Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Ada Ndoja, Robert E. Cohen, Tingting Yao  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Dynamic Control of Yeast MAP Kinase Network by Induced Association and Dissociation between the Ste50 Scaffold and the Opy2 Membrane Anchor  Katsuyoshi.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Ali Zarrinpar, Roby P Bhattacharyya, M.Paige Nittler, Wendell A Lim 
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
CoREST Represses the Heat Shock Response Mediated by HSF1
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages S (December 1998)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (May 1998)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e3 (September 2017)
The Putative RNA Helicase Dbp4p Is Required for Release of the U14 snoRNA from Preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Martin Koš, David Tollervey 
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Volume 117, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
DEP-Domain-Mediated Regulation of GPCR Signaling Responses
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (February 1998)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (June 2000)
Specificity of MAP Kinase Signaling in Yeast Differentiation Involves Transient versus Sustained MAPK Activation  Walid Sabbagh, Laura J Flatauer, A.Jane.
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Genetic and Epigenetic Strategies Potentiate Gal4 Activation to Enhance Fitness in Recently Diverged Yeast Species  Varun Sood, Jason H. Brickner  Current.
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Nancy L. Maas, Kyle M. Miller, Lisa G. DeFazio, David P. Toczyski 
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Selective Recruitment of TAFs by Yeast Upstream Activating Sequences
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 517-524 (August 2003) The Yeast G Protein α Subunit Gpa1 Transmits a Signal through an RNA Binding Effector Protein Scp160  Ming Guo, Christopher Aston, Scott A Burchett, Christine Dyke, Stanley Fields, S.Johannes R Rajarao, Peter Uetz, Yuqi Wang, Kathleen Young, Henrik G Dohlman  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 517-524 (August 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00307-1

Figure 1 A Positive Signaling Role for Gpa1 (A) Wild-type cells were transformed with plasmid pG1501 (pGAL) containing no insert, GPA1, GPA1Q323L, or GPA1R297H, then grown in the presence of galactose for 6 hr to induce Gpa1 expression, and treated with the indicated concentration of α factor pheromone for 90 min. β-galactosidase activity was determined spectrofluorometrically using a pheromone-responsive FUS1 promoter-lacZ reporter (plasmid pRS423-FUS1-lacZ). (B) The growth inhibition plate assay was performed on the same cells, using 5, 15, 45, or 60 μg α factor for 48 hr. (C) Wild-type cells were transformed with plasmid pAD4M containing no insert, GPA1Q323L, or GPA1 (not shown) and grown to mid-log phase. (D) Mating efficiency was determined for the same cells. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate (β-galactosidase assay, mating assay) or duplicate (halo assay). Error bars, ±SEM. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00307-1)

Figure 2 Gpa1 and Ste4/Ste18 Converge on a Common Signaling Pathway (A and B) Plasmid pAD4M containing GPA1Q323L (pADH-GPA1QL) or no insert (pADH) was transformed into wild-type and mutant strains, as indicated. The reporter transcription assay was performed as described in the legend to Figure 1, except that the cells were grown in the presence of dextrose. (C) Wild-type cells were transformed with plasmid pAD4M containing no insert (vector) or GPA1Q323L. Biotin-labeled cRNA was hybridized to an Affymetrix GeneChip. Data are from values generated by averaging three replicate chips per strain. Comparisons are Gpa1Q323L versus vector (hatched bars, left axis) or vector plus pheromone versus no pheromone (black bars, right axis). Shown are genes induced by >3-fold after 2.5 nM α factor (20 total) that are also induced by Gpa1Q323L. (D) Reporter transcription activity was measured in wild-type cells transformed with plasmid pAD4M containing no insert or GPA1Q323L, and plasmid pRS316-GAL containing STE4 (pGAL-STE4) or no insert (pGAL). (E) Reporter transcription activity was measured in a gpa1Δ ste7Δ mutant strain transformed with plasmid pAD4M containing no insert, GPA1, or GPA1Q323L, and plasmid pYES containing STE7 and the GAL1 promoter. Cells were grown in dextrose and then shifted to galactose to induce STE7 (as indicated) for 6 hr. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00307-1)

Figure 3 Gpa1 Signaling Is Blocked by scp160Δ Plasmid pAD4M containing GPA1, GPA1Q323L, or no insert (pADH) was transformed into wild-type (WT) and scp160Δ cells. The reporter transcription assay was performed as described in Figure 1. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00307-1)

Figure 4 Scp160 Binds to the Active State of Gpa1 Cells expressing Scp160-Myc (in plasmid pYES) and either Gpa1-GST or GST alone (plasmid pAD4M) were grown to mid-log phase and then lysed in the presence of GDP, GDP+AlF4−, or GTPγS as indicated. Detergent-solubilized lysates were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose, washed, and eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Retained protein (Bound) was detected by immunoblotting with antibodies against (B) GST, (D) Myc, and (F) Ste4. Samples of the soluble cell lysate (Applied) were similarly probed with antibodies against (A) GST, (C) Myc, and (E) Ste4 to confirm equivalent levels of protein expression. Arrows indicate the protein specifically recognized by the antibody. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 517-524DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00307-1)