MULTI-BUNCH SIMULATIONS OF THE ILC FOR LUMINOSITY PERFORMANCE STUDIES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
1 MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS Glen White, SLAC/QMUL Snowmass 2005.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
ILC BDS Alignment and Tuning Studies Glen White SLAC/QMUL 8 November 2005 Progress report and ongoing plans for BDS alignment and tuning strategy.
Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !
January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Reconstruction of IP Beam Parameters at the ILC from Beamstrahlung Glen White SLAC/QMUL May 4 th 2005.
Web-Based ILC Multi-Bunch Simulation Database Glen White (SLAC / QMUL) ILC MDI Workshop SLAC, Jan 8th 2005.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
27-Nov-2007 SLAC-ILC- AP Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Lucretia Developments PT SLAC.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.
Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.
ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Status report of offset and angle studies with Guinea-Pig Status report of offset and angle studies.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
SLAC SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance Glen White SLAC March 27 th 2007.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Design of ATF2 feedback/feed-forward systems Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group LC-ABD meeting Birmingham, 17-18th.
BDS Alignment, Tuning, Feedback update and Integrated Simulation Plans Glen White.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
BDS, Start to End Simulation, Simulation Codes Summary D. Schulte.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status and plans Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University ATF2 commissioning.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
New algorithms for tuning the CLIC beam delivery system
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Transverse Beam Jitter Propagation in Multi-bunch Operation at ATF2
Other beam-induced background at the IP
Reconstruction of IP Beam Parameters at the ILC from Beamstrahlung
SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance
MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

MULTI-BUNCH SIMULATIONS OF THE ILC FOR LUMINOSITY PERFORMANCE STUDIES Glen White, QMUL/SLAC May 9th 2005

Multi-Bunch ILC Simulations Generate a representation of the ILC bunch train at a ‘snapshot’ in time to study the ILC machine Luminosity performance with ground motion and other error sources for different machine parameters. Track 600 bunches through Linac, BDS and IP to observe dynamics of fast feedback correction (IP position and angle) + Lumi feedback and determine estimate of train luminosity. Use PLACET for Linac simulation and MatMerlin for BDS (GUINEA-PIG used for IP collision). Model case of post-bba lattice (Linac) + 1 pulse of GM (Linac + BDS). TESLA TDR & ILC IR-1 (20mrad IP x-ing) BDS currently implemented. Typical simulation times 60 hours+ depending on simulation parameters (per seed). To gauge performance for a variety of parameters/simulation environments/machines need many CPU hours.

QMUL High-Throughput Cluster QMUL Test GRID cluster- http://194.36.10.1/cluster QMUL high-throughput cluster: GRID cluster development. Currently 348 CPUs (128 dual 2.8 GHz Intel Xeon nodes with 2 GB RAM and 32 dual 2.0 GHz AMD Athlon nodes with 1 GB RAM) . Total available storage of 40TB. 1 Gb internal networking and 1Gb bandwidth to London MAN. Will upgrade by 2007 to ~ 600CPUs and 100TB storage which will be mainly used for LHC computing needs. Boxes run Fedora2 Linux – have 100 Unix Matlab licenses.

Linac Simulation PLACET: Train enters linac with 20nm vertical emittance. Structure Misalignment: 0.5mm RMS y, 0.3mrad y’ error. Long- and short-range transverse and longitudinal wakefield functions included. BPM misalignment: 25um (y). Apply 1-1 steering algorithm. Pick a starting seed, for example cases, pick 2 seeds with final emittances ~ 23.5 nm. Apply y, y’ RMS Injection error. Apply RMS quad jitter in y. Generate 600 bunches (multiple random seeds). 100 post-bba Linac seeds Mean = 24.5 nm

Linac Simulation Electron beam at Linac exit. Long-range wakes have strong effect on bunch train. Need to perform steering on plateau not first bunch.

BDS/IP Simulation MATMERLIN: Random jitter on quads = 35nm RMS. Add 1.4ppm energy jitter on e- bunches (simulates passage of e-’s through undulator). Track 80,000 macro-particles per bunch. Feedback (Simulink model in Matlab): BPM error: 2mm (ANG FB) 5mm (IP FB) Kicker errors: 0.1% RMS bunch-bunch. IP (Guinea-Pig): Input macro-beam from MatMerlin BDS (non-gaussian). Calculates Lumi & Beam-Beam kick. Produces e+e- pairs -> track through solenoid field and count number hitting LCAL first layer for Lumi FB signal.

IP Fast Feedback System Detect beam-beam kick with BPM(s) either side of IP. Feed signal through digital feedback controller to fast strip-line kickers either side of IP. Digital PI control algorithm is used.

IP-Angle Feedback System Place kicker at point with relatively high b function and at IP phase. Can correct ~130 mrad at IP (>10sy’) with 3x1m kickers. BPM at phase 900 downstream from kicker. To cancel angular offset at IP to 0.1sy’ level (TESLA TDR BDS): BPM 2 : required resolution ~ 2mm, FB latency ~ 10 bunches. For ILC-IR1 optics, FB latency is 4 bunches with similar BPM resolution requirements.

Banana Bunches Short-range wakefields acting back on bunches cause systematic shape distortions: Z-Y plane of a sample bunch: Only small increase in vertical emittance, but large loss in luminosity performance with head-on collisions due to strong, non-linear beam-beam interaction. Change in beam-beam dynamics from Gaussian bunches.

Banana-Bunch Dynamics Luminosity of a sample bunch over range of position and angle offsets. Feedback strategy: wait for IP and ANG FB systems to ‘zero’ (coloured ellipse in figure)– then fine tune by stepping in y then y’ using LUMI monitor (count e+e- hits in first layer of BeamCal) to find optimum collision conditions.

TESLA TDR Run (Linac) 1 σ RMS injection y,y’ error into Linac (flat train). 100 nm RMS y quad jitter. Use Placet lattices with ~ 25% emittance growth (~ 23.5 nm at exit) Emittances shown below are for the final bunch in the train after ground motion and beam offsets (at the end of the Linac section). e- Mean: 23.5 nm e+ Mean: 23.7 nm

TESLA TDR Run (BDS) IP vertical emittances after tracking through BDS: Mean: 32.9 nm Mean: 28.0 nm

IP Feedback 5 Bunch e+e- Int. Signal Single example seed shown. Corrects < 10 bunches. Corrects to finite Dy due to banana bunch effect. Vertical Beam-Beam scan @ bunch 150.

Angle Feedback Single example seed shown. Angle scan after 250 bunches when position scan complete. Noisy for first ~100 bunches (HOM’s). FB corrects to <0.1 sy’

Luminosity Luminosity through example seed bunch train showing effects of position/angle scans. Total luminosity estimate: L(1-600) + L(550-600)*(2820-600)/50

Luminosity – All Seeds (TESLA TDR Example)

Effect of Lumi-Scan After position scan After position and angle scan Effect of Pos & Ang Lumi scans compared with start of pulse with FB only. Angle feedback gives some improvement

ILC IR-1 (20mrad xing angle) BDS Results Same Linac setup and noise figures as with TESLA TDR model. IP vertical emittances: e+ Mean: 26.3 nm e- Mean: 26.7 nm

ILC IR-1 (20mrad xing angle) BDS Results Luminosity:

ILC IR-1 (20mrad xing angle) BDS Results Effect of luminosity feedback:

ILC Simulation Web Page Store all beam data from simulation runs online http://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/lcdata

Summary and Plans Facility for parallel processing of accelerator codes set-up. Used to test TESLA performance with Fast-Feedback. Need to understand lumi performance & optimise. Cross-checks with other codes (MatLiar, Lucretia). Add Crab Cavities: Study crossing angle stability (requires addition of x-feedback) Study possibility of using vertical cavity for Angle FB. New lattices + Beam Parameters (@500 & 1000 GeV). Add Collimator Wakes. Include Beamstrahlung monitoring code. Integrate with slow Linac+BDS feedback. Include crossing angle in GP? New MatMerlin version now available, based on Merlin3

MatMerlin Upgrades There is now a manual- will be released as a EUROTeV Memo. Ability to apply transverse and longitudinal short-range wakefields to any element. Crab cavity support (through LCAV element). Synchrotron radiation support. Can now index and track sub-beamlines. Improvements to MAD component support. Tested under Linux and Windows. MatMerlin now under CVS control at DESY. See Codes Database: http://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~white/accodes -> soon moving to a site based at: http://projects.astec.ac.uk/Plone Also now have A.S.’s Fortran Ground Motion code compiled as a Matlab mex function to enable proper GM support in Models.