued liability. MERS is available to assist us in answering any questions with local media and the public The MERS team has been trained to explain the issues clearly They will work in partnership with us to deliver a consistent message across the state and to our local media