Struggling and Success in Web Search

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beliefs & Biases in Web Search
Advertisements

Predicting User Interests from Contextual Information
Enhancing Personalized Search by Mining and Modeling Task Behavior
Learning to Suggest: A Machine Learning Framework for Ranking Query Suggestions Date: 2013/02/18 Author: Umut Ozertem, Olivier Chapelle, Pinar Donmez,
Struggling or Exploring? Disambiguating Long Search Sessions
SIGIR 2013 Recap September 25, 2013.
Beliefs & Biases in Web Search Ryen White Microsoft Research
DOMAIN DEPENDENT QUERY REFORMULATION FOR WEB SEARCH Date : 2013/06/17 Author : Van Dang, Giridhar Kumaran, Adam Troy Source : CIKM’12 Advisor : Dr. Jia-Ling.
Toward Whole-Session Relevance: Exploring Intrinsic Diversity in Web Search Date: 2014/5/20 Author: Karthik Raman, Paul N. Bennett, Kevyn Collins-Thompson.
Studies of the Onset & Persistence of Medical Concerns in Search Logs Ryen White and Eric Horvitz Microsoft Research, Redmond
1 Learning User Interaction Models for Predicting Web Search Result Preferences Eugene Agichtein Eric Brill Susan Dumais Robert Ragno Microsoft Research.
Search Engines and Information Retrieval
Ryen W. White, Microsoft Research Jeff Huang, University of Washington.
Ryen White, Susan Dumais, Jaime Teevan Microsoft Research {ryenw, sdumais,
Web Projections Learning from Contextual Subgraphs of the Web Jure Leskovec, CMU Susan Dumais, MSR Eric Horvitz, MSR.
Query Log Analysis Naama Kraus Slides are based on the papers: Andrei Broder, A taxonomy of web search Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Graphs from Search Engine Queries.
Advisor: Hsin-Hsi Chen Reporter: Chi-Hsin Yu Date:
Modern Retrieval Evaluations Hongning Wang
From Devices to People: Attribution of Search Activity in Multi-User Settings Ryen White, Ahmed Hassan, Adish Singla, Eric Horvitz Microsoft Research,
Web Usage Mining with Semantic Analysis Date: 2013/12/18 Author: Laura Hollink, Peter Mika, Roi Blanco Source: WWW’13 Advisor: Jia-Ling Koh Speaker: Pei-Hao.
Search Engines and Information Retrieval Chapter 1.
1 Context-Aware Search Personalization with Concept Preference CIKM’11 Advisor : Jia Ling, Koh Speaker : SHENG HONG, CHUNG.
MINING RELATED QUERIES FROM SEARCH ENGINE QUERY LOGS Xiaodong Shi and Christopher C. Yang Definitions: Query Record: A query record represents the submission.
Date: 2012/10/18 Author: Makoto P. Kato, Tetsuya Sakai, Katsumi Tanaka Source: World Wide Web conference (WWW "12) Advisor: Jia-ling, Koh Speaker: Jiun.
Evaluation Experiments and Experience from the Perspective of Interactive Information Retrieval Ross Wilkinson Mingfang Wu ICT Centre CSIRO, Australia.
Understanding and Predicting Graded Search Satisfaction Tang Yuk Yu 1.
Review of the web page classification approaches and applications Luu-Ngoc Do Quang-Nhat Vo.
Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information Eugene Agichtein Eric Brill Susan Dumais Microsoft Research.
CIKM’09 Date:2010/8/24 Advisor: Dr. Koh, Jia-Ling Speaker: Lin, Yi-Jhen 1.
Odyssey A Reuse Environment based on Domain Models Prepared By: Mahmud Gabareen Eliad Cohen.
Implicit Acquisition of Context for Personalization of Information Retrieval Systems Chang Liu, Nicholas J. Belkin School of Communication and Information.
Personalizing Search on Shared Devices Ryen White and Ahmed Hassan Awadallah Microsoft Research, USA Contact:
Binxing Jiao et. al (SIGIR ’10) Presenter : Lin, Yi-Jhen Advisor: Dr. Koh. Jia-ling Date: 2011/4/25 VISUAL SUMMARIZATION OF WEB PAGES.
1 Opinion Retrieval from Blogs Wei Zhang, Clement Yu, and Weiyi Meng (2007 CIKM)
Qi Guo Emory University Ryen White, Susan Dumais, Jue Wang, Blake Anderson Microsoft Presented by Tetsuya Sakai, Microsoft Research.
Adish Singla, Microsoft Bing Ryen W. White, Microsoft Research Jeff Huang, University of Washington.
Use of Search Engines Task 1. What you will need to produce Using three search engines complete three different types of search. –Basic Search –Advanced.
INTEGRATING BROWSING AND SEARCHING WebGlimpse and ScentTrails -Rajesh Golla.
Date: 2012/11/29 Author: Chen Wang, Keping Bi, Yunhua Hu, Hang Li, Guihong Cao Source: WSDM’12 Advisor: Jia-ling, Koh Speaker: Shun-Chen, Cheng.
26/01/20161Gianluca Demartini Ranking Categories for Faceted Search Gianluca Demartini L3S Research Seminars Hannover, 09 June 2006.
Identifying “Best Bet” Web Search Results by Mining Past User Behavior Author: Eugene Agichtein, Zijian Zheng (Microsoft Research) Source: KDD2006 Reporter:
Adaptive Faceted Browsing in Job Offers Danielle H. Lee
Date: 2013/9/25 Author: Mikhail Ageev, Dmitry Lagun, Eugene Agichtein Source: SIGIR’13 Advisor: Jia-ling Koh Speaker: Chen-Yu Huang Improving Search Result.
Predicting User Interests from Contextual Information R. W. White, P. Bailey, L. Chen Microsoft (SIGIR 2009) Presenter : Jae-won Lee.
Predicting Short-Term Interests Using Activity-Based Search Context CIKM’10 Advisor: Jia Ling, Koh Speaker: Yu Cheng, Hsieh.
1 Context-Aware Ranking in Web Search (SIGIR 10’) Biao Xiang, Daxin Jiang, Jian Pei, Xiaohui Sun, Enhong Chen, Hang Li 2010/10/26.
The TDR Targets Database Prioritizing potential drug targets in complete genomes.
Retroactive Answering of Search Queries Beverly Yang Glen Jeh Google, Inc. Presented.
Register SPID - Retailer
User Modeling for Personal Assistant
Chapter 11: Writing the Essay What Is an Essay?
Improving Search Relevance for Short Queries in Community Question Answering Date: 2014/09/25 Author : Haocheng Wu, Wei Wu, Ming Zhou, Enhong Chen, Lei.
Assessing the Scenic Route: Measuring the Value of Search Trails in Web Logs Ryen W. White1 Jeff Huang2 1Microsoft Research 1University of Washington.
Session 2 Welcome: The sixth learning sequence
Modern Retrieval Evaluations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Personalizing Search on Shared Devices
Machine Learning Week 1.
A Unifying View on Instance Selection
Learning Literature Search Models from Citation Behavior
The Mid Tudors A2 Evaluation and enquiry questions
Intent-Aware Semantic Query Annotation
Ryen White, Ahmed Hassan, Adish Singla, Eric Horvitz
Date : 2013/1/10 Author : Lanbo Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yunfei Chen
Example of Privilege Check Flow for Cockpit Items
Date: 2012/11/15 Author: Jin Young Kim, Kevyn Collins-Thompson,
Web Mining Research: A Survey
Journal of Web Semantics 55 (2019)
Measuring Learning During Search: Differences in Interactions, Eye-Gaze, and Semantic Similarity to Expert Knowledge Florian Groß Mai
Connecting the Dots Between News Article
Presentation transcript:

Struggling and Success in Web Search Date:2016/02/22 Author:Daan Odijk, Ryen W. White, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Susan T. Dumais Source:CIKM'15 Advisor:Jia-ling Koh Spearker:LIN,CI-JIE

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Introduction Web searchers sometimes struggle to find relevant information Struggling leads to frustrating and dissatisfying search experiences

Introduction Better understanding of search tasks where people struggle is important in improving search systems

Introduction Address this important issue using a mixed methods study using large-scale logs, crowd-sourced labeling, and predictive modeling

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Definitions Sessions A sequence of search interactions demarcated based on a 30-minute user inactivity timeout

Definitions Tasks As topically-coherent sub-sessions, i.e., sequences of search activity within sessions that share a common subject area Two queries belong to the same task if they are less than ten minutes (i) share at least one non-stop word term (ii)share at least one top ten search result or domain name

Definitions 30 min 30 min 30 min query1 query2 query3 query4 query5 session1 session2 session3 session4 task1 task2

DataSet Microsoft Bing Web search engine These sessions from the interaction log of Bing for the first seven days of June 2014

Mining Struggling Tasks Filter sessions sessions originating from en-US only considered sessions that started with a typed query Segment sessions into tasks refine sessions into topically coherent sub-sessions that cover a single task Filter struggling tasks at least three queries where the first two lead to either no clicks or only quick-back clicks

Mining Struggling Tasks Partition based on final click Unsuccessful If a searcher does not click on any result for the final query or when their only clicks are quick-back clicks Successful If a searcher clicks on a search results and no interaction for at least 30 seconds

Task Characteristics such as searcher tenacity and sunk cost, that may explain more of a reluctance to abandon unsuccessful tasks

Interaction Characteristics we observe that queries without clicks are more common in unsuccessful tasks

Considering the successful tasks, we see the time between queries increases as the task progresses, mostly due to an increase in dwell time

Query Reformulation 1.specialization is most likely to occur directly after the first query 2. New queries are most likely as second query and, surprisingly, as the last query

Query transitions Each task was judged by three human annotators 442 successful tasks judge how successful they think the searcher was in the task on a four-point scale: not at all, somewhat, mostly, completely

Query transitions It is worth noting that switching to a new task Specifying an instance also occurs relatively often in the less successful tasks Addition, substitution, and deletion actions or attributions typically occurs in more successful tasks

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Predict reformulation strategy Predict inter-query transitions during struggling searches Frame this as a multi-class classification problem; one for each of the 11 query reformulation types RandomForest classifier

Features

Features

Features

Features After the first query transition we add history features that represent the reformulation type and previous transition strategy

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Experimental Setup use the 659 labeled tasks with a total of 1802 query transitions

Different stages between two queries First query observed the first query and try to predict the next reformulation strategy First+Interaction observed the first query and interactions (clicks, dwell time) Second query observed both the first and second query

First query classifier output Query Features Interaction features Query Transition Features Query Similarity Features Query Reformulation Features classifier output

First+Interaction classifier output Query Features Interaction features Query Transition Features Query Similarity Features Query Reformulation Features classifier output

Second query classifier output Query Features Interaction features Query Transition Features Query Similarity Features Query Reformulation Features classifier output

Outline Introduction Observation Method Experiment Conclusion

Conclusion Developed classifiers to accurately predict key aspects of inter-query transitions for struggling searches, with a view to helping searchers struggle less