CALCULATED vs MEASURED ENERGY DISSIPATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Element Method CHAPTER 4: FEM FOR TRUSSES
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO MECHANICS FOR SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Chap.8 Mechanical Behavior of Composite
Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Basic Concepts in Ductile Detailing
Beam Design Beam Design Civil Engineering and Architecture
Passive Vibration Control
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
1 Dynamic/Seismic analysis of RC Element including shear effect.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss the behavior of columns.
Beam-Columns.
An-Najah National University
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
Rigid-Frame Structures
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Second order effects.
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
#1 212 Ketter Hall, North Campus, Buffalo, NY Fax: Tel: x 2400 Control of Structural Vibrations Lecture.
Nonlinear response- history analysis in design practice RUTHERFORD & CHEKENE November 2007 Joe Maffei.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Analyses of tunnel stability under dynamic loads Behdeen Oraee; Navid Hosseini; Kazem Oraee 1.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
ME 440 Intermediate Vibrations Tu, Feb. 17, 2009 Section 2.5 © Dan Negrut, 2009 ME440, UW-Madison.
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson September 24, 2014 SEAONC Lecture #2.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.
University of Palestine
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Static Pushover Analysis
Reinforced Concrete Design
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
1.
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Tall Building Initiative Response Evaluation Helmut Krawinkler Professor Emeritus Stanford University On behalf of the Guidelines writers: Y. Bozorgnia,
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES By Ed Wilson Draft dated 8/15/14 September SEAONC Lectures #2.
Adaptive Nonlinear Analysis as Applied to Performance based Earthquake Engineering Dr. Erol Kalkan, P.E. United States Geological Survey TUFTS, 2008.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
UNIT - IV PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
1 FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION Rayleigh-Ritz method approximate solution in the entire beam –Difficult to find good approximate solution (discontinuities.
Deflection and Stiffness
Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
Beams and Frames.
فصل اول 1- پیشگفتار 2- کلیات خوشا پیشگفتار: از دستاورد های امروزه مهندسی زلزله و سازه ، می توان طراحی سازه ها بر مبنای عملکرد را بر شمرد که اولا.
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
4 Pure Bending.
Earthquake resistant buildings
California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP)
4 Pure Bending.
Presentation transcript:

CALCULATED vs MEASURED

ENERGY DISSIPATION

IMPLICIT NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR

STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS

INELASTIC WORK DONE!

CAPACITY DESIGN STRONG COLUMNS & WEAK BEAMS IN FRAMES REDUCED BEAM SECTIONS LINK BEAMS IN ECCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES BUCKLING RESISTANT BRACES AS FUSES RUBBER-LEAD BASE ISOLATORS HINGED BRIDGE COLUMNS HINGES AT THE BASE LEVEL OF SHEAR WALLS ROCKING FOUNDATIONS OVERDESIGNED COUPLING BEAMS OTHER SACRIFICIAL ELEMENTS

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP

IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION

PERFORMANCE LEVELS

IDEALIZED FORCE DEFORMATION CURVE

ASCE 41 BEAM MODEL These capacities are for compact, laterally braced beams. The capacities are smaller for non-compact beams. The capacities in ASCE 41 are the same for all steel strengths and all depth-to-span ratios. Intuitively this looks like an over-simplification. The ASCE 41 recommendations are an excellent starting point, but the values will probably be revised as more experience is gained. Note that these capacities assume a symmetrical beam with no transverse load. They must be used with caution if the beam is unsymmetrical or if there are significant transverse loads.

ASCE 41 ASSESSMENT OPTIONS Linear Static Analysis Linear Dynamic Analysis (Response Spectrum or Time History Analysis) Nonlinear Static Analysis (Pushover Analysis) Nonlinear Dynamic Time History Analysis (NDI or FNA)

STRENGTH vs DEFORMATION ELASTIC STRENGTH DESIGN - KEY STEPS   CHOSE DESIGN CODE AND EARTHQUAKE LOADS DESIGN CHECK PARAMETERS Stress/BEAM MOMENT GET ALLOWABLE STRESSES/ULTIMATE– PHI FACTORS CALCULATE STRESSES – Load Factors (ST RS TH) CALCULATE STRESS RATIOS INELASTIC DEFORMATION BASED DESIGN -- KEY STEPS CHOSE PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND DESIGN LOADS – ASCE 41 DEMAND CAPACITY MEASURES – DRIFT/HINGE ROTATION/SHEAR GET DEFORMATION AND FORCE CAPACITIES CALCULATE DEFORMATION AND FORCE DEMANDS (RS OR TH) CALCULATE D/C RATIOS – LIMIT STATES

STRUCTURE and MEMBERS For a structure, F = load, D = deflection. For a component, F depends on the component type, D is the corresponding deformation. The component F-D relationships must be known. The structure F-D relationship is obtained by structural analysis.

FRAME COMPONENTS For each component type we need : Reasonably accurate nonlinear F-D relationships. Reasonable deformation and/or strength capacities. We must choose realistic demand-capacity measures, and it must be feasible to calculate the demand values. The best model is the simplest model that will do the job.

F-D RELATIONSHIP

DUCTILITY LATERAL LOAD Partially Ductile Ductile Brittle DRIFT

ASCE 41 - DUCTILE AND BRITTLE

FORCE AND DEFORMATION CONTROL

BACKBONE CURVE

HYSTERESIS LOOP MODELS

STRENGTH DEGRADATION

ASCE 41 DEFORMATION CAPACITIES This can be used for components of all types. It can be used if experimental results are available. ASCE 41 gives capacities for many different components. For beams and columns, ASCE 41 gives capacities only for the chord rotation model.

BEAM END ROTATION MODEL

PLASTIC HINGE MODEL It is assumed that all inelastic deformation is concentrated in zero-length plastic hinges. The deformation measure for D/C is hinge rotation.

PLASTIC ZONE MODEL The inelastic behavior occurs in finite length plastic zones. Actual plastic zones usually change length, but models that have variable lengths are too complex. The deformation measure for D/C can be : - Average curvature in plastic zone. - Rotation over plastic zone ( = average curvature x plastic zone length).

ASCE 41 CHORD ROTATION CAPACITIES LS CP Steel Beam qp/qy = 1 qp/qy = 6 qp/qy = 8 RC Beam Low shear High shear qp = 0.01 qp = 0.005 qp = 0.02 qp = 0.025

COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING MODEL 34

STEEL COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

CONCRETE COLUMN AXIAL-BENDING

SHEAR HINGE MODEL

PANEL ZONE ELEMENT Deformation, D = spring rotation = shear strain in panel zone. Force, F = moment in spring = moment transferred from beam to column elements. Also, F = (panel zone horizontal shear force) x (beam depth).

BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACE The BRB element includes “isotropic” hardening. The D-C measure is axial deformation.

BEAM/COLUMN FIBER MODEL The cross section is represented by a number of uni-axial fibers. The M-y relationship follows from the fiber properties, areas and locations. Stress-strain relationships reflect the effects of confinement

WALL FIBER MODEL

ALTERNATIVE MEASURE - STRAIN

NONLINEAR SOLUTION SCHEMES ƒ iteration ∆ ƒ u 1 2 iteration CONSTANT STIFFNESS ITERATION 3 4 5 6 1 2 ∆ ƒ ∆ u u NEWTON – RAPHSON ITERATION

CIRCULAR FREQUENCY +Y Y q Radius, R -Y

THE D, V & A RELATIONSHIP u . t ut1 .. Slope = ut1 t1

UNDAMPED FREE VIBRATION ) cos( t u w = + k m & where

RESPONSE MAXIMA u t ) cos( w = 2 - & sin( max

BASIC DYNAMICS WITH DAMPING u & - = w + x 2 M Ku C t C K g u &

RESPONSE FROM GROUND MOTION ug .. 2 ug2 ug1 1 t1 t2 Time t & A B t u g = + - x w

DAMPED RESPONSE { [ & ] cos ( )] sin } e u B t A = - + w Bt x [u ) xw 1 2 Bt x [u ) 3

SDOF DAMPED RESPONSE

RESPONSE SPECTRUM GENERATION Earthquake Record 0.40 0.20 16 GROUND ACC, g 0.00 14 -0.20 12 -0.40 10 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 DISPLACEMENT, inches 8 TIME, SECONDS 6 T= 0.6 sec 4 4.00 2 2.00 DISPL, in. 0.00 2 4 6 8 10 -2.00 PERIOD, Seconds -4.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 T= 2.0 sec 8.00 Displacement Response Spectrum 5% damping 4.00 DISPL, in. 0.00 -4.00 -8.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00

SPECTRAL PARAMETERS S PS w = V d a v DISPLACEMENT, in. PERIOD, sec 4 8 12 16 2 6 10 PERIOD, sec DISPLACEMENT, in. 20 30 40 VELOCITY, in/sec 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 ACCELERATION, g d V S PS w = v a

Spectral Acceleration, Sa THE ADRS SPECTRUM ADRS Curve Spectral Displacement, Sd Spectral Acceleration, Sa 2.0 Seconds 1.0 Seconds 0.5 Seconds Period, T RS Curve

THE ADRS SPECTRUM

ASCE 7 RESPONSE SPECTRUM

PUSHOVER

THE LINEAR PUSHOVER

EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION How far to push? The Target Point!

DISPLACEMENT MODIFICATION

DISPLACEMENT MODIFICATION Calculating the Target Displacement d = C0 C1 C2 Sa Te2 / (4p2) C0 Relates spectral to roof displacement C1 Modifier for inelastic displacement C2 Modifier for hysteresis loop shape

LOAD CONTROL AND DISPLACEMENT CONTROL

P-DELTA ANALYSIS

P-DELTA DEGRADES STRENGTH

P-DELTA EFFECTS ON F-D CURVES

THE FAST NONLINEAR ANALYSIS METHOD (FNA) NON LINEAR FRAME AND SHEAR WALL HINGES BASE ISOLATORS (RUBBER & FRICTION) STRUCTURAL DAMPERS STRUCTURAL UPLIFT STRUCTURAL POUNDING BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES

RITZ VECTORS

FNA KEY POINT The Ritz modes generated by the nonlinear deformation loads are used to modify the basic structural modes whenever the nonlinear elements go nonlinear.

ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKES CREATING HISTORIES TO MATCH A SPECTRUM FREQUENCY CONTENTS OF EARTHQUAKES FOURIER TRANSFORMS

ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKES

MESH REFINEMENT

APPROXIMATING BENDING BEHAVIOR This is for a coupling beam. A slender pier is similar.

ACCURACY OF MESH REFINEMENT

PIER / SPANDREL MODELS

STRAIN & ROTATION MEASURES

STRAIN CONCENTRATION STUDY Compare calculated strains and rotations for the 3 cases.

STRAIN CONCENTRATION STUDY No. of elems Roof drift Strain in bottom element Strain over story height Rotation over story height 1 2.32% 2.39% 1.99% 2 3.66% 2.36% 1.97% 3 4.17% 2.35% 1.96% The strain over the story height is insensitive to the number of elements. Also, the rotation over the story height is insensitive to the number of elements. Therefore these are good choices for D/C measures.

DISCONTINUOUS SHEAR WALLS

PIER AND SPANDREL FIBER MODELS Vertical and horizontal fiber models

RAYLEIGH DAMPING The aM dampers connect the masses to the ground. They exert external damping forces. Units of a are 1/T. The bK dampers act in parallel with the elements. They exert internal damping forces. Units of b are T. The damping matrix is C = aM + bK.

RAYLEIGH DAMPING For linear analysis, the coefficients a and b can be chosen to give essentially constant damping over a range of mode periods, as shown. A possible method is as follows : Choose TB = 0.9 times the first mode period. Choose TA = 0.2 times the first mode period. Calculate a and b to give 5% damping at these two values. The damping ratio is essentially constant in the first few modes. The damping ratio is higher for the higher modes.

& & & √ √ √ √ & & + & & ( b ) & a b a b u M + C u Ku = u M + a M + K u RAYLEIGH DAMPING t u M & + C u & + Ku = t u M & + & ( a M + b K ) u + Ku = u & C u & K + + u = M M u & + u & 2 2 x w + w u = w x 2 M = C ; a M b K x C C C = = = = + 2 M w √ M K √ 2 M 2 K M 2 √ M K 2 √ M K a b w x = + 2 w 2

Higher Modes (high w) = b RAYLEIGH DAMPING Higher Modes (high w) = b Lower Modes (low w) = a To get z from a & b for any w √ M K = 2p T = ; w To get a & b from two values of z1& z2 z1 = a 2w1 + b w1 2 Solve for a & b z2 = a 2w2 + b w2 2

DAMPING COEFFICIENT FROM HYSTERESIS

DAMPING COEFFICIENT FROM HYSTERESIS

A BIG THANK YOU!!!