Beam Loading  Total kick ~ 1.53nm/ppm

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise measurement of the density -dependence.
Advertisements

CEBAF Photoinjector: What’s new, what’s the same since HAPPEx 2004? What needs to be done? M. Poelker, HAPPEx collaboration meeting, Feb. 18, 2005.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) April 07, Notes: 1.For each BPM, the wires are: +X+, +X-, +Y+, +Y- 2.There are only two injector BPMs we are not reading:
R. Michaels PVDIS at Nov 2009 Beam Requirements for PVDIS Property ValueRun-Avg Hel. Correl. 1-Day Hel. Correl. Energy 6 and 4.8 GeVdE/E < 1 ppm < 5 ppm.
Probe beam distortion in TBTS due to high gradient RF acceleration (first part: observations) CTF3/TBTS Logbook 17 May 2013 Wilfrid Farabolini – Alexej.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies June & July 2006 Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
Diffraction of “low energy” electrons from free-standing transmission gratings Ben McMorran and Alex Cronin University of Arizona.
Jan 12, 2007 Spectrometer for PVDIS High Luminosity Spectrometer for PVDIS in JLab Hall A Rutgers town meeting.
Chapter 5 Objectives 1. Find ordered pairs associated with two equations 2. Solve a system by graphing 3. Solve a system by the addition method 4. Solve.
ATF2 Progress Report For CLIC Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO.
Electronic Cross-talk & Ground Loop Elimination in Injector Riad Suleiman Center for Injectors and Sources.
PQB Photocathode Analyzing Power Study May 19, 2009.
Hall A Parity Workshop (May 10, 2002), 1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
Magnet Target Detectors Beam (Phase I) (Phase II) The G 0 experiment : Doug Beck Spokesperson. Collaboration : Caltech, Carnegie-Mellon, W&M, Hampton,
SYNTHESIS Unsolved Mysteries 1.Elementary particles patterns? 2.Where is all the anti-matter? 3.Dark Matter? 4.Dark Energy?
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
HBD-CF4Transmittance (The case of the Anomalous O2 Spikes) HBD Meeting 1/5/2010 B.Azmoun, S.Stoll Brookhaven National Lab.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
MOKE RESULTS JM micron square pads 50nm Ni/ C10-dithiol / 20nm Co Line scan across Pad
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
2 Peter 3:14-18 (p. 861) “A simple man believes anything, but a prudent man gives thought to his steps.” ~ Proverbs 14:15 ~
November 18, 2011David L. Rubin1 CESR Test Accelerator – Investigation of the physics of charged particle beams Circumference = 768m - Beam energy
Basic Concepts Lecture ( Chapter 1) Electronics Objectives Use base units for specifying and calculating energy and work. Understand energy conversion.
Electrical Energy. Electric Potential Energy Note: Energy is scalar, so keep the sign on the charge +d means movement in the same direction as the E-field.
G 0 PC Installation and Beam Studies Stephanie Bailey Riad Suleiman.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
LED Experiment Edward Cazalas Chris Sopko 9/9/13.
Moments In order to understand Mechanisms better, we need to understand pivots, moments and equilibrium. Boom Counter balance weight.
Brief review of past studies on Wakefield ATF2 Proj. Mtg K.Kubo.
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Analysis Meeting Feb08, JLab.
E.C. Aschenauer RSC - Meeting 2012/03/232  Known complications:  100 GeV: o noise due to pickup especially at injection less significant at flat top.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Topic: Electrical Circuits PSSA: B / S8.C.2.1.
Beam jitter experiment of exchanging power supplies
Nucleon Strangeness: What we know and what we are still missing
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
Order Pairs An introduction.
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
18-1 Schematic Diagrams and Circuits
آشنایی با توربین انبساطی و کاربرد آن‌ در نیروگاه‌های تولید برق
7.1 System of Equations Solve by graphing.
التدريب الرياضى إعداد الدكتور طارق صلاح.
You Can Count on Me Personal Skills: Responsibility
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
Timed photon counter 5 ΔV 4 ΔV 3 ΔV 30 μm 2 ΔV ΔV Diameter 30 μm Pitch
Qweak Coordination Meeting
Adiabatic Damping and Parity Quality of Low Energy
Feedback Systems Joe Grames Hall A Parity Meeting Jefferson Lab
Injector Studies Using Superlattice Photocathode
Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.
500 nm WRITE VOLTAGE 0 V.
Current status Minjung Kim.
PQB Meeting March 05, 2009.
DANE Upgrade DA Optimization
G0 PC Installation and Beam Studies
B-Team Meeting October 28, 2009
Kirchhoff’s Laws.
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
CLEAR’s Inductive Beam Position Monitors
Online Pogo Game Customer Service
Pogo Game Customer Care Helpline Number

Call Pogo Contact Phone Number and Enjoy Pogo Game
Presentation transcript:

Beam Loading  Total kick ~ 1.53nm/ppm Can the correlation between charge asymmetry and position differences be explained by beam loading? Observed correlation between Aq and x,y position differences are: X: 0.3 nm/ppm Y: -1.5 nm/ppm RHWP and IA scans show consistent correlations Therefore, 100ppm charge asymmetry would cause ~150nm position difference. Is this consistent with beam loading? Charge asymmetry – Energy difference corralation is ~ -1.1 eV/ppm Therefore, -1.1 eV/ppm * 100ppm * dispersion_at_target= 150 nm Dispersion_at_target = 1.4nm/eV = 1.4mm/MeV ~ 47 mm/%_change_in_E This beam loading factor seems too large and inconsistent with the tune capable at JLab.  Total kick ~ 1.53nm/ppm