PR+: Program Review, Integrated Planning & Resource Allocation Prioritization CAIR Conference Nov. 14, 2018 Institutional Research for Public Good Vince.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR and Linked Institutional Planning and Budgeting Lisa Marie McCauley, Kings College, VP/CFO.
Advertisements

State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
Role of Budget Committee Create consensus on definitions Emergency Maintenance of Effort New Initiatives Discretionary Funds All Money Carryovers Base.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP) Planning, Assessment, Allocation Learn More.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
NEASC FIVE YEAR REPORT FITCHBURG STATE COLLEGE JANUARY 2007.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
FY15 Academic Affairs Budget Planning & Discussion UC Raccoon Mountain Room March 17, 2014.
Incorporating SLOs and Assessment into Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation in a Time of Budget Reduction Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator.
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement Plan(CCIP) Training Module 2 Planning Tool, Part 1.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN TIMELINE Mr. Rick Miranda Acting Vice President, Academic Affairs/Asst. Superintendent Dr. Kristi Blackburn Dean of Institutional.
Strategic Educational Master Plan Process Committee DRAFT PROPOSAL Dr. Doug MacIntire Dr. Gari Browning.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Conceptualizing PR+ integrated planning, driven by program review, connecting to resource allocation Dr. Kristi Blackburn, Dean of Institutional Effectiveness,
“Our Commitment to Impact: Implementing Penn State’s Strategic Plan”
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
PMI Chapter, IT Governance, Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and.
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Institutional Effectiveness Plan
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Conducting the performance appraisal
Performance Management Workday Module
Annual Update Plan A Detailed Walk-through of Key Topics.
Healthy Program Reporting
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Conducting the performance appraisal
at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
SBCCD Collegial Consultation and Institutional Planning
The Strategic Information Technology Formulation
Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Budget Development Process
Program Review and Accreditation
FY15-16 Budget Request & Monitoring Training
BCCHS Annual Title I Meeting A Single-School District LEA September 10, 2015 December 3, 2015.
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Completing your Program Review
Streamlining the Program Review Process
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
March, 2019 Patrick DiMambro, CPA, MBA
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
Completing your Program Review
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
STRATEGIC GOAL III Strengthen planning, budgeting and assessment.
Presentation transcript:

PR+: Program Review, Integrated Planning & Resource Allocation Prioritization CAIR Conference Nov. 14, 2018 Institutional Research for Public Good Vince Orton, Sr. Systems Analyst Dr. Kristi Blackburn, Dean of Institutional Effectiveness, Research, & Planning Cerritos College

Session Description & Session SLOs Demonstrate our integrated program review, planning, and resource request prioritization process SLO: Attendees will be able to recognize the elements the ACCJC requires for integrated processes of program review and planning (Bloom: remember/recall) We will also demonstrate the elements which meet the required faculty driven Instructional Program Review requirements, along with the required Perkins (CTE) reporting. SLO: Attendees will be able to analyze their own IPR/Perkins reporting requirements and reflect on their College’s process (Bloom: apply/analyze) We will show the culmination of Unit -> Division -> Area-> College Annual plan and Budget process. SLO: Attendees will be able to describe how resources are prioritized at the Unit/Division level, and how they are “rolled up” by the Division/Area/ College Plans (Bloom: understand/analyze)

ACCJC on evaluation and integrated planning Standard I. B. Assuring Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness PR+ makes it possible for Cerritos College to show our integrated program review and planning process: Is driving goal setting Which leads to the identification of activities and resource requests. Resource requests are prioritized in alignment with the college’s over arching planning documents.

Figure 1. Integrated Program Review, Planning, and Resource Allocation Process (Annual) STAGE A: Evaluation/Assessment/Evidence Program Review STAGE B: Goal Setting SMART: Specific, Measureable, Actionable, Realistic, Time determined STAGE C: Establish activities/initiatives to accomplish goals STAGE D: Identify and request Resources Needed to perform activities STAGE E: Prioritize resource requests STAGE F: Implement Activities/Initiatives that were allocated resources Annual Plans align to: Educational Master Plan Strategic Plan/strategic goals Enrollment Management Plan Integrated Plan (BSI/3SP/Student Equity) Technology Plan Human Resource Plan EEO/Diversity Plan Facilities Master Plan Sustainability Plan Other plans as mandated by CCCCO Step 1: Unit Annual Plan Chairs/Directors/ Managers develop Resource request prioritization Step 2: Division Annual Plan Managers develop Resource request Prioritization for Divisions Step 3: Area Annual Plan VPs/President present to Planning & Budget Committee Resource request Prioritization Step 5: Executive Council Resource request prioritization. Establish College Annual Budget Provides Feedback back to Planning & Budget Committee As to allocations approved STEP 6: President Annual Budget Step 4: College Annual Plan Planning & Budget Committee recommends Resource request Prioritization to Exec STEP 7: Board of Trustees Adopts Annual Budget Feedback Feedback Feedback Feedback

PR+ Development 2013-14: Instructional Program Review Committee determined need for PR+ to replace Planning+ to add the program review capabilities (anchor) 2015: Launched with limited modules 2016-17: Expanded functionality Resource requests Overview creation Full functionality: 2017-18 cycle Roll forward previous year (by Units) Roll up resource requests to Division/Area/College (integrates subordinate plans) Added CTE/Perkins Reporting Requirements Added Curriculum Review to support the IPR component Added SLO/SAO Reporting

Design of PR+ COLLEGE PLAN AREA DIVISION UNIT AREA DIVISION UNIT COLLEGE PLAN: Built from the roll up/approvals of the Area Plan AREA PLAN: Built from the roll up/approvals of the Division Plan DIVISION PLAN: Built from the roll up/approvals of the Unit Plans *Some Divisions behave as Units and do not have Units which roll up. The managers with these types of plans follow the training for the Unit Plan UNIT PLAN: The base of the planning/resource allocation corner stone. If Unit Plan not submitted, nothing to roll up COLLEGE PLAN AREA DIVISION UNIT AREA DIVISION UNIT

PR+ OVERVIEW (how it flows): REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL DATA; AND ADD DATA FILES (Advisory Board minutes, etc.) CREATE SWOTS EACH SWOT MAY HAVE A GOAL THE GOAL THEN HAS AN ACTIVITY OR ACTIVITIES THE ACTIVITIES MAY HAVE A RESOURCE ALLOCATION REQUEST It is a nested program. One step will lead to the next Think of it as long division: showing your work to obtain the ability to request a resource (if it is needed)

WHEREVER YOU SEE A PENCIL, IT IS TO EDIT WHEREVER YOU SEE AN “X”, IT IS TO DELETE WHEREVER YOU SEE A PLUS, ADDING FILES OR CONTENT WHEREVER YOU SEE ARROWS, ORDER FILES OR CONTENT

PROCESS BEGINS WITH REVIEWING DATA FROM REVIEW OF DATA, CREATE SWOTs: STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS Strengths & Weaknesses are internal (have control) Opportunities & Threats are external (no control)

GOALS ADDRESS SWOTs

DETERMINE ACTIVITIES TO ACHIEVE GOAL

REQUEST A RESOURCE FOR THE ACTIVITY

RESOURCE REQUEST Nested to the activity 1. Determine resource type 2 RESOURCE REQUEST Nested to the activity 1.Determine resource type 2. Determine the tier and priority order of resource request. Priority will be dependent upon the # of requests you have. Fro example if you have 10 requests, you will number 1-10 with highest priority being 1. 3.Determine criteria for funding request 4.Determine funding source 5. AMOUNT: ONLY NUMBERS 6.Determine how long funding is needed (one time v. ongoing) 7.Provide a description—if this resource request supports multiple goals/activities, make a note of it here 8.Save RESOURCE REQUESTS ARE ONLY ENTERED ONCE even if ACTIVITY ties to multiple goals Activities can tie to multiple goals (one to many); but resource requests only tie to one activity (one to one)

EACH SWOT MAY HAVE A GOAL THE GOAL THEN HAS AN ACTIVITY OR ACTIVITIES REPEAT STEPS: REVIEW INSTITUTIONAL DATA; AND ADD DATA FILES (Advisory Board minutes, etc.) CREATE SWOTS EACH SWOT MAY HAVE A GOAL THE GOAL THEN HAS AN ACTIVITY OR ACTIVITIES THE ACTIVITIES MAY HAVE A RESOURCE ALLOCATION REQUEST

OVERVIEW SNAPSHOT THIS IS PLAN TREE ORIENTED

Unit Plans can “roll forward” for the next year’s cycle so the plans don’t require being built from the ground up SELECT THE CALENDAR ICON THIS IS WHERE THE “ROLL FORWARD” IS LOCATED

Creating the Division/Area/College Annual Plan Lowest level of subordinate plan is “rolled up” to the next level Units -> Division -> Area -> College Division (with no subordinate units) -> Area -> College

TO START THE “ROLL UP” (DIVISION, AREA, OR COLLEGE): THE BARS ICON IS WHERE THE “ROLL UP” FUNCTION IS LOCATED

RESOURCE ORIENTED EXAMPLE: CA DEVELOPED A GOAL FROM 8 OF THEIR SWOTS. THE GOAL WILL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH 3 ACTIVITIES. THE ACTIVITIES HAVE 5 RESOURCE REQUESTS.

SELECT WHICH ITEMS YOU ARE “ROLLING UP” (APPROVING) BY CLICKING BOXES ITEMS UNCHECKED ARE NOT ROLLED UP (NOT APPROVED)

This is what it looks like completed

Divisions/Areas Review/Edit the items rolled up and make adjustments to RESOURCE REQUESTS Ensure agreement with the funding source (ie. Gen fund, Categorical, etc.) EDIT IF NEEDED Ensure agreement with the Tier it was assigned at the subordinate level Manager then prioritizes at the Division/Area/College level the order of priority If 10 resource requests, ordered by highest priority 1-10. No ties. Whole numbers All items need to be numbered in priority number Should follow that Tier 1 have the lowest numbers meaning highest priority Manager removes resource request IF funding from existing rollover budget Comment added to the Activity stating funded from Manager’s existing rollover budget Resource requests are ONLY for monies needed BEYOND allocated (rollover) budget

Area Plans & The College Annual Plan Area Plan “extracts” VPs review their extract and organize their Area priorities Leadership provided by VPs: meetings or retreat (depends on VP) Area Plans presented to Planning & Budget Committee College Annual Plan VPs present their Area plan to Planning & Budget Committee Discussion by committee: EMP/Strategic initiatives, other planning documents Alignment to anticipated budget LEAD INTO LIVE DEMO