Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb CERN SL/AP n Layout n Crossing Scheme n Luminosity n Collision.
Advertisements

Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
Spectrometer compensation in IR2 and IR8 during the 450 GeV collision run September 11, 2006 LOC meeting Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to S. Fartoukh, W. Herr,
* IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 vertical crossing angle at IP8 R. Bruce, W. Herr, B. Holzer Acknowledgement: S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli, J. Wenninger.
Internal target option for RHIC Drell-Yan experiment Wolfram Fischer and Dejan Trbojevic 31 October 2010 Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC Parameter Space for HL-LHC IR8 * IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 LEB Meeting.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
The Large Hadron Collider Contents: 1. The machine II. The beam III. The interaction regions IV. First LHC beam [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
With a lot of help from Reine Versteegen, John Jowett, Richard Jacobson, Burkhard Schmidt, Gilda Scioli, Werner Herr CERN-LHC * IP5 IP1 IP8 Spectrometer.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
LHC Machine Operational Status and Plans LHCC, 22nd September 2010 Steve Myers (On behalf of the LHC team and international collaborators)
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
How low can we go? Getting below β*=3.5m R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann Acknowledgment: T. Baer, W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, B. Goddard,W.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
HL-LHC Aperture Update
D0 and its integrability
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Spectrometer Operation in IP2 & 8
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
The LHC collider in Geneva
VELO detector and available aperture in IR8
Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run
Equipment of experiments directly interfering with the beam operation
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Global aperture measurements at 450 GeV with 170 mrad crossing angle
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Collimation margins and *
Luminometer Integration at IR2
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
Commissioning of the Beam Conditions Monitor of the LHCb Experiment at CERN Ch. Ilgner, October 23, 2008 on behalf of the LHCb BCM group at TU Dortmund:
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Thanks to S. Fartoukh, W. Herr, B. Jeanneret, M. Giovannozzi
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
Beam dynamics requirements on MQT
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Saturday 29th October Friday during IP2 1 m squeeze test
Presentation transcript:

Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run Machine Protection Working Group Collision bump amplitudes for the 450 GeV run Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to R. Assmann, O. Brüning, D. Duarte Ramos, S. Fartoukh, M. Ferro-Luzzi, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, B. Jeanneret, V. Kain, D. Macina, G. Robert-Demolaize, G. Schneider, M. Zerlauth, ABP/LOC team and LHCC working group December 1st, 2006

Background and outline LTC Actions (August 06) Can the experimental spectrometer magnets of IR2 and IR8 operate with their maximum field (corresponding to 7TeV) during the 450 GeV collisions run? Can the VELO detector on IR8 be closed to its minimum aperture? Results presented on LHCCWG (September 06) and LTC (October 06) triggering questions on machine protection Outline Motivation from experiments IR2/8 nominal injection optics, crossing schemes, spectrometer magnets and internal crossing angles Aperture loss for maximum spectrometer strengths at 450 GeV. Available aperture for the VELO detector in IR8 Compensator magnets failure considerations Operational and machine protection issues 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

M. Ferro-Luzzi, et al. PH/LBD 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

IR2 Injection optics (O. Brüning et al IR2 Injection optics (O. Brüning et al. LHC Project rep 367 – LHC design report 2004) Beam 1 Beam 1 Beam 2 Beam 2 β*=10m, vertical crossing angle of ±240μrad and horizontal parallel separation of ± 2mm External angle of ±170μrad for reducing the long range beam-beam effect Internal angle of ±70μrad for compensating spectrometer orbit distortion Horizontal separation positive for Beam 1 and negative for Beam 2, due to the ring geometry Angle sign can be chosen arbitrarily (following spectrometer polarity) 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

ALICE dipole magnet and its compensators 3m-long spectrometer dipole (MBAW) @ 10m to the right of the IP Vertical deflection with nominal integrated field of 3Tm (deflection of 130μrad @ 7TeV) The resulting orbit deflection is compensated by three dipole magnets Two 1.5m-long magnets of type MBXWT @ 20m left and right of the IP One 2.6m-long magnet of type MBWMD @ 10m to the left of the IP Two Beam Position Monitors (BPMWS) are located upstream and downstream of the two MBXWT to monitor the internal bump closure 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Injection optics around IR2 Equipment Aperture [mm] β [m] BPMSW.1L2 30 57 MBXWT.1L2 26 56 - 48 MBWMD.1L2 24 - 19 IP2 29 10 MBAW.1R2 151 17 - 23 MBXWT.1R2 48 - 56 BPMSW.1R2 Beam size varies between 0.8 and 0.3mm The dispersion is smaller than a few cm 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Internal crossing bump of IR2 Internal crossing angle of ±70μrad in the vertical plane (maximum deflection of ±0.7mm at MBWMD) External crossing angle follows spectrometer dipole polarity 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Nominal injection aperture in IR2 Equipment n1 [σ] n1 [mm] n1 [%] BPMSW.1L2 20 14 47 MBXWT.1L2 17 11 42 MBWMD.1L2 33 IP2 53 15 52 MBAW.1R2 221 93 58 MBXWT.1R2 BPMSW.1R2 BEAM 1 MBXWT MBWMD IP2 MBAW Aperture is computed taking into account nominal tolerances (see LHC Design report 2004) β-beating of 20%, spurious dispersion of 0.27, momentum offset of 0.15%, peak closed orbit of 4mm and mechanical tolerances for each magnet Different scenarios are considered ± or no external crossing angle, ± internal crossing angle, with/without separation bump Aperture varies for less than 3σ among the different cases and for both beams Around 50% of the available aperture is lost in all compensators and 40% in the spectrometer (but a lot of margin in that area) 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Internal crossing bump of IR2 with collision strength for the spectrometer dipole Internal crossing angle of ±1.1mrad in the vertical plane Maximum deflection of ±11mm at MBWMD, corresponding to 25σ, as compared to ±0.65mm (1.6σ) of the nominal injection bump 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Aperture in IR2 with full spectrometer dipole strength BEAM 1 Not important impact in any element apart MBWMD Available aperture of 9mm (with respect to 14mm), corresponding to 13σ of aperture loss Remaining aperture is 30% of the available MBAW MBWMD MBXWT IP2 MBXWT Equipment n1 nominal [σ] n1 full [σ] n1 nominal [mm] n1 full [mm] n1 nominal [%] n1 full [%] BPMSW.1L2 20 14 47 MBXWT.1L2 17 11 42 MBWMD.1L2 33 9 30 IP2 53 15 52 MBAW.1R2 221 217 93 88 62 58 MBXWT.1R2 BPMSW.1R2

IR8 Injection optics (O. Brüning et al IR8 Injection optics (O. Brüning et al. LHC Project rep 367 – LHC design report 2004) Beam 1 Beam 2 Beam 1 Beam 2 β*=10m, horizontal crossing angle of -/+35 or -/+300μrad depending on spectrometer polarity and vertical parallel separation of ±2mm External angle of -/+170 (+ polarity) or -/+165 μrad (+ polarity) Internal angle of ±135 μrad for compensating spectrometer orbit distortion Horizontal crossing angle always negative for Beam 1 and positive for Beam 2 Vertical separation sign can be chosen arbitrarily 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

LHCb dipole magnet 1.9m-long spectrometer dipole (MBLW) @ 4.9m to the right of the IP Horizontal deflection with nominal integrated field of 4.2Tm (deflection of 180μrad @ 7TeV) The resulting orbit deflection is compensated by three dipole magnets Two 0.8m-long magnets of type MBXWS @ 20m left and right of the IP One 3.4m-long magnet of type MBXWH @ 5m to the left of the IP Two Beam Position Monitors (BPMWS) are located upstream and downstream of the two MBXWS to monitor the internal bump closure 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Injection optics around the IR8 Beam size varies between 0.7 and 0.3mm The dispersion is smaller than a few cm, as in IR2 Equipment Aperture [mm] β [m] BPMSW.1L8 30 57 MBXWS.1L8 26 55 - 52 MBXWH.1L8 15 - 12 IP8 10 MBLW.1R8 64 12 - 14 MBXWS.1R8 52 - 55 BPMSW.1R8 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Internal crossing bump of IR8 Internal crossing angle of ±135μrad in the horizontal plane (maximum deflection of ±0.6mm at MBXWH) External crossing angle does not follow spectrometer dipole polarity 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Nominal injection aperture in IR8 Equipment n1 [σ] n1 [mm] n1 [%] BPMSW.1L8 20 14 45 MBXWS.1L8 16 10 40 MBXWH.1L8 34 12 IP8 56 52 MBLW.1R8 111 37 58 MBXWS.1R8 BPMSW.1R8 BEAM 1 MBLW IP8 MBXWH MBXWS MBXWS Aperture is computed taking into account the nominal tolerances and the scenarios studied for IR2 Differences with respect to IR2 on the 2nd compensator (smaller β) and spectrometer (smaller β and aperture) Aperture varies for less than 3σ between the scheme with only internal and complete crossing scheme and for both beams and separation polarities Around 50-60% of the available aperture is lost for all compensators and 40% for the spectrometer 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Internal crossing bump of IR8 with collision strength for the spectrometer dipole Internal crossing angle of ±2.1mrad in the horizontal plane Deflection of 10mm at MBXWH, corresponding to 29σ, as compared to 0.6mm (2σ) of the nominal bump 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Aperture in IR8 with full spectrometer dipole strength BEAM 1 MBXWS MBXWH IP8 MBLW Not important impact in any element apart MBXWH Available aperture of 6mm (with respect to 12mm), corresponding to 15σ of aperture loss Remaining aperture corresponds 24% of the available Equipment n1 nominal [σ] n1 full [σ] n1 nominal [mm] n1 full [mm] n1 nominal [%] n1 full [%] BPMSW.1L8 20 14 45 MBXWS.1L8 16 10 40 MBXWH.1L8 34 19 12 6 24 IP8 56 15 52 MBLW.1R8 111 95 37 31 58 50 MBXWS.1R8 BPMSW.1R8

VErtex LOcator in LHCb Used for precise localization of track coordinates close to the interaction region in order to reconstruct production and decay vertices of b-hadrons Surrounding IP8 (from ~0.35m left to 0.75m right) Series of retractable silicon sensors closing down to an aperture of 5mm radius M. Ferro-Luzzi, PH/LBD Sensor boxes can be centered around the beam by moving laterally (by 30mm) and up or down (by 5mm) Ability to locate precisely the beam position from beam gas events 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Simple considerations regarding aperture J. Van den Brand, PH/ULB β-function of 10.07m at right side of VELO Beam size of 0.28mm at injection (0.07mm at collision) VELO minimum aperture of 5mm corresponds to 18σ (as compared to 72σ at collision) 7σ tolerance corresponds to 2mm (0.49mm @ 7TeV) For nominal crossing angle of ±135μrad, horizontal displacement of 0.1mm at VELO’s right edge (0.4σ) For nominal crossing angle of ±135μrad, horizontal displacement of 0.1mm at VELO’s right edge (0.4σ) Peak orbit tolerance of 4mm corresponds to 14.3σ “Magnet”-type mechanical tolerance of 2.2mm corresponds to 7.7σ (realistic tolerance of 0.2mm) 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Closure of the VELO for different scenarios The VELO apertures quoted allow n1 =7σ They are computed for no separation and external crossing angle Influence of the separation important mostly for small internal crossing angles Influence of the external crossing angle is minimal Different spectrometer polarity has a minor influence in the available aperture Between the nominal and extreme crossing angle the difference is around 1.5mm Internal crossing angle [mrad] VELO aperture at collision VELO aperture with loose mechanical tolerances [mm] VELO aperture with tight mechanical tolerances [mm] With CO tol. of 3mm With CO tol. of 4mm Without CO tol. 2.1 - 11.1 7.1 9.1 5.1 0.135 4.0 9.6 5.6 7.6 3.6 -2.1 11.2 7.2 9.2 5.2 -0.135 4.1 9.7 5.7 7.7 3.7 * Minimum VELO closure at 5mm radius For the loose mechanical tolerance of 2.2mm For nominal internal crossing angle, the VELO cannot be closed to less than 9.6mm After centring it around the CO, it can be closed down to 5.6mm (for no internal crossing angle) or to 7.1-7.2mm for extreme crossing angle For a tight mechanical tolerance of 0.2mm, 2mm can be gained for all quoted values The VELO can be closed down to 5.0mm for an internal crossing angle of ~2mrad The precision with which the detector can be centred around the beam is determinant 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou

Compensator failure considerations Time needed for compensator magnet failure, with simple exponential current decay, to create maximum orbit distortion of 1σ (2σ for dashed lines) as a function of the internal crossing angle (from nominal N=1 to extreme for N=16) Hundreds of ms for nominal crossing angle Tens of ms for extreme crossing angle Extreme power converter failures may further reduce the time (need of Fast Current Change Monitors – only in MBXWT up to now) Injection (450 GeV)   Short circuit Constant dI/dt Max V col magnet t for 6 tloss [m] [ms] MBAW 392 23 Not reached 17845.71 44204.57 19326.21 687.26 294.62 MBWMD 19 2409.44 26632.68 11643.79 157.38 67.82 MBXWT 55 10117.97 625.40 7119.79 3112.77 17.39 7.57 MBLW 342 14 28026.42 5446.31 21765.68 9515.94 426.07 184.13 MBXWH 11 1572.32 32303.82 14123.21 47.34 20.54 MBXWS 64241.49 28086.34 30.71 13.25 A. Gomez-Alonso, AB/CO

Operational and machine protection issues Main limitations in the aperture of 2nd compensator for both IR2 and 8. Although n1>7σ, available aperture quite small, especially in IR8 MBWMD (IR2) with n1 of 9mm (with respect to 14mm) MBXWH (IR8) with n1 of 6mm (with respect to 12mm) It is advisable not to inject with extreme bump in place, for ensuring protection of experimental areas in case of failures During early commissioning stages, machine optics may be far from nominal values considered in aperture estimations LTC recommendation for performing the corresponding beam optics measurements may not be feasible due to limited amount of commissioning time With extreme bump amplitude, VELO can be closed to around 5.1-5.2mm, depending on precision with which beam can be located and mechanical detector tolerances With VELO open, a precise estimation of the beam position not straightforward 5mm mechanical half-aperture is extremely small, if not the smallest around the machine (depending on the closure of collimators) VELO protection against equipment failures or beam distortions has to be discussed Fast Current Change Monitors needed for failure protection of all spectrometer compensator magnets 01/12/2006 MPWG, Y. Papaphilippou