The Current State of Interstate Maintenance Contracting September 23, 2010 Jake Porter Assistant State Maintenance Engineer (acting)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Advertisements

State of Good Repair, Transit Rehab and Maintenance of Buses BusCon Jeff Hiott Sr. Program Manager September 11, 2012.
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Railcar 101 The Basics of Railcars: Car Types, Components and Rules
Incident Response in Washington State
1 System Engineers Toolbox 1 Compliance Automation, Inc. INCOSE: NM Enchantment Chapter By Cheryl Hill August 12, 2009.
Business Process Improvement in the Economic Programs Directorate at the U.S. Census Bureau Deborah M. Stempowski Shirin A. Ahmed U.S. Census Bureau ICES.
Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study Study Update – Transportation.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Board Transportation Committee Updates on Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Discussion of Converting.
County of Fairfax, Virginia 1 Department of Transportation Bus Stop Improvement Program Fairfax County Department of Transportation Transit Services Division.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
RECORD KEEPING Cooperative Development of Operational
00 Project Gates Briefing to the Capital Program Oversight Committee February 2011 Capital Program Management.
How to improve the technical and financial management of the TEN-T projects? Ioannis Giogkarakis-Argyropoulos, Head of Unit T2 – Road and Rail Transport,
Welcome to VetSuccess Orientation
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
September 28, 2013 Greg Duncan, Assistant Chief Engineer of Operations Anaheim, CA Performance Based Maintenance Contracting in Tennessee (Experience One.
Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs
1 Item 11, Presentation to the TPB, September 15, 2010.
Government Services Group Wednesday, 18 September 2013 Purchase Cards Government Services Group Presented by Miro Dabek, Manager Procure to Pay Reform.
Why a Bus Fee Increase is Needed Texas States current bus contract expires the end of fiscal year 2014 (August 2014). – 10 year bus contract plus one extension.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
August 2012 EEO Workshop Series 2012 BlueScope Steel – Second Cycle Strategy and Case Studies Paul Wright Environment Manager Resource Efficiency & Climate.
Output & Performance based Road Contracts (OPRC)
Turnkey Asset Maintenance Services (TAMS) Contracts Overview
HUMPPA Program Managed Performance Based Maintenance Contract Espoo Pilot Project 2014 – 2019 Katja Levola, Pirkanmaan ELY-Centre International Partnership.
Property Management Contract Oversight VDOTs Outsourced Safety Rest Area Program November 15, 2013 Maintenance Division.
Chapter Outline Hedging and Price Volatility Managing Financial Risk
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Strategic Meetings Management 101
Design-Build Procurement Overview
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
FY 2009 COST SAVING MEASURES Gov. Body Meeting Oct. 14, 2008.
1 BLUEPRINT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING UPDATE AND STATUS REPORT Virginia Association of Counties August, 2009 DAVID S. EKERN, P.E. COMMISSIONER.
Title VI and Fares March 18, 2013 Jonathan Ocana Equal Opportunity Specialist.
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
TechStat Presented By, Agency Seal. TechStat Thesis 2 Point 2 Point 1 Point 3.
1 Date: Northamptonshire County Council and Kier Getting it ‘right first time’ County Councils Network Annual Conference Annual Conference 19 th November,
1 A risk-based approach to auditing procurement in English councils Mark Wardman Senior Manager Audit Commission 19 May 2014.
HB 1048 / SB 518 Adjustments for Local Programs May 13, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
1 Revenue Update Jody M. Wagner Secretary of Finance Commonwealth of Virginia
6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
October 7, 2013 Gregory Whirley Commissioner 2013 Fall Asphalt Conference.
House Bill 2 and P3 Update Aubrey Layne Secretary of Transportation December 17, 2014.
Local Programs Update July 24, 2014 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.
Emerging Transportation Technologies in Virginia Ken Earnest Assistant Division Administrator Operations Division.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
> taking best practice to the world International Experience with Performance Based Maintenance Contracts.
Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
1 Board Meeting September 29, 2014 Public-Private Transportation Partnership Board.
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
The main rationale behind developing the warranty clause template is to make the prospective contractors implement a maintenance philosophy which would.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
1 Approaches for Integrating Systems Engineering into Your Agency’s Business Practices Presented by: Amy Tang McElwain August 2, 2007 Talking Technology.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
1 -A BLUEPRINT- VDOT Response to a Declining Economy David S. Ekern, P.E. Commissioner Virginia Department of Transportation October 15, 2008.
Current Interstate Maintenance Services Contracts
Presentation transcript:

The Current State of Interstate Maintenance Contracting September 23, 2010 Jake Porter Assistant State Maintenance Engineer (acting)

2 Code of Virginia § Requires that, with a few exceptions, all maintenance on components of the Interstate Highway System in Virginia shall be carried out under contracts awarded by the Commissioner and approved by the Commonwealth Transportation Board by July 1, 2009.Background

3 Traditional Contracts: Rehabilitation and reconstruction contracts for items such as pavements, bridges and major assets are done by traditional contracts. Turnkey Asset Maintenance Services (TAMS) Contracts: Performance-based services contracts were initially developed: To transition from the expiration of the Pilot Maintenance PPTA (July 1, 2007). To provide maintenance services for the repair or replacement of roadway assets, vegetation control, emergency and incident response, and snow and ice control services. To deliver the same or higher level of service in response to decreasing VDOT personnel resources. Outsourcing Methods

4 Today there are13 TAMS contracts: Contract terms are primarily five (5) years; one (1) contract has a contract term of three (3) years Three (3) contracts in NOVA do not include snow and ice control services; these services are provided by three (3) additional but separate contracts Nine (9) contracts were recently modified to reduced standards (non-safety related) to achieve cost reductions in response to economy Two (2) contracts were recently defaulted for snow and ice control non-performance. Current Status

8/15/2010 8/14/ /2 5 Culpeper 6/14/2015 6/15/2010 DBI11 18ICA

6 TAMS ContractsContractor Lane Miles Estimated Annual Value End Date Williamsburg I-64*ICA357$3,628, Richmond North I- 64/95/others VMS1102$9,621, Richmond South I- 85/95/295 VMS621$5,087, Bristol I-81/77/381TME670$7,926, Staunton North I- 81/66 DBI428$3,558, Hampton Roads I- 64/264/others TME690$5,850, TAMS Contract Details

7 TAMS ContractsContractor Lane Miles Estimated Annual Value End Date NOVA I-95/395ICA651$3,329, NOVA I-66ICA392$2,729, NOVA I-495ICA211$1,427, NOVA WWBDBI103$7,267, Culpeper I-64**TME374$5,563, Staunton South I-81/64 pending502na Salem I-81pending460na TOTALS:6565$55,990,036 TAMS Contract Details

8 ORIGINAL TAMS CONTRACT Performance deductions based on individual asset item score/rating Seventy three percent (73%) of sites evaluated per year Only one evaluation cycle per year Annual evaluation cost estimated at $2,138,088 Deductions eligible to be returned to contractor No non-performance deduction cap Evaluation results dispute procedures did not exist Exit evaluation did not exist MODIFIED TAMS CONTRACT Performance deductions based on asset group score/rating reflective of work not performed Five percent (5%) of sites evaluated per cycle Up to three (3) evaluation cycles per year Annual evaluation cost estimated at $674,415 Deductions are permanent Deduction cap of twenty (20) percent of annual contract value Evaluation results dispute procedures implemented Exit evaluation protocols implemented Maintenance Rating Program (MRP)

9 ORIGINAL TAMS CONTRACT Must meet the timeliness requirements in the performance criteria No monetary deductions associated with timeliness non-performance MODIFIED TAMS CONTRACT Must meet the timeliness requirements in the performance criteria Timeliness performance is evaluated on a daily basis, monetary deductions assessed monthly for work not performed Repeat timeliness non-performance results in increased deductions Timeliness deductions for non-performance capped at three (3) percent of the monthly contract value (excludes snow and ice) Process for timeliness non-performance deduction disputes implemented Timeliness Requirements

10 Strives to ensure safety to the traveling public Eliminates potential long term delays in needed asset repairs or replacements Goal of extending life of the asset(s) or stopping/slowing deterioration Risk shared between VDOT and Contractor Facilitates improved contractor productivity, efficiency, and responsiveness (where and when necessary) Provides VDOT with an effective management tool Benefits of Timeliness Requirements

11 Performance-based contracting requires different tools and skill sets from traditional contract management: – measurement systems for performance over the life of the contract – timeliness requirements due to some public safety aspects of the work. Performance based contracts are still relatively new in the US and we continue to learn from our own contracting experiences as well as those in other states. Due to budget reductions last fiscal year, modifications had to be made to reduce service levels. Contract modifications have resulted in cost savings, improved contract enforceability and statewide consistency. Recently awarded I-64 Culpeper contract include lessons learned from modifications, NOVAs WWB TAMS contract, and recently defaulted contracts. Lessons Learned

12 Limited market competition – very few vendors have entered into this new market. VDOT continues to search for the best methods for contracting for critical maintenance and emergency services. VDOT initiated meetings with the industry have helped us partner to improve the contracts and service deliver. Transfer of risk into 24 hour interstate emergency services contracts is costly. More importantly, such risk can and does impact public safety. Legislated outsourcing mandate has impact on the leverage of VDOT in contract negotiations. Lessons Learned

13 Fall 2010: Completing incorporating stakeholder ideas into a new template contract Staunton South TAMS Contract, based on the new template, for portions of I-81 and I-64 in the Staunton District, will be advertised this Fall Continuing our partnership with companies interested in this work through VDOT – TAMS Industry Meetings Commitment to continue to make improvements based on lessons learned Future Actions

14 Questions? Thank you. Jake Porter Interstate Maintenance Contracting