International Comparison

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 1 Comparing Health Care Systems Performance: Opportunities for Learning from Abroad Alliance for Health Reform April 11, 2008 Robin.

Advertisements

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND A iming Higher A State Scorecard on Health System Performance Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President The Commonwealth Fund Alliance for.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011 Cathy Schoen, Senior Vice President.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance: Complete Chartpack Cathy Schoen, Senior Vice President Sabrina K. H. How, Research.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Rising Health Care Costs: Implications for the Health and Financial Security of U.S. Families Sara R. Collins, Ph.D. Assistant Vice.

National Scorecard, 2008: Chartpack This Chartpack presents data for all indicators scored in the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance,

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Why Not the Best? Results from a National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance September 20, 2006 Cathy Schoen Senior Vice.

Figure ES-1. How Well Do Different Strategies Meet Principles for Health Insurance Reform? Principles for Reform Tax Incentives and Individual Insurance.

Why Not the Best? A High Performance Health System in Hawaii Hawaii Uninsured Project Fall Forum October 23, 2006 Anne Gauthier Senior Policy Director.

“If We Are So Good... Why Aren’t We Better?” A Critical and Quick View of the U.S. Health Care System Forces of Change - Fall 2010 Eric D. Kupferberg,

4/19/2017 Although wealthy nations have better child survival, there is enormous variation in child survival at any given level of national wealth. Child.

Working Session 4: Quality and Efficiency Expanding the Use of Healthcare IT: The United States Initiative and the Development of Healthcare IT in Japan.

Quality and Cost International Perspectives Derek Feeley Director of Healthcare Policy and Strategy NHS Scotland.

John E McDonough, DPH, MPA Harvard School of Public Health October, 2013 Housing, Health and U.S. Health Reform: New Opportunities for Convergence Programs.

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the US Health Care System Compares Internationally Phusit Prakongsai International Health Policy Program.

Health System Performance: Challenges for the U.S. and Canada

Integrating Public Health and Safety Net Care Healthcare Safety Net Initiatives: Policy and Performance Eduardo Sanchez, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Institute.

The 2002 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey Adults with Health Problems The Commonwealth Fund Harvard University School of Public Health.

The High Performance Health System Dov Chernichovsky, Ph.D. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

California Education Coalition for Health Care Reform INTRODUCTION TO CECHCR.

A Perspective from England Professor Chris Ham Chief Executive The King’s Fund 15 May 2014.

International Comparison of Health Care Gene Chang.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Cost-Related Access Problems Among the Chronically Ill, in Eight Countries, 2008 Base: Adults with any chronic condition Percent.

THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Source: McCarthy and Leatherman, Performance Snapshots, Percentage of Sicker Adults Reporting Gaps in.

Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker Health of the Healthcare System: An overview.

Health Policy in New York: The Landscape in 2009 James R. Tallon, Jr. President United Hospital Fund December 9, 2008.

Date of download: 7/9/2016 From: Achieving a High-Performance Health Care System with Universal Access: What the United States Can Learn from Other Countries.

National Health Expenditure Trends, 1975 to 2016

David Radley and Cathy Schoen

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the U. S

Health Care Spending as a Percentage of GDP, 1980–2014

Lower-Income Adults with Marketplace Plans More Likely to View Their Premiums as Affordable Than Adults with Higher Incomes How easy or difficult is it.

How do health expenditures vary across the population?

The U.S. Health Care System: An International Perspective

National Trends in Per Capita Pharmaceutical Spending, 1980–2015

Senior Vice President, The Commonwealth Fund

Mirror Mirror Teleconference

Economic Indicators Answers

High Performance Accountable Care: What Do We Need to Do?

Overall Ranking Country Rankings 1.00– – –7.00 AUS CAN

Survey of adults age 18 and older in eleven countries.

Insurance Complexity and Restrictions Create Concerns for Patients and Doctors Adults, 2013 Insurance did not cover as expected/spent a lot of time on.

What is behind the recent slowdown in health spending?

Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2018

Section 13.4 Measures of Central Tendency

A Three Year View of Overall Ranking

Adults Ages 19–64 Who Are Uninsured and Underinsured, By Poverty Status, 2007 *Underinsured defined as insured all year but experienced one of the following:

How do health expenditures vary across the population?

QUALITY: COORDINATED CARE

Strengthen Medicare Rx drug coverage Reform Medicare payment

16 Million Adults Under Age 65 Were Underinsured in 2005

Percent of adults ages 19–64 with at least one chronic condition*

25 Million Adults Underinsured in 2007, Up from 16 Million in 2003

Payment System Options

Adults with Health Problems Who Have an Excellent Patient Experience Report Greater Support to Help Manage Their Health Condition Percent of adults 18–64.

Seven of 10 Adults with Marketplace Plans Rate Their Coverage as Excellent, Very Good, or Good Now thinking about (your current health insurance coverage/

Medical Bill Problems or Medical Debt

Two of Five Adults Uninsured or Underinsured 25 Million Underinsured 60 Percent Increase in Underinsured from 2003 to 2007 Percent of adults (ages 19–64)

Figure 26. Primary Care: Summary and Implications

Adults Ages 19–64 Who Are Uninsured and Underinsured, by Poverty Status, 2003 *Underinsured defined as insured all year but experienced one of the following:

The Number of Underinsured Adults Under Age 65 Rose to 25 Million in 2007, Up from 16 Million in 2003 Percent of adults ages 19– Total.

QUALITY: EFFECTIVE CARE

Percent of adults (ages 19–64)

Exhibit ES-1. Overall Ranking

Number of employees in firm

Adults ages 19–64 who are uninsured or have individual coverage

Insured now, time uninsured during year

EQUITY: EFFECTIVE CARE

Percent of adults (ages 19–64)

Mirror Mirror: US and Canada Fall Behind

Presentation transcript:

International Comparison Country Rankings Best 1-2.66 2.67-4.33 Worst 4.33-6.0 AUSTRALIA CANADA GERMANY NEW ZEALAND UNITED KINGDOM STATES OVERALL RANKING (2007) 3.5 5 2 1 6 Quality Care 4 2.5 Right Care 3 Safe Care Coordinated Care Patient-Centered Care Access Efficiency Equity Long, Healthy, and Productive Lives 4.5 Health Expenditures per Capita, 2004 $2,876* $3,165 $3,005* $2,083 $2,546 $6,102 Scorecard findings corroborate Mirror, Mirror article, which used data from surveys of patients, as well as information from primary care physicians about their medical practices and views of their countries' health systems. United States generally 5th or 6th of 6 on similar metrics despite spending more than twice per capita. The U.S. is the only country in the study without universal health insurance coverage, partly accounting for its poor performance on access, equity, and health outcomes. Telephone Surveys compiled. After the survey data were collected, items from each survey were grouped into one of the following five dimensions of performance used in the National Scorecard: quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives. Because of the limitations of the patient surveys, some dimensions of quality were measured with a greater number of items, and some dimensions of quality were measured more robustly. After grouping survey items under one of these five domains of quality, we ranked each country’s score on individual items from highest to lowest (where 1 equals the highest score). Next, we calculated a summary ranking for each domain of quality by averaging the individual ranked scores within each country and ranking these averages from highest to lowest score. For ties in means, the tied observations were assigned the average of the ranks that would be assigned if there were no ties. We ranked each equity indicator based on the percentage-point difference between above-average income respondents and below-average income respondents, with lower scores ranking higher. Source: K. Davis, C. Schoen, S. C. Schoenbaum, M. M. Doty, A. L. Holmgren, J. L. Kriss, and K. K. Shea, Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: An International Update on the Comparative Performance of American Health Care, The Commonwealth Fund, May 2007 * 2003 data