Parsimony in Protein Conformational Change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Additivity in Both Thermodynamic Stability and Thermal Transition Temperature for Rubredoxin Chimeras via Hybrid Native Partitioning  David M. LeMaster,
Sampath Koppole, Jeremy C. Smith, Stefan Fischer  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Mechanism of a Molecular Valve in the Halorhodopsin Chloride Pump
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
SH3-SH2 Domain Orientation in Src Kinases
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Damped-Dynamics Flexible Fitting
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Multiple Conformations of F-actin
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Omar Davulcu, Peter F. Flynn, Michael S. Chapman, Jack J. Skalicky 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The Dynamic Basis for Signal Propagation in Human Pin1-WW
Molding Atomic Structures into Intermediate- Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps of Ribosomal Complexes Using Real-Space Refinement  Haixiao Gao, Joachim.
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Annia Rodríguez-Hernández, John J. Perona  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Parsimony in Protein Conformational Change Brynmor K. Chapman, Omar Davulcu, Jack J. Skalicky, Rafael P. Brüschweiler, Michael S. Chapman  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1190-1198 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of Superposition through Optimization of Parsimonious Dihedral Angle Changes Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Flexible Superposition of AK TSA on the Substrate-Free Form Two rounds of selection eliminated the 75% least consequential dihedrals. Refinement continued for 200 cycles with an ℓ1-norm λ = 5. (A) Changes in pseudo-torsion angles. Annotation includes dynamic domain designation (Hayward and Lee, 2002; Niu et al., 2011); observation of NMR relaxation exchange (Rex, wide arrows) in the substrate-free (Davulcu et al., 2009) or -bound (this work) states; and NMR chemical shift perturbation (Δδ, thin arrows) between substrate-free and -bound forms, excluding residues close to substrates. (B) Starting from the AK TSA structure (orange), the parsimoniously superposed model (color- and thickness-coded by magnitude of pseudo-dihedral rotation, blue to red) is now well fit to the substrate-free form (green). Transition state analogs are shown as a stick model. Side chains are shown for residues with backbone nitrogen Rex to highlight proximity to changing dihedrals. (See also Figure S5) (C) The TSA and superposed structures are rotated 90° to highlight flexing of the β sheet. Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Superposition of the Substrate-Free TIM on the Complex with an Intermediate Analog, Using λ = 0.3, Reduces the RMSD from 1.1 to 0.48 Å The parsimoniously superposed model is color- and thickness-coded as in Figure 2. NMR Rex observations (arrows) are concentrated in the loop or at proximal sites (213, 221) directly affected by the conformational change of the loop. Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Superposition of Substrate-Free Bovine RNase A on a Dinucleotide Complex (A) Consistency of dihedral changes with NMR Rex (arrows), after optimization with λ = 1. (B) The superposed model (color-coded by dihedral change) fits the complex (orange) with an RMSD of 0.44 Å. Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Flexibly Superimposed DHFR Structures Starting from the closed E. coli DHFR structure (orange), parsimonious superposition (color-coded by dihedral change) is fit to the occluded form (green). Optimized using λ = 1.0 (graph and full molecule), the RMSD is 0.85 Å. With λ = 0.3 (inset), RMSD drops to 0.74 Å through increased latitude to fit the local configuration of loop M20. Rex (arrows) is shown for three complexes, both occluded and closed (Osborne et al., 2001). Rex in the FG and GH loops, near residues 120 and 148, respectively, are thought to reflect changing interactions with the M20 loop (Osborne et al., 2001) due to motions of the loop and rotation of dihedrals near helix B (i.e. long-range effects), while those near residue 45 might reflect transient cofactor dissociation (Osborne et al., 2001), so the absence of large dihedral changes in these regions is not unexpected. Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Superimposition of the Substrate-Free Aquifex aeolicus AdK on a Bisubstrate Analog Complex (A) The parsimony-restrained dihedral changes (λ = 1.0) are compared with NMR Rex (arrows) and domain designations. (B) The superposed structure (colored by dihedral change) has converged upon the substrate complex (green) from the substrate-free starting structure (orange). The inset is colored according to the raw pseudo-dihedral differences between the substrate-free and -bound structures (not parsimoniously refined), from which it is unclear where the hinges are. Structure 2015 23, 1190-1198DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions