A reinforced sternal wiring technique for transverse thoracosternotomy closure in bilateral lung transplantation: From biomechanical test to clinical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Advertisements

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
The eighth edition TNM stage classification for lung cancer: What does it mean on main street?  Frank C. Detterbeck, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Double crisscross sternal wiring and chest wound infections: A prospective randomized study  Tomaso Bottio, MD, Giulio Rizzoli, MD, Vladimiro Vida, MD,
Yesterday's heroic measure is now standard procedure: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplant  Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD 
Carbon dioxide insufflation in open-chamber cardiac surgery: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of neurocognitive effects  Krish Chaudhuri, MBBS,
Ground glass opacity of the lung: The veil that needs lifting
Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration
Extended pericardiotomy avoids cardiopulmonary bypass during bilateral sequential lung transplantation  Takahiro Oto, MD, Marc Rabinov, FRACS, Franklin.
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Abracadabra I, II…HeartMate 3?
Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD 
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Marye J. Gleva, MD, Charles B. Huddleston, MD 
Evaluation and operative technique to repair isolated sternal fractures  J. Ernesto Molina, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Influence of sternal size and inadvertent paramedian sternotomy on stability of the closure site: A clinical and mechanical study  J. Zeitani, MD, PhD,
Igor E. Konstantinov, MD, PhD, FRACS 
Aldo R. Castañeda, MD, PhD: Recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award and 74th president of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery  Pedro J.
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Aditya K. Kaza, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Successful recovery from respiratory failure by external distraction sternoplasty in a patient with Jeune syndrome  Samina Park, MD, Chang Hyun Kang,
Support Your Specialty
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Fixing the supply problem
Bartley P. Griffith, MD, FACS, FRCS 
Military surgeons just want to have fun
A first start for lung transplantation?
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation after Lung Transplantation: Evolving Technique Improves Outcomes  Takahiho Oto, MD, Franklin Rosenfeldt, MD, FRACS,
Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Living without lungs? Bilateral pneumonectomy and dual circulatory support: A step forward in the search for a total artificial lung  Christian A. Bermudez,
Instrumental variable methods in clinical research
A fate worse than death  Jennifer S. Lawton, MD 
Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery
Marc Licker, MD, John Diaper, RA 
Uma M. Sachdeva, MD, PhD, Daniela Molena, MD 
Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications  Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Using bilateral internal thoracic arteries—just do it
Functional tricuspid pathology: To treat or not to treat
The harder one looks, the more one finds
Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting reduces chest wall dysesthesia after coronary bypass surgery  Phuong L. Markman, MBBS, BMedSci (Hons),
The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956  Richard A. DeWall, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Bryan M. Burt, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Jeffrey H. Shuhaiber, MD, Jeff Moore, MS, David B. Dyke, MD 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Keep it short and sweet  Ian A. Makey, MD, Scott B. Johnson, MD 
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
Ralph E. Delius, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Why arch curvature affects arch resistance
Aritoshi Hattori, MD, Kenji Suzuki, MD 
Lung cancer randomized controlled trials should compare stereotactic body radiation therapy with observation, NOT surgery  Raja M. Flores, MD  The Journal.
Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind
The evolution of cardiothoracic critical care
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Samuel Kim, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
How do we follow up our patients
Carl L. Backer, MD, Bradley S. Marino, MD, MPP, MSCE 
Journal changes and initiatives
Commentary: Evaluation of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation—It is time to teach an old dog new tricks!  W. Hampton Gray, MD, P. Michael.
Akiko Tanaka, MD, PhD, Takeyoshi Ota, MD, PhD 
Zipping up after a median sternotomy: Are we at the end of the wire?
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

A reinforced sternal wiring technique for transverse thoracosternotomy closure in bilateral lung transplantation: From biomechanical test to clinical application  Takahiro Oto, MD, PhD, Ramkumar Venkatachalam, Yos S. Morsi, PhD, Silvana Marasco, MS, FRACS, Adrian Pick, FRACS, Marc Rabinov, PhD, FRACS, Franklin Rosenfeldt, MD, FRACS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages 218-224 (July 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003 Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The new reinforced wiring technique. Two peristernal stainless-steel wires are placed on the each side of the sternum at the level of the third and fifth intercostal spaces inside the conventional 2 longitudinal wires, which cross the sternotomy line. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 134, 218-224DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The appearance of the bone models before and after destructive testing. The parasternal wires in the reinforced wiring group prevented the longitudinal wires from cutting through the bone until the material itself parted. In contrast, failure of fixation in the conventional wiring group occurred because of the wires cutting through the bone. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 134, 218-224DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Three biomechanical variables, including yield loading (in newtons), maximum loading (in newtons), and postyield stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), were used in this analysis. The yield load was defined as the point on the load-displacement curve at which the curve became nonlinear at the initiation of the wire cutting through the bone. The maximum load was the ultimate strength of the construct. The postyield stiffness was the slope of the load-displacement curve over a 2-mm displacement beyond the yield point. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 134, 218-224DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Load-displacement curve of biomechanical testing. A, Longitudinal distraction. In the reinforced wiring group yield load (P = .03), maximum load (P = .03), and postyield stiffness (P = .04) were significantly greater than in the conventional wiring group. B, Anterior–posterior shear. Yield load (P = .03) and postyield stiffness (P = .04) in the reinforced wiring group were significantly greater than in the conventional wiring group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2007 134, 218-224DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.003) Copyright © 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions