The extra-tropical UTLS in chemistry-climate models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C. Michael Volk + the HAGAR Team With contributions by S. Viciani, A. Ulanovsky, F. Ravegnani, P. Konopka G-SPARC Workshop, Berlin, 4 December 2006 Transport.
Advertisements

Requirements for monitoring the global tropopause Bill Randel Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Understanding climate model biases in Southern Hemisphere mid-latitude variability Isla Simpson 1 Ted Shepherd 2, Peter Hitchcock 3, John Scinocca 4 (1)
Another hint for a changing stratospheric circulation after 2001 Harald Bönisch (1), Andreas Engel (1), Thomas Birner (2), Peter Hoor (3) (1)Institute.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Assimilation of TES O 3 data in GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones, Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto Kevin Bowman Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Using global models and chemical observations to diagnose eddy diffusion.
Seasonal Variations in the Mixing Layer in the UTLS Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto GEOS-Chem Meeting April 2009.
Transport of CO and O 3 into the UTLS Region Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto.
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.Review of stratospheric chemistry 2.Recent trends in stratospheric ozone and forcing 3.How will stratospheric.
Lessons 22,23,24 Upper Level Winds
Experiments with WACCM: A sensitivity study. OUTLINE Why is a parameterization of gravity waves important? Middle atmosphere (stratosphere + mesosphere)
Assimilation of EOS-Aura Data in GEOS-5: Evaluation of ozone in the Upper Troposphere - Lower Stratosphere K. Wargan, S. Pawson, M. Olsen, J. Witte, A.
Variability of Tropical to Extra-tropical Transport in the Lower Stratosphere Mark Olsen UMBC/GSFC Anne Douglass, Paul Newman, and Eric Nash.
Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and CCMs Mark Weber 1, Ingo Wohltmann 2, Veronika Eyring 3, Markus Rex 2,
Sensitivity of Methane Lifetime to Sulfate Geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Giovanni Pitari V. Aquila,
© Crown copyright Met Office The Brewer-Dobson circulation in the CMIP5 simulations Steven Hardiman and Neal Butchart (Met Office Hadley Centre) Natalia.
Using GPS data to study the tropical tropopause Bill Randel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado “You can observe a lot by just watching”
Temperature trends in the upper troposphere/ lower stratosphere as revealed by CCMs and AOGCMs Eugene Cordero, Sium Tesfai Department of Meteorology San.
MIR OZONE ISSUES Horizontal (STE) and vertical transport (long life time in UTLS) Photochemical production by precursors (biomass burning, lightning,..)
Vertical Structure of the Tropical Troposphere (including the TTL) Ian Folkins Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science Dalhousie University.
Lesson 01 Atmospheric Structure n Composition, Extent & Vertical Division.
Chemistry Climate Modeling of the UTLS An update on model inter-comparison and evaluation with observations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR & CCMVal Collaborators.
Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.
Past and Future Changes in Southern Hemisphere Tropospheric Circulation and the Impact of Stratospheric Chemistry-Climate Coupling Collaborators: Steven.
The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:
Figure (a-c). Latitude-height distribution of monthly mean ozone flux for the months of (a) January, (b) April and (c) July averaged over years 2000 to.
Stratosphere and Troposphere Exchange (STE) Above the Tibetan Plateau Wenshou Tian, Min Zhang, Hongying Tian Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China Martyn.
Cargese UTLS ozone and ozone trends 1 UTLS ozone and ozone trends D. Fonteyn (My apologies) Given by W. Lahoz (My thanks)
UTLS Transport & STE Summary “Finding Nemo” Gettelman, Neu, Mullendore.
The Extratropical UTLS: Observations, Concepts and Future Directions.
First global view of the Extratropical Tropopause Transition Layer (ExTL) from the ACE-FTS Michaela I. Hegglin, University of Toronto, CA Chris Boone,
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
Dynamical balances and tropical stratospheric upwelling Bill Randel and Rolando Garcia NCAR Thanks to: Qiang Fu, Andrew Gettelman, Rei Ueyama, Mike Wallace,
Structure and Chemical Composition of the Extratropical UTLS Issues, Progresses, and Challenges (with a focus on airborne research) Peter Hoor and Laura.
UTLS Chemical Structure, ExTL Summary of the talks –Data sets –Coordinates –Thickness of the ExTL (tracers based) Outstanding questions Discussion.
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 Characterizing the Seasonal Variation in Position.
What is the extratropical tropopause and how might it change in the future? Peter Haynes, University of Cambridge. Introduction Simple models for the extratropical.
Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and coupled chemistry climate models Mark Weber 1, Sandip Dhomse 1, Ingo.
Weather & Climate. Definitions  Weather – day to day changes in the state of the atmosphere.  Climate – average weather conditions over a longer period.
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
SCSL SWAP/LYRA workshop
Amanda Maycock & Piers Forster
Daily Tropospheric Ozone Residual from OMI-MLS
CCSM Working Group Meeting, February 2008
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Static Stability in the Global UTLS Observations of Long-term Mean Structure and Variability using GPS Radio Occultation Data Kevin M. Grise David W.
University Allied Workshop (1-3 July, 2008)
A New Tropopause Definition for Use in Chemistry-Transport Models
Stratosphere Issues in the CFSR
Seasonal Differences of UTLS Exchange Processes between Spring and Summer in the Subtropics and Polar Region Simone Tilmes, Laura Pan, Louisa Emmons, Hans.
Kris Wargan & Natalya A. Kramarova(*)
Impact of the vertical resolution on Climate Simulation using CESM
Double tropopauses during idealized baroclinic life cycles
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
Interannual Variations in Stratospheric Water Vapor
Earth’s Atmosphere.
ATMOSPHERE OBJECTIVE 1 1.What are the structural components of the
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Shiliang Wu1 Loretta J. Mickley1, Daniel J
NRT Tropospheric and UTLS Ozone From OMI/MLS
ExUTLS dynamics and global observations
UTLS Workshop Session 1, Monday AM: UTLS Dynamical Structure, Tropopause (Haynes, Manney, Pan) Theme: Tropopause Structure, Focus on Tropopause Inversion.
Simulations of the transport of idealized short-lived tracers
Climatic implications of changes in O3
Presentation transcript:

The extra-tropical UTLS in chemistry-climate models CCMVal overview: The extra-tropical UTLS in chemistry-climate models Michaela I. Hegglin & Andrew Gettelman Seok-Woo Son, Masatomo Fujiwara, Simone Tilmes, Laura Pan, Peter Hoor, Huikyo Lee, Gloria Manney, Thomas Birner, Gabriele Stiller, Markus Rex, Stefanie Kremser, Don Wuebbles

Chemistry Climate Model Validation (CCMVal) Present a multi-model comparison of coupled chemistry-climate models (CCMs) in the UTLS using process-oriented diagnostics. Comparison is part of a report on CCMs by the CCMVal (Chemistry-Climate Model Validation) SPARC project and will be used for the WMO ozone assessment. The different diagnostics test the representation of dynamics, chemistry, transport, radiation, and microphysics and are derived from robust relations seen in observations. 17 international models are participating in this round of CCMVal(-2). CCMVal-2 included for the first time the comprehensive validation of CCM performance in the UTLS. Major efforts were needed in order to find and process suitable observations for comparison, establish robust diagnostics for the CCMs (which operate in a free-running mode and are multi-dimensional), turn the diagnostic into a quantitative grade. Given the rather sparse observational data base, process-oriented diagnostics in the UTLS are difficult to determine, so mostly seasonal cycles observed in chemical or dynamical variables are used to test the models’ performance.

The global UTLS

Well, we want to know where we come from, no? Tropical diagnostics Well, we want to know where we come from, no? x x x

Seasonal cycle in the CPT The cold point temperature (CPT) determines the entry value of stratospheric water vapour. The amplitude of the seasonal cycle is generally well reproduced. The models exhibit a relatively wide range in the mean value. (Note that due to the non-linearity of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation regulating H2O saturation mixing ratios, the annual cycle is more important than the mean.)

Seasonal cycle in H2O @ 80 hPa In conjunction with the cold point temperature, the water vapor concentration above the CPT is the dominant term in the total hydrogen budget of the stratosphere. More difficulties are seen in reproducing the H2O seasonal cycle. Model means, phase, and amplitude of the seasonal cycle exhibit a wide range.

Seasonal cycle in O3 @ 100 hPa O3 is important radiatively, and thus important for getting the thermal structure correct. O3 is influenced by both transport and chemistry (e.g. lightning NOx). The diagnostic is generally well reproduced. Many models have less NH summertime tropical ozone than observations. Some models exhibit the wrong annual cycle, and one shows an excessive amplitude during summer.

Extra-tropical diagnostics

Zonal mean zonal wind @ 200 hPa Used to test the models’ realism in representing the meridional gradients of the thermal structure. Most models perform very well. The Taylor diagram yields a statistical summary of the model performance in terms of correlation and amplitude.

The tropopause inversion layer The tropopause inversion layer (TIL) is a distinctive feature of the thermal structure just above the tropopause, which reflects the balance between radiative and dynamical processes. GPS GPS: Model Resolution (top) COSMIC GPS RO data (middle) COSMIC GPS RO data using only CCMVal-2 standard pressure levels (bottom) composite of 9 REF-B1 model integrations. Zonally-averaged N2 as a function of latitudes and log-p height in tropopause based coordinates (Contour intervals are 0.5x10-4 s-1, and values ≥ 5.5x10-4 s-1 are shaded.) Model Composite

Multi-model comparison of individual N2 vertical profiles: The maxima in modeled N2 are comparable to or larger than those derived from degraded, but weaker than those computed from full-level GPS data. The location of maximum N2 in the CCMVal-2 models is always higher. We need to better understand how features depend on the resolution of both models and observations and how this can bias the evaluations.

The mass of the lowermost stratosphere The LMS mass can be seen as an integrated measure for the extra-tropical tropopause and therefore tests the basic dynamical state of the atmosphere.

Total grade for the LMS mass: The total grade includes the skill obtained from the Taylor diagram plus the assessment of the mean. We use mean=1 - 1/ng * | μmod - μobs | / σobs In the NH, most models exhibit a high skill, i.e. realistic amplitude and phase of the seasonal cycle. There are, however, major discrepancies in the model means. Overall scores are generally higher in the NH than in the SH.

Seasonal cycles in tracers @ 100 hPa NH Test of the models’ representation of the relative strength in quasi-horizontal, meridional mixing between the tropics and the extra-tropics and the transport of aged stratospheric air through the large-scale Brewer-Dobson circulation.

Seasonal cycles in tracers @ 200 hPa NH The shift to lower amplitudes at this lower level in the UTLS indicates too much mixing across the subtropical jet region.

CO vertical profiles in dθ/dz_tp Validates the strength of tropospheric influence on the lowermost stratospheric background composition. The tropospheric fraction of CO* is determined by CO* = (CO-COstrat)/(COtrop-COstrat). We are interested in both, the background value at higher altitudes, as well as the gradient across the tropopause. The models perform well given their rather low vertical and horizontal resolution, except for the models with semi-Lagrangian transport schemes.

ExTL width and center This diagnostic is used to validate the mixing and transport characteristics of the models in the tropopause region. Generally very poor performance in this metric, which might be at least partly attributable to the limited vertical resolution of the models. Recent satellite observations from the ACE-FTS, which have a resolution closer to the CCMs (around 1 km), show indeed a behaviour similar to some models.

GLOBAL UTLS METRICS TABLE Despite the relatively low resolution of the models, they represent the UTLS dynamical and chemical features surprisingly well.

Trends in tropopause pressure REF-B1 Simulations show good historical fidelity with observed tropical tropopause pressure trends, and projected decreases in tropical tropopause pressure in the 21st century. REF-B2 SH NH

Trends in tropopause pressure Future Trends are different between hemispheres due to the effects of ozone depletion and recovery in the SH.

Trends in UTLS O3 and H2O In the tropical LS, O3 trends are negative in conventional, but positive in tropopause (tp) coordinates. In the extra-tropics, substantial O3 increases are seen at and above the tp. H2O exhibits strong positive changes in the UT. Changes in the LMS are in part caused by the upward tropopause trend, and therefore more moderate in TP coordinates. in tropopause-based coordinates the strong positive trend in H2O is largely confined to the upper troposphere whereas stratospheric H2O shows moderate changes of around 2% dec-1 throughout the global lower stratosphere.

SUMMARY A wide range of tropical LS H2O values were found. This is likely due to the tropical tropopause pressure and CPT which exhibit significant biases between models, although the seasonal cycles are generally reasonable. LMS mass (which is an indicator of the extra-tropical tropopause pressure) shows a wide range of skill. The performance is generally better in the NH than in the SH. Comparison with other reanalyses is needed in order to gain confidence in the observational reference of the SH. The seasonal cycle of O3 in both the tropics and the extra-tropics is for most models quite good, though a few models do perform very poorly. The skill in representing the seasonal cycle in H2O is rather bad: The reasons for this finding at the 100 hPa level are not so clear, but at 200 hPa it seems to arise from too much tropospheric influence. (H2O is more sensitive to tropospheric in-mixing than O3). The structure of tracer gradients across the extra-tropical tropopause, both vertical and meridional, is perhaps surprisingly good given the comparatively low horizontal resolution of most CCMs. The outliers tend to be models which use a semi-Lagrangian transport scheme.

ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS The UTLS is still relatively sparsely sampled by observations. This unfortunately limits confidence in the quantitative evaluation of model performance in the UTLS. New observations are needed especially for O3 and H2O with a vertical resolution better than 1 km and a horizontal resolution better than 100 km, especially in the SH and the tropics. In this round of CCMVal, our main focus was on evaluating the representation of dynamics, and transport and mixing in the UTLS. However, testing chemistry should be part of future model validation efforts, including tropospheric CCMs used for the IPCC. Future model development is needed that brings together tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry climate models. CCMVal data will become available for the wider community early next year. (Respect data policy!) A diagnostic-package using NCL is available for easier comparison between model fields and observations. (Talk to Andrew Gettelman for more info)