Severe Accident Modeling and 3D Graphic Visualization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

OVERVIEW - RELAP/SCDAPSIM
Crashworthiness and High Strain Rate Material Testing Test Development for Vehicle Crash Conditions Motivation: The current vehicle design approaches result.
Nuclear Energy University Programs NGNP Systems Analysis August 10, 2011 Hans Gougar.
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
Basic Principles of Operation of nuclear power plants Special Topic 2014 Exam Craft mock 2014.
Institute for Electric Power Research Co. International Workshop On Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management Cologne, Germany 29.
TRAINING AND OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE SYSTEM (TOPS)
© 2010 Invensys. All Rights Reserved. The names, logos, and taglines identifying the products and services of Invensys are proprietary marks of Invensys.
Nuclear Power Station Lecture No 5. A generating station in which nuclear energy is converted into electrical energy is known as a Nuclear power station.
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
ANALYSIS AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES OF EXERCISE 1 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TT BENCHMARK 2002 ANS Winter Meeting Bedirhan Akdeniz and Kostadin Ivanov Pennsylvania.
March “Experience Gained from the Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Authority in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level 2 Development for Laguna.
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
CANDU Owners Group Inc. “Strength Through Co-operation” 1 COG R&D Program Overview Presented to CNC IAPWS Workshop I Hey Program Manager May 2009 PROTECTED.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Assessment of Margin for In-Vessel Retention in Higher Power Reactors 2004 RELAP5 International.
Generation Aino Ahonen CABABILITY OF APROS IN THE ANALYSES OF DIESEL LOADING SEQUENCES E. Raiko, H.Kontio, K.Porkholm, presented by A. Ahonen.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
18 September Licensing for Next Generation Signalling Buddhadev Dutta Chowdhury 27 th April 2012.
1 Advanced Virtual Energy Simulation Training And Research (AVESTAR TM ) Center Stephen E. Zitney, Ph.D. CACHE Trustees Meeting Nashville, TN June 2-3,
1 © 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.Westinghouse Proprietary Class 3 The Incorporation of the Utilities Input into the Design.
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
Pavel Slavík, Marek Gayer, Frantisek Hrdlicka, Ondrej Kubelka Czech Technical University in Prague Czech Republic 2003 Winter Simulation Conference December.
Nuclear Power Generation In The United States. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
Program ingineer: Kovtunov Vasily Simulators of facilities and systems for Leningrad NPP personnel training.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 MELCOR Severe Accident Simulation for a “CAREM-like” Integral Reactor M. Caputo, J. M. García, M. Giménez, S.
Natural Convection as a Passive Safety Design in Nuclear Reactors
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 In-vessel retention as retrofitting measure for existing nuclear power plants M. Bauer, Westinghouse Electric.
I & C.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 OECD Benchmark Exercise on the TMI-2 Plant: Analysis of an Alternative Severe Accident Scenario G. Bandini (ENEA),
ENGINEERING SIMULATOR A-D TECHNOLOGY K. W. WONG November 2009.
Nuclear Research Proposal for EURATOM/HORIZON2020 call Karel Katovsky, PhD. Nuclear Power Research Group Department of Electrical Power Engineering Faculty.
L I NGAYA'S INSTT. OF MGT. AND TECHNOLOGY, FBD. THERMAL POWER PLANT OVERVIEW.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making “Overview of Level 2 PSA” Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
Overview of MSU ESRDC Activities related to Computational Tools for Early State Design Dr. Noel Schulz Associate Professor and TVA Endowed Professorship.
CONTROL AND SAFETY of Nuclear Steam Supply Systems (NSSS)
NuScale Generator A Practical Energy Alternative for the Future
Algirdas Kaliatka, Audrius Grazevicius, Eugenijus Uspuras
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VI Deterministic safety assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
Power Plants Types of Power Plants
Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation
Ch. 17 Review Game Nonrenewable Energy.
Current Generation Hypervisor Type 1 Type 2.
ROCKET TESTING TYPES OF TESTS
How SCADA Systems Work?.
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
RELAP/SCDAP Sensitivity Study on the Efficiency in Severe Core Degradation Prevention of Depressurization and Water Injection into Steam Generators following.
Sahar Rahim MS-Electrical Engineering Supervisor: Dr. Nadeem Javaid
Jordan University of Science and Technology
PUMA : Purdue University Multi-Dimensional Integral Test Assembly Scientific Design of the Scaled Facility for GE SBWR Design SBWR : Simplified Boiling.
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
Retraining for APR1400 Operator
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
Nuclear Energy.
Simulink Support for VEX Cortex BEST Robotics Sandeep Hiremath
Fission and Fusion of Atomic Nuclei
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO
Objectives To gain a basic understanding of the Engineering and Technology Pathway. To discover career options available within the Engineering and Technology.
IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
Preliminary Analysis of Loss of Vacuum Events in ARIES-RS
(INDIAN PRESSURISED WATER REACTOR) Distinguished Scientist & RRF
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
NUMERICAL STUDY OF IN-VESSEL CORIUM RETENTION IN A BWR REACTOR M
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS Moustafa Aziz Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority.
Fission Simple diagram of nuclear fission. In the first frame, a neutron is about to collide with the nucleus of a U-235 atom. In the second frame, the.
Presentation transcript:

Severe Accident Modeling and 3D Graphic Visualization Authors: Dr. Vladimir Nosatov, WSC Dr. Wei Huiming, CNPSC

Contents Company Brief Introduction Severe accidents’ (SA) phenomena Integral Codes available for SA simulation Using MELCOR-2.1 models for SA Real-Time simulation on BARAKAH FSS Examples of SA model using in FSS 2D and 3D Graphical Visualization of SA results

WSC Company Overview Technology Driven Company Research Oriented – over 20% of gross profit goes into R&D Employees: ≈ 85; Multidisciplinary team of nuclear, mechanical, electrical, chemical engineers, physicists and computer scientists, 30% with advances degrees. Headquarters in Frederick, Maryland, USA Main Business - Power Plant Simulation Nuclear Power Plant Simulators 40% Conventional Power Plant Simulators 30% Simulation Assisted Engineering 20% Navy and Marine Simulation 5% Process and Pipelines 5% ISO 9001:2015 Certified

WSC HQ Location

WSC Simulation Technology High Fidelity Simulation for use in: Development of Replica Training Simulators Nuclear, Coal, Combined Cycle & Gas Plants, Solar, Process, Pipeline… Part-Task and Full-Scope Simulators Classroom Simulators Web based simulators Simulation Assisted Engineering (SAE) System Analysis and Design Human Factors Engineering Logic and Control Testing, V&V Plant Optimization Plant Test and Operating procedures – e.g. commissioning procedures

WSC Simulator Installations 6

Our Customers

Nuclear Full Scope Replica Simulators China, CNPSC Ningde Korea and UAE KHNP Shin Kori and Barakah APR1400 Taiwan, TPC Lungmen Northrop Grumman Ship Building Bettis / Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory General Dynamics Electric Boat USA, APS Palo Verde 8

Barakah Three (3) MCR Full Scope Simulators

WSC Training and Engineering Simulators 3KEYSOFTWARE

Simulation Technology Overview Software Products Suite for Comprehensive Plant Coverage 3KEYMASTER™ Simulation Platform and Modeling Tools - Flagship for this Suite Graphical Engineering Station for Simulation Development and Control / Instructor Station 2-Phase Flow network Tool Electrical Network Tool Logic & Control and Relay Tools Component Tool and Library 3KEYRELAP5-RT™ – Adaptation of INEEL’s RELAP-3D©, including NESTLE, to run in real-time with visualization, provides best-estimate engineering grade modeling for Thermal-hydraulics and Neutron Kinetics 3KEYSAA™ – Severe Accident Analysis Models MELCOR / MAAP 3KEYDCS™ – is our solution for Distributed Control Systems that provides accurate emulation for Control and Logic, Man-Machine Interfaces, including trend and alarm displays 3KEYSAFE™/3KEYCATALOG ™ – Configuration Management Solution for managing the simulator configuration to the reference plant design through various stages of plant design evolution 3KEYTOUCH™ – Alternative Training Delivery Platform 3KEYITS/3KEYSTUDENT™ – Web and Classroom based Simulator Lesson delivery

MELCOR Tutorial Schematic of Test Problem

Physical Phenomena Inherent in Severe Accidents Thermal-hydraulic response of the primary, secondary and containment; Thermo-mechanical and chemical processes in the Core: fuel heat-up, cladding oxidation, fuel degradation, and core material melting and relocation; Heat-up of reactor bottom head, mechanical loading and failure, and transfer of core materials to the reactor cavity; Core-concrete attack in reactor cavity and ensuing gases and aerosols generation; In-vessel and ex-vessel hydrogen production, transport, and combustion; Fission product release (aerosol and vapor), transport, and deposition, including scrubbing in water pools, particle agglomeration and gravitational settling; Impact of engineered safety features on thermal-hydraulic and radionuclide behavior.

Integrated codes available for Severe Accident simulation MELCOR MAAP SCDAP/RELAP5 MELCOR-2.1 code was chosen base on 3 main criteria: Possibility to get license; Code ability to simulate severe accidents in real-time; Code ability to simulate all main phenomena during severe accident.

Visualization of Core Components (PWR) in MELCOR Code Control Rods (NS) Fuel Assemblies (FU + CL) Core Baffle or Shroud (SH) Core Formers (FM) Core Support Barrel (HS) Vessel Cylinder (HS) Particulate in Channel (PD) Particulate in Bypass (PB)

Switching Real-Time Simulation between RELAP and MELCOR Using MELCOR-2.1 models for SA simulation on BARAKAH FSS Switching Real-Time Simulation between RELAP and MELCOR Logical event causing automatic switch to the severe accident model Transferring data from TH (RELAP) model to SA (MELCOR) model Switching signals and indications to the SA model

RELAP and MELCOR Nodalization of BARAKAH RCS

FB and MELCOR Nodalization of BARAKAH Containment

BARAKAH Core region nodalization in Relap

Transferring data between RELAP and MELCOR

Scheme of data Conversion from RELAP to MELCOR Data base MELCOR Data base

RELAP - MELCOR Transition Functionality Seamless transition between RELAP and MELCOR severe accident model is performed “on the fly”. At that point in time the following has to be done: The physical parameters specific to the current simulation state (such as fuel temperatures, moderator densities etc.) have to be communicated to MELCOR model. This has to be done in such a way that the MELCOR model will start the computation using the actual physical parameters. The other modeling tool (RELAP) has to stop its modeling because both perform modeling of the same parts of the nuclear power plant. MELCOR has to start the computation using the physical parameters specific to the current simulation state that have been transferred to the MELCOR model. RELAP application is halted

3KEYMASTER Settings before and after switchover

Examples of SA model using in FSS MCR personal, Technical Support Engineers, Emergency response Team training for response in conditions of core severe damage; Drills for Emergency response Team and Accident management participating in severe accident mitigation; Verification of Emergency Operation Procedure and Severe Accident Management Guidelines

Scenarios for SA model verification on BARAKAH FSS SA initiated by SBO event; SA initiated by LB LOCA; SA initiated by SB LOCA; SA initiated by TLOFW; SA initiated by TLOCCW

Pressure in Secondary Side

Pressure in Pressurizer

Cladding temperature in Core

Hydrogen concentration in Containment

2D Graphical Visualization of SA results

2D Graphical Visualization of SA results

2D Graphical Visualization of SA results

3D Graphical Visualization of SA results

Questions

WSC invites YOU

WSC Contact Information Thank You! Dr. Vladimir Nosatov WSC, Inc. 7196 Crestwood Blvd, Suite 300 Frederick, MD 21703 www.ws-corp.com