Do Now Describe the following relationships. Do Now Describe the following relationships.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scatterplots and Correlation
Advertisements

3.1b Correlation Target Goal: I can determine the strength of a distribution using the correlation. D2 h.w: p 160 – 14 – 18, 21, 26.
EXAMINING RELATIONSHIPS Section 3.2 Correlation. Recall from yesterday…  A scatterplot displays form, direction, and strength of the relationship between.
Warm-up with 3.3 Notes on Correlation
Examining Relationships Prob. And Stat. 2.2 Correlation.
Warm-up with 3.3 Notes on Correlation Universities use SAT scores in the admissions process because they believe these scores provide some insight into.
Lesson Scatterplots and Correlation. Knowledge Objectives Explain the difference between an explanatory variable and a response variable Explain.
Objectives (IPS Chapter 2.1)
Section 4.1 Scatter Diagrams and Correlation. Definitions The Response Variable is the variable whose value can be explained by the value of the explanatory.
Chapter 4 - Scatterplots and Correlation Dealing with several variables within a group vs. the same variable for different groups. Response Variable:
Lesson Scatter Diagrams and Correlation. Objectives Draw and interpret scatter diagrams Understand the properties of the linear correlation coefficient.
C HAPTER 3: E XAMINING R ELATIONSHIPS. 3.2: C ORRELATION Measures the direction and strength of a linear relationship between two variables. Usually written.
Response Variable: measures the outcome of a study (aka Dependent Variable) Explanatory Variable: helps explain or influences the change in the response.
Correlation  We can often see the strength of the relationship between two quantitative variables in a scatterplot, but be careful. The two figures here.
Unit 3 – Association: Contingency, Correlation, and Regression Lesson 3-2 Quantitative Associations.
Topics
Review and Preview and Correlation
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Section 6.1: Scatterplots and Correlation (Day 2)
Describing Relationships
Chapter 4.2 Notes LSRL.
MATH 2311 Section 5.1 & 5.2.
3.1 Scatterplots and Correlation
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Aim – How can we analyze bivariate data using scatterplots?
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Correlation At a tournament, athletes throw a discus. The age and distance thrown are recorded for each athlete: Do you think the distance an athlete.
Regression and Residual Plots
Describing Bivariate Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
A P STATISTICS LESSON 3 – 2 CORRELATION.
Scatterplots and Correlation
A correlation is a relationship between two variables. 
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Unit 4 Vocabulary.
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Do Now Create a scatterplot following these directions
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Chapter 4 - Scatterplots and Correlation
3.1: Scatterplots & Correlation
A P STATISTICS LESSON 3 – 2 CORRELATION.
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
September 25, 2013 Chapter 3: Describing Relationships Section 3.1
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
Chapter 3: Describing Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Describing Bivariate Relationships
AP Stats Agenda Text book swap 2nd edition to 3rd Frappy – YAY
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Section 11.1 Correlation.
Chapter 3 Examining Relationships
Bivariate Data Response Variable: measures the outcome of a study (aka Dependent Variable) Explanatory Variable: helps explain or influences the change.
Correlation We can often see the strength of the relationship between two quantitative variables in a scatterplot, but be careful. The two figures here.
Review of Chapter 3 Examining Relationships
CHAPTER 3 Describing Relationships
Presentation transcript:

Do Now Describe the following relationships

Important ideas Explanatory- always on x axis (horizontal) Response – always on y axis (vertical) D.O.F.S Direction Outliers Form Strength

Correlation Coefficient The correlation r is a measure of the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two quantitative variables. • The correlation r is a value between -1 and 1 (-1 ≤ r ≤ 1). • If the relationship is negative, then r < 0. If the relationship is positive, then r > 0. • If r =1 or r = -1, then there is a perfect linear relationship. In other words, all of the points will be exactly on a line. • If there is very little scatter from the linear form, then r is close to 1 or -1. The more scatter from the linear form, the closer r is to 0.

Do Now Homework out!

Lesson 2.4: Calculating Correlation Objectives Calculate the correlation between two quantitative variables. Apply the properties of the correlation. Describe how outliers influence the correlation.

Calculating the Correlation 1. Find the mean 𝑥 and the standard deviation Sx of the explanatory variable. Calculate the z-score for the value of the explanatory variable for each individual. 2. Find the mean 𝑦 and the standard deviation Sy of the response variable. Calculate the z-score for the value of the response variable for each individual. 3. For each individual, multiply the z-score for the explanatory variable and the z-score for the response variable. 4. Add the z-score products and divide the sum by n-1. Here is the formula:

The table shows the foot length (in centimeters) and the height (in centimeters) for a random sample of six high school seniors. Calculate the correlation for these data.

Make a table to help you organize

Solution

Solution

Calculator Time! Hit 2nd 0 (Brings us to CATALOG) Scroll alllllll the way down to DiagnosticON (you only need to do this once, unless your calculator is reset or you use a different one) Hit enter And enter again. Should say “Done” Enter data into L1 and L2 (Stat-Edit) Then Stat-Calc –LinReg (a+bx) This is #8, not #4 r is your correlation coefficient!

To see the scatter plot Go to Stat Plot (2nd y=) and make sure plot1 is on It should also be set to scatter Then hit ZOOM Stat (#9)

If I give you homework…. You can use this website at home: https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/

You try! Find r, state the type of correlation. Confirm by looking at the scatterplot.

Properties of Correlation Correlation makes no distinction between explanatory and response variables. It makes no difference which variable you call x and which you call y in calculating the correlation. As you can see in the formula, reversing the roles of x and y would only change the order of the multiplication, not the product

Likewise, the scatterplots in the figure show the same direction and strength, even though the variables are reversed in the second scatterplot.

Because r uses the standardized values of the observations, r does not change when we change the units of measurement of x, y, or both. Measuring foot length and height in inches rather than centimeters does not change the correlation between foot length and height. The figure on the next page gives two scatterplots of the same six students. The graph on the left (a) uses centimeters for both measurements, and the graph on the right (b) uses inches for both measurements. The strength and direction are identical—only the scales on the axes have changed.

The correlation r has no units of measurement because we are using standardized values in the calculation and standardized values have no units.

You try! The scatterplot shows the relationship between 40-yarddash times and long-jump distances. The correlation is r = -0.838. What would happen to the correlation if long-jump distance was plotted on the horizontal axis and dash time was plotted on the vertical axis? Explain. What would happen to the correlation if long-jump distance was measured in feet instead of inches? Explain. Sabrina claims that the correlation between long-jump distance and dash time is r = -0.838 inches per second. Is this correct?

Solution The correlation would still be r = -0.838 because the correlation makes no distinction between explanatory and response variables. The correlation would still be r = -0.838 because the correlation doesn’t change when we change the units of either variable. No. The correlation doesn’t have units, so including “inches per second” is incorrect.

Check your understanding- Exit Ticket